Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

boost-asio-pro

Write and review asynchronous C++ networking code using Boost.Asio or standalone Asio. The skill selects an implementation style for the installed library and C++ version, then checks memory lifetimes, concurrent writes, error handling, and build settings.

OriginalShow the original description

Use when writing or reviewing asynchronous C++ networking code with Boost.Asio or standalone Asio — TCP/UDP servers and clients, SSL/TLS, timers, strands, io_context, co_spawn, awaitable, async_read/async_write, asio::spawn, yield_context, or pre-C++20 completion-handler callbacks.

See how to install

Good for

  • Implementing asynchronous TCP or UDP servers and clients
  • Reviewing buffer lifetimes and concurrent socket writes
  • Adapting networking code to older Boost and C++ versions
  • Checking SSL/TLS synchronization and build settings

Files included (6)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • references/build.md3.0 KB
  • references/classic-boost.md1.7 KB
  • references/coroutines.md16.1 KB
  • references/pre-cpp20.md8.2 KB
  • references/ssl.md1.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Boost.Asio / standalone Asio

Overview

Write async C++ networking code that compiles on the user's Boost, not the newest one. Asio's API changed shape three times (classic io_service → io_context → C++20 coroutines) and most Asio code on the internet is from the first era, so pick the style from the toolchain first, then follow that style's reference file.

References: Boost.Asio · standalone Asio

Use this skill whenever async C++ networking code is being written or reviewed — and especially when the target toolchain is old, where coroutine examples simply will not compile. The three worked implementations it references are CI-verified from Boost 1.62 (2016) through 1.90.

Step 1: pick the style (do this before writing code)

Determine the Boost (or Asio) version and the C++ standard actually in use — find_package(Boost) output, dpkg -l libboost-dev, brew info boost, CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD, or ask. Do not assume the newest.

BoostC++ stdStyleRead
≥ 1.77C++20Coroutines (co_await + awaitable<T>) — preferredreferences/coroutines.md
≥ 1.74C++11–17Completion handlers (callbacks) — the portable baselinereferences/pre-cpp20.md
≥ 1.80C++11–17Stackful asio::spawn + yield_context (links Boost.Coroutine — not header-only)references/pre-cpp20.md
1.62–1.65C++11Classic io_service / strand.wrap / expires_from_nowreferences/classic-boost.md

SSL/TLS in any style: references/ssl.md. CMake for any style: references/build.md.

io_context, make_strand, bind_executor, steady_timer, signal_set, async_read/async_write/async_read_until, buffers and resolver are library features — identical in the coroutine and callback styles. Only the suspension mechanism differs.

Step 2: version floors (verified by compiling, not from docs)

Reach for one of these and the build breaks on older distros:

FeatureFloor
experimental/awaitable_operators.hpp (the || / && operators)Boost ≥ 1.77 / Asio ≥ 1.20
as_tuple completion tokenBoost ≥ 1.79 / Asio ≥ 1.21
co_composed (custom composed ops)Boost ≥ 1.85 / Asio ≥ 1.30
3-arg asio::spawn(ex, fn, token)Boost ≥ 1.80 (older Boost has only spawn(ex, fn))
any_io_executor (strand<any_io_executor>, tcp::socket's default executor)Boost ≥ 1.74 — the floor for the callback style; below it, use legacy io_context::strand
io_context, make_strand, expires_afterBoost ≥ 1.66 — below it, classic io_service

Distro floors that bite: Debian bookworm ships Boost 1.74 (no awaitable_operators.hpp — #include fails outright), Ubuntu 20.04 ships 1.71 (no any_io_executor), Debian 9 ships 1.62.

Language, not library: the chrono literals 250ms / 30s are C++14. For a true C++11 build write std::chrono::milliseconds(250).

Step 3: the rules that are actually easy to get wrong

A strand does not serialize writes. A strand serializes handler execution, not whole composed operations. Two async_writes in flight on the same strand still interleave bytes on the wire. Full-duplex (a read loop plus concurrent pushes/replies) needs a per-connection strand and an outbound queue with an in-flight flag, so at most one async_write exists at a time. This is the single most common wrong answer about Asio.

Buffers do not own memory. asio::buffer() is a view. Storage must outlive the operation: coroutine locals are fine across co_await in the same frame; in callback style the same data must become a member, not a local.

Connections must outlive their handlers. enable_shared_from_this, and capture self in every co_spawn / handler — read loop, write loop, and each timer.

Frame with composed reads. async_read (fills the buffer exactly) for a length prefix and then the body; never async_read_some, which returns short.

