Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

omakase-off

This skill should be used as the entry gate for build/create/implement requests. Triggers on "build X", "create Y", "implement Z", "add feature", "try both approaches", "not sure which approach". Offers brainstorm-together or omakase (chef's choice parallel exploration) options. Detects indecision during brainstorming to offer parallel exploration.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/detailed-workflow.md7.9 KB
  • skill-report.json26.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Omakase-Off

Chef's choice exploration - when you're not sure WHAT to build, explore different approaches in parallel.

Part of Test Kitchen Development:

  • omakase-off - Chef's choice exploration (different approaches/plans)
  • cookoff - Same recipe, multiple cooks compete (same plan, multiple implementations)

Core principle: Let indecision emerge naturally during brainstorming, then implement multiple approaches in parallel to let real code + tests determine the best solution.

Three Triggers

Trigger 1: BEFORE Brainstorming

When: "I want to build...", "Create a...", "Implement...", "Add a feature..."

Present:

Before we brainstorm the details, would you like to:

1. Brainstorm together - We'll explore requirements and design step by step
2. Omakase (chef's choice) - I'll generate 3-5 best approaches, implement them
   in parallel, and let tests pick the winner

Trigger 2: DURING Brainstorming (Indecision Detection)

Detection signals:

  • 2+ uncertain responses in a row on architectural decisions
  • Phrases: "not sure", "don't know", "either works", "you pick", "no preference"

When detected:

You seem flexible on the approach. Would you like to:
1. I'll pick what seems best and continue brainstorming
2. Explore multiple approaches in parallel (omakase-off)

Trigger 3: Explicitly Requested

  • "try both approaches", "explore both", "omakase"
  • "implement both variants", "let's see which is better"

Workflow Overview

PhaseDescription
0. EntryPresent brainstorm vs omakase choice
1. BrainstormPassive slot detection during design
1.5. DecisionIf slots detected, offer parallel exploration
2. PlanGenerate implementation plan per variant
3. ImplementDispatch ALL agents in SINGLE message
4. EvaluateScenario tests → fresh-eyes → judge survivors
5. CompleteFinish winner, cleanup losers

See references/detailed-workflow.md for full phase details.

Directory Structure

docs/plans/<feature>/
  design.md                  # Shared context from brainstorming
  omakase/
    variant-<slug>/
      plan.md                # Implementation plan for this variant
    result.md                # Final report

.worktrees/
  variant-<slug>/            # Omakase variant worktree

Slot Classification

TypeExamplesWorth exploring?
ArchitecturalStorage engine, framework, auth methodYes
TrivialFile location, naming, config formatNo

Only architectural decisions become slots for parallel exploration.

Variant Limits

Max 5-6 implementations. Don't do full combinatorial explosion:

  1. Identify the primary axis (biggest architectural impact)
  2. Create variants along that axis
  3. Fill secondary slots with natural pairings

Critical Rules

  1. Dispatch ALL variants in SINGLE message - Multiple Task tools, one message
  2. MUST use scenario-testing - Not manual verification
  3. Fresh-eyes on survivors - Required before judge comparison
  4. Always cleanup losers - Remove worktrees and branches
  5. Write result.md - Document what was tried and why winner won

Skills Orchestrated

DependencyUsage
brainstormingModified flow with passive slot detection
writing-plansGenerate implementation plan per variant
git-worktreesCreate isolated worktree per variant
parallel-agentsDispatch all variant subagents in parallel
scenario-testingRun same scenarios against all variants
fresh-eyesQuality review on survivors → input for judge
finish-branchHandle winner (merge/PR), cleanup losers

Example Flow

User: "I need to build a CLI todo app."

Claude: [Triggers omakase-off]
Before we dive in, how would you like to approach this?
1. Brainstorm together
2. Omakase (chef's choice)

User: "1"

Claude: [Brainstorming proceeds, detects indecision on storage]

You seem flexible on storage (JSON vs SQLite). Would you like to:
1. Explore in parallel - I'll implement both variants
2. Best guess - I'll pick JSON (simpler)

User: "1"

[Creates plans for variant-json, variant-sqlite]
[Dispatches parallel agents in SINGLE message]
[Runs scenario tests on both]
[Fresh-eyes review on survivors]
[Presents comparison, user picks winner]
[Cleans up loser, finishes winner branch]

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing prior policy analysis; or producing an Acquisition Policy Impact Brief. Use published federal sources and supplied policy documents without making legal or procurement-specific applicability determinations. Do not use for clause selection, market research execution, opportunities, pricing, grants, or cooperative agreements.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

Systematic framework for extracting actionable items from documents and organizing them into prioritized, trackable checklists. Use when converting reports, meeting notes, audits, or any document with embedded action items into structured TODO lists.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

Browser automation for AI agents via inference.sh. Navigate web pages, interact with elements using @e refs, take screenshots, record video. Capabilities: web scraping, form filling, clicking, typing, drag-drop, file upload, JavaScript execution. Use for: web automation, data extraction, testing, agent browsing, research. Triggers: browser, web automation, scrape, navigate, click, fill form, screenshot, browse web, playwright, headless browser, web agent, surf internet, record video

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

Run AI apps via inference.sh CLI - image generation, video creation, LLMs, search, 3D, Twitter automation. Models: FLUX, Veo, Gemini, Grok, Claude, Seedance, OmniHuman, Tavily, Exa, OpenRouter, and many more. Use when running AI apps, generating images/videos, calling LLMs, web search, or automating Twitter. Triggers: inference.sh, infsh, ai model, run ai, serverless ai, ai api, flux, veo, claude api, image generation, video generation, openrouter, tavily, exa search, twitter api, grok

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

aiskillstore/marketplace443Updated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by aiskillstore

Report a problem with this skill