Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

indication-dossier

Build a structured research dossier for a defined patient population, covering epidemiology, disease biology, current treatment, regulatory precedents, and major clinical trials. Receive a cited report and structured data to inform therapeutic development and trial planning.

OriginalShow the original description

Generate a therapeutic indication dossier. Covers the patient population, epidemiology, disease biology, standard of care, regulatory precedent, and landmark clinical trials.

See how to install

Good for

  • Characterizing a target patient population
  • Reviewing current treatments and unmet needs
  • Researching regulatory precedents and landmark trials
  • Resuming a research dossier from saved progress

Files included (10)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • .catalog_stamp13 B
  • references/00-research-standards.md3.0 KB
  • references/01-meta-initialization.md1.7 KB
  • references/02-epidemiology-research.md2.1 KB
  • references/03-biology-soc-research.md2.3 KB
  • references/04-regulatory-trials-research.md3.1 KB
  • references/05-synthesis.md5.2 KB
  • references/06-writing-style.md1.7 KB
  • references/waypoint-schemas.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Indication Dossier

Produces a structured research dossier on a single indication, framed as a patient population: who they are, what's wrong, how they're treated today, and how clinical trials can be designed to help them. Runs as five phases that write resumable waypoint files; after a brief identity check at the end of Phase 1, the remaining phases run straight through.

Framing

Think of an indication as a patient population. Frame everything from the patient perspective: "Who are these patients?" not "What is this disease?"; "How are these patients identified and managed?" not "What causes this condition?"; population nesting: "all patients in {child} are patients in {parent}".

Some indications don't map to ICD codes or standard disease definitions: "immunosenescence" is a biological state, not a billable diagnosis; "ageing" is not an FDA-accepted indication; "GLP-1 induced sarcopenia" is an iatrogenic population. Note these distinctions explicitly. They matter for regulatory path and trial design.

Inputs

  • indication (required) — indication name (e.g., "sarcopenia", "idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis").
  • additional_context (optional) — areas to focus on, parent indication, or other framing.
  • workdir (optional) — where to write waypoints and the final report. Defaults to ./do_not_commit/indication-dossier-<slug>/.

Tools this skill expects

PurposeTool
ClinicalTrials.govclinical-trials MCP
Literaturepubmed MCP
WebWebSearch, WebFetch — FDA guidance, treatment guidelines (NCCN, AASLD, specialty societies), CDC/WHO epidemiology data
DocumentsWebFetch for remote PDFs; Read for local PDFs
SubagentsAgent for parallel evidence gathering

If a listed MCP isn't connected, say so and fall back to WebSearch against the underlying public source (clinicaltrials.gov, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Output layout

<workdir>/
└── waypoints/
    ├── progress.json                 # loop control
    ├── meta.json                     # phase 1
    ├── epidemiology.json             # phase 2
    ├── biology_soc.json              # phase 3
    ├── regulatory_trials.json        # phase 4
    ├── sources_evaluated.json
    ├── research_output.json          # phase 5 — structured output
    └── indication_dossier_report.md  # phase 5 — the deliverable

Schemas for every waypoint file are in references/waypoint-schemas.md. Waypoints are the resumable state. If the workdir already has waypoints, read them, summarize what's done, and ask which phase to resume from.

Before starting

Read references/00-research-standards.md. It governs sourcing and the anti-fabrication rules for every phase. Then create <workdir>/waypoints/.

Workflow

The dossier is built in five phases. After each phase, write the waypoint file and emit a ≤200-word summary of what you found and what's uncertain, then proceed directly to the next phase. The one exception is Phase 1: after writing meta.json, show the resolved indication identity and call ask_user with options Proceed / Revise identity / Stop, so a misread indication name can be caught before the expensive phases run. If ask_user is unavailable, state "proceeding on this interpretation; interrupt now to correct it" and continue.

Phase 1 — Meta initialization

Read references/01-meta-initialization.md. Resolve the indication identity: clinical definition, ICD codes, aliases, parent indication, and whether it's a recognized diagnostic entity. Run a quick CT.gov landscape scan. Stand up waypoints/meta.json.

