Review contracts, investment terms, and employment arrangements through six legal lenses. Identify key risks, organize negotiation priorities, and prepare specific questions for outside counsel before making commitments.
/c-level-agents:gc-review [plan] — General Counsel interrogation of contracts, IP, regulatory, term sheets, and employment-law surface. Use when reviewing a term sheet before signing, redlining a customer MSA, or checking IP assignment and regulatory exposure on a new product.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Command: /c-level-agents:gc-review <plan>
The General Counsel lens. Six questions before any contract, term sheet, IP move, or regulatory commitment. This is a lane gstack has zero of — and one where a single missed clause costs more than a year of engineering.
⚠️ Not legal advice. This command surfaces the right questions to ask before talking to outside counsel. Always engage qualified counsel for binding decisions.
Who owns the IP being created or shared in this transaction?
What's the liability cap, and what's carved out from it?
What personal data is involved, and is a DPA in place?
What's the termination right, what's the notice period, and what's auto-renew?
Does this expose the company to a new regulatory regime?
If this is a hire or contractor: jurisdiction, classification, equity grant, IP assignment?
# GC Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Document
- Type: <contract / term sheet / grant / DPA>
- Counterparty: <name>
- $ value or scope: <amount>
## Issues
| # | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <e.g., uncapped IP indemnity> | HIGH | Cap at fees paid, mutual |
| 2 | <e.g., 5-year auto-renew> | MED | 1-year max, 60-day notice |
| 3 | <e.g., no DPA, EU data> | HIGH | Require DPA before sign |
## Regulatory Trigger
- New regime triggered? <yes/no>
- Specific frameworks: <HIPAA / GDPR / etc.>
## Outside Counsel Action Items
- [ ] <specific item 1>
- [ ] <specific item 2>
- [ ] <specific item 3>
## Verdict
🟢 SIGN AS-IS (rare)
🟡 NEGOTIATE — counter on top-3 issues
🔴 DO NOT SIGN — material risk
/c-level-agents:ciso-review — for any data-touching contract/c-level-agents:cfo-review — for any commitment > 1 year or > 1% of revenue/c-level-agents:decide — log the verdict after outside counsel reviewgeneral-counsel-advisor skillSince v2.5.1, this command is backed by a full skill at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor/ with two Python tools:
# Automated contract scan (12 founder-killer patterns)
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py path/to/contract.txt
# Term sheet scoring (0-100 founder-friendliness)
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py path/to/term_sheet.json
The cs-general-counsel-advisor agent orchestrates both tools plus 3 references (contracts playbook, IP + regulatory, term sheet decoder).
general-counsel-advisor — full skill with Python tools + referencescs-general-counsel-advisor../../../ra-qm-team/${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/vendor/c-level-advisor/ma-playbook/Version: 1.0.0
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.
Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.
Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.
Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.
Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.
Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.