Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

minimalist

Keep implementation small by checking whether work is needed, then considering existing code, standard libraries, platform features, and installed dependencies. Helps avoid unnecessary packages, helper classes, and boilerplate before writing new code.

OriginalShow the original description

Use when the user asks to write code efficiently, avoid over-engineering, reduce dependencies, or prevent unnecessary abstractions. Enforces a strict efficiency ladder: YAGNI, reuse, stdlib, native platform, existing deps — before writing any new code.

See how to install

Good for

  • Implementing a feature with minimal code
  • Avoiding unnecessary package installations
  • Reusing existing helpers and platform features
  • Preventing excessive abstractions in a small change

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Minimalist

You are highly efficient. The best code is the code never written.

Overview

Use this skill whenever the goal is to solve a problem with the least code possible. It prevents common AI failure modes: inventing helper classes for single-use logic, installing packages for one-line operations, and producing boilerplate that the user will never need.

The Efficiency Ladder

Before writing any new code, stop at the first rung that holds:

  1. YAGNI — Does this need to be built at all? If the user hasn't asked for it, don't build it.
  2. Reuse — Does it already exist in this codebase? Find the helper, util, or pattern and reuse it.
  3. Standard Library — Does the standard library already do this? Use it directly.
  4. Native Platform — Does a native platform feature cover it? Use it.
  5. Existing Dependency — Does an already-installed dependency solve it? Use it.
  6. One-Liner — Can this be one line? Make it one line.
  7. Minimum Code — Only then, write the minimum code that works.

Rules of Engagement

  • No unrequested abstractions: Do not invent interfaces, base classes, or generics for future-proofing unless the user explicitly asks.
  • No unnecessary dependencies: If the standard library can do it cleanly, do not install a package.
  • No boilerplate: Deletion over addition. Boring over clever. Fewest files possible.
  • Question complex requests: Ask "Do you actually need X, or does Y cover it?" before building X.
  • Shortest working diff wins: But only once you understand the problem. The smallest change in the wrong place isn't lazy — it's a second bug.

Workflow

When asked to implement something:

  1. Pause before writing code.
  2. Walk the ladder — can rungs 1–6 resolve this without new code?
  3. State your decision — "Using stdlib pathlib instead of a custom file helper."
  4. Write minimum code only if the ladder doesn't resolve it.
  5. Do not add comments, logging, or error handling that wasn't asked for.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhat to do instead
Installing a package for a one-linerUse the standard library
Writing a class for a single functionWrite the function
Adding a config file for a single hardcoded valueHardcode it until there are 2+ uses
Creating a utility module before it's reused anywhereWrite inline, extract later
Adding docstrings/comments the user didn't ask forSkip them
Building error handling for errors that can't happenSkip it
Adding logging before the code worksShip the code first

Cross-References

  • Related: engineering/strict-api — prevents hallucinated APIs when writing minimal code; use together.
  • Related: engineering/zero-hallucination-coder — enforces verified-only API usage.
  • Related: engineering/karpathy-coder — Karpathy-inspired behavioral guidelines for LLM-assisted coding.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a11y-audit

FreeSummary

Audit web applications for accessibility issues against WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA, the web accessibility standards. Get framework-specific code fixes, contrast checks, verification steps, and reports, with options for automated checks in development pipelines.

  • Audit a web application before release
  • Fix contrast and keyboard navigation issues
  • Prepare accessibility reports for stakeholders
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

ab-test-setup

FreeSummary

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

  • Comparing landing page headlines
  • Testing signup button changes
  • Planning pricing page experiments
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

ad-creative

FreeSummary

Create paid ad headlines and body copy tailored to each platform's character limits. Use existing performance data to develop variations, explore new messaging angles, and check copy for length, quality, and potential rejection risks.

  • Creating Google RSA headlines
  • Writing Meta and LinkedIn ad copy
  • Developing variations of successful ads
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Review code changes from three critical perspectives: production failures, maintainability, and security. Get a consolidated report that ranks findings by severity and provides merge guidance, helping examine assumptions that an ordinary self-review may overlook.

  • Reviewing a pull request before merging
  • Getting a second opinion on AI-written code
  • Checking authentication or data access code
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

aeo

FreeSummary

Audit and improve content intended for citation in AI answers. Review evidence, author information, and structure, generate revised content and structured metadata, and keep a local record of observed citations across AI services.

  • Audit existing articles for evidence and credibility gaps
  • Revise article structure and references for AI answers
  • Record citations observed across AI services
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Create signed records for consequential agent actions such as deployments, deletions, and payments. Decide which actions need evidence, record the agent, action, target, and policy, then verify the resulting certificate offline to detect later changes.

  • Creating signed records for production deployments
  • Preserving evidence of deletions and payments
  • Recording access grants for later review
alirezarezvani/claude-skills28.5KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by alirezarezvani

Report a problem with this skill