Wrap as_tuple. Always as_tuple(use_awaitable). Bare as_tuple resolves against the operation's default token and compiles in some contexts, fails in others.

async_accept(make_strand(...)) changes two things: it forces an explicit completion token back on the call, and the accepted socket is basic_stream_socket<tcp, strand<...>>, not tcp::socket. Take it by value or with auto — binding it to tcp::socket& will not compile.

Re-arming a timer resolves the pending wait with operation_aborted. In an idle-timeout loop that is the signal to keep waiting, not an error.

GCC needs -fcoroutines for the C++20 style, and header-only Boost needs BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY defined in exactly one place (CMake).

Anti-Patterns

MistakeFix
Buffer dangling (local goes out of scope during async op)Ensure buffer lifetime ≥ operation lifetime; coroutine locals or members, not callback locals
Forgetting io.run()No handlers dispatch without run() / run_one()
Concurrent socket access without strandWrap in strand<> or serialize via one coroutine chain
Assuming a strand prevents interleaved writesAdd a write queue — see Step 3
Using use_awaitable where deferred sufficesOmit the token (default is deferred) unless using || / &&
Ignoring short reads/writesUse composed async_read / async_write / async_read_until, not async_read_some
Not setting reuse_address on the acceptorSet before bind/listen or restarts hit "address in use"
SSL operations without a strandAll ssl::stream ops need strand synchronization
Blocking inside a handlerNever block in a completion handler
Accepting a socket with the wrong executor typeSee async_accept(make_strand(...)) in Step 3
Requiring the Boost::system componentHeader-only since 1.74: Boost::headers + BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY. Only classic (pre-1.66) needs the link
Missing -fcoroutines on GCCBuild fails — add $<$<CXX_COMPILER_ID:GNU>:-fcoroutines>
Writing coroutine code for a Boost that predates itDo Step 1 first

Boost.Asio vs standalone Asio

Same author, same API — namespace and includes differ.

AspectBoost.AsioStandalone Asio
Namespace / includeboost::asio / <boost/asio.hpp>asio / <asio.hpp>
Error codeboost::system::error_codeasio::error_code (or std::error_code)
Install (brew)brew install boostbrew install asio
CMakeBoost::headersmanual include path
Version (2025)1.87–1.90 (with Boost)1.30–1.36 (independent)
Macro prefixBOOST_ASIO_ASIO_

Support both with a shim, then use net:: throughout:

#ifdef USE_STANDALONE_ASIO
  #include <asio.hpp>
  namespace net = asio;
  using error_code = asio::error_code;
#else
  #include <boost/asio.hpp>
  namespace net = boost::asio;
  using error_code = boost::system::error_code;
#endif
namespace ssl = net::ssl;
using tcp = net::ip::tcp;

Before you call it done

Check the code you just wrote against this list:

  • Style matches the target Boost version and C++ standard (Step 1), and every API used clears its floor (Step 2).
  • Every buffer passed to an async op outlives that op — no callback locals, no dangling string_view.
  • At most one async_write per socket in flight, enforced by a queue + flag, if anything writes concurrently with reading.
  • Every async chain on a shared object runs on the same strand; self captured in every handler and co_spawn.
  • Framing / delimited reads use composed async_read / async_read_until.
  • Errors are handled, not swallowed: as_tuple(use_awaitable) destructured, or the callback's ec checked, on every op.
  • operation_aborted distinguished from real errors wherever a timer is re-armed or an op is cancelled.
  • Acceptor sets reuse_address; shutdown path closes the acceptor and drains sessions.
  • CMake has the standard, -fcoroutines for GCC (C++20 only), BOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY in one place, and Boost::coroutine only if using stackful spawn.
  • It compiles. Build it — most of the mistakes above are compile-time, and the version floors are only real once tested.

Worked examples

Three CI-verified implementations of the same full-duplex framed-protocol server, one per style — copy from the one matching Step 1. All three live in the upstream repository and are built by CI on every push.

Official documentation

Cross-References

  • engineering/docker-development — the old-Boost verification lanes this skill's floors come from are containerised builds (Debian 9 / bookworm, Fedora).
  • engineering/chaos-engineering — for exercising the failure paths this skill tells you to handle: half-open sockets, idle timeouts, partial frames.
  • engineering-team/playwright-pro — the client-side counterpart when the server built here is driven from browser-based integration tests.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a11y-audit

FreeSummary

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

ab-test-setup

FreeSummary

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

ad-creative

FreeSummary

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

aeo

FreeSummary

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.4KUpdated Aug 30, 2026

See all skills by alirezarezvani

Report a problem with this skill