Phase 2 — Epidemiology research

Read references/02-epidemiology-research.md. Characterize the population: diagnostic criteria, prevalence and incidence, demographics and risk factors, natural history. Use parallel subagents to search PubMed and the web simultaneously. Write waypoints/epidemiology.json.

Phase 3 — Biology & standard-of-care research

Read references/03-biology-soc-research.md. Establish pathophysiology, biomarkers, approved therapies, treatment guidelines, and unmet need. Use parallel subagents: PubMed for biology, web for guidelines, FDA for approvals. Write waypoints/biology_soc.json.

Phase 4 — Regulatory & trials research

Read references/04-regulatory-trials-research.md. Establish FDA/EMA accepted endpoints, regulatory precedents, typical trial design parameters, landmark trials, and notable failures. Use parallel subagents: FDA for guidance/approvals, CT.gov for trial patterns, PubMed for trial-history reviews. Write waypoints/regulatory_trials.json.

Phase 5 — Synthesis

Read references/05-synthesis.md and references/06-writing-style.md. Read all four consolidated waypoint files. Write waypoints/indication_dossier_report.md — narrative sections in the order the synthesis reference specifies, with inline citations per the style guide — and waypoints/research_output.json. No new research threads in this phase. Targeted gap-fills are allowed: a single fetch to resolve a specific missing value in an existing waypoint field (an approval year, an NCT ID, a figure from a sponsor pipeline page). Anything broader than that, name as a gap rather than filling it.

Resuming

If invoked with a workdir that already contains waypoints: list which phases are complete (waypoint file exists and is non-empty), show the meta summary, and ask the user which phase to run next. Never overwrite an existing waypoint without confirmation.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

alphafold2

FreeSummary

Predict structures for single proteins or protein complexes with AlphaFold2 through ColabFold. Use confidence scores and comparisons with a designed structure to assess whether a designed sequence folds as intended.

  • Predicting a single protein's structure from its sequence
  • Predicting structures of protein complexes
  • Checking designed sequences against a target structure
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

boltz

FreeSummary

Use Boltz-2 to predict structures of complexes containing proteins, DNA, RNA, and small molecules. Obtain structure files and confidence scores to assess designed binders, with optional predictions of binding strength between a protein and a small molecule.

  • Assessing a designed binder against its target
  • Predicting a protein and small-molecule complex
  • Predicting complexes containing DNA or RNA
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

borzoi

FreeSummary

Predict patterns of gene expression and other genomic measurements from DNA sequences with Borzoi. Compare reference and altered sequences to estimate regulatory effects, generate predicted coverage tracks, and prioritize variants in regions that do not encode proteins.

  • Comparing predicted effects before and after a DNA variant
  • Generating predicted coverage tracks for a genomic region
  • Prioritizing variants in non-coding regions
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

chai1

FreeSummary

Predict three-dimensional structures of complexes containing proteins, RNA, DNA, and small molecules with Chai-1. Compare candidate structures using confidence scores and clash indicators, or run repeated predictions from Python to evaluate designed binders.

  • Predicting antibody–antigen complex structures
  • Evaluating protein–ligand binding structures
  • Reassessing designed binders
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Prepare reproducible setup and removal instructions for software environments on Open-Science SSH hosts, including Slurm clusters. Check available tools, define named activation settings, and validate the environment where jobs run after the user installs it.

  • Preparing a remote environment for required packages
  • Making job environment activation repeatable
  • Checking software and GPU operation on Slurm nodes
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

customize

FreeSummary

Create and manage focused Specialist agents and Skills through conversation. Draft agent roles, review available Skills and Connectors, configure access, and manage changes, with Skill creation and publishing handled by the application's internal skill-creator.

  • Creating a Specialist for a focused role
  • Updating an agent's Skills and Connectors
  • Creating, revising, and publishing Skills
aipoch/open-science5.3KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by aipoch

Report a problem with this skill