Prepare for a GDPR audit with six structured questions covering processing records, lawful grounds, privacy risks, individual rights requests, international transfers, and breaches. Organize findings with article references and identify the next three actions.
/cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope> — GDPR audit 6-question Article-cited forcing interrogation. Use before annual internal GDPR review, post-breach internal audit, DPA investigation readiness, or acquisition due diligence.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Command: /cs:gdpr-audit-prep <scope>
The GDPR DPO auditor pressure-tests any privacy compliance work. Six Article-cited questions before any internal audit, breach response, DPA investigation, or acquisition due diligence.
Most-cited finding area.
Article 6 is exclusive — pick ONE basis per purpose.
Required for high-risk; sample 3-5 activities.
Articles 15-22 operational workflow.
Schrems II discipline.
Article 33(5) requires logging ALL breaches.
# 1. Compliance posture
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/gdpr_compliance_checker.py compliance_state.json
# 2. DPIA for high-risk activities
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/dpia_generator.py processing_activity.json
# 3. DSAR workflow validation
python ra-qm-team/skills/gdpr-dsgvo-expert/scripts/data_subject_rights_tracker.py dsar_log.json
# 4. Cross-framework reuse with ISO 27001 + SOC 2 + ISO 42001
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/cross_framework_mapper.py program.json
# GDPR Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Article Citations:** Every finding cites Article + paragraph; no paraphrase.
## The Decision Being Made
[RoPA-refresh | DPIA-required | DSAR-workflow | transfer-risk | breach-followup | DPA-readiness]
## Article 30 RoPA Status
- Last refresh: YYYY-MM-DD
- Required elements present: yes/no per processing activity
- Joint controller arrangements: documented/missing
## Article 6 Lawful Basis Discipline
- Activities reviewed: N
- Legitimate-interests claims without LIA: <list>
- Article 9 special categories with documented exception: yes/no
## Article 35 DPIA Quality
- High-risk activities requiring DPIA: <list>
- DPIAs complete per Article 35(7): pass/fail per activity
- Article 36 prior consultation triggered: <list>
## Data Subject Rights (Articles 12-22)
- DSARs in last 90 days: N
- Average response time: X days (target: ≤ 30)
- Right to erasure backup-processor flow: complete/incomplete
## Article 28 Processor Management
- Processors reviewed: N
- Contracts with all Article 28(3)(a)-(j) clauses: % complete
- Sub-processor flow-down notification mechanism: yes/no
## Schrems II Transfer Status
- Non-EU transfers: <list>
- Mechanism per transfer: adequacy / SCCs / derogation
- TIA on file: yes/no per transfer
- Supplementary measures where needed: <list>
## Article 33-34 Breach Discipline
- Breach log last 12 months: N
- Article 33 notification timing: ≤ 72h ratio
- Article 34 data subject notification (where high risk): on-time ratio
## Cross-Framework Impact
- ISO 27001 Article 32 alignment: clean / gaps
- EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration: applicable / not
- SOC 2 Privacy TSC alignment (if scope): clean / gaps
## Verdict
🟢 DPA-READY | 🟡 GAPS-IDENTIFIED | 🔴 NOT-READY
## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + Article-cited timeline]
## Outside Counsel Required
[Article-level ambiguities flagged: Schrems II supplementary measure adequacy, EU AI Act ↔ GDPR interaction, sectoral derogation interpretation, novel DPA enforcement]
/cs:compliance-readiness — for multi-framework view/cs:iso27001-audit-prep — for Article 32 organizational measures/cs:ai-act-readiness — for EU AI Act Article 27 FRIA integration/cs:soc2-audit-prep — for SOC 2 Privacy TSC overlap/cs:gc-review — for novel-case legal reviewcs-dpo-gdprgdpr-dsgvo-expert../iso27001-audit-prep/, ../ai-act-readiness/, ../soc2-audit-prep/, ../compliance-readiness/Version: 1.0.0
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.
Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.
Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.
Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.
Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.
Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.