Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

building-role-mining-for-rbac-optimization

Apply bottom-up and top-down role mining techniques to discover optimal RBAC roles from existing user-permission assignments, reducing role explosion and enforcing least privilege.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (7)

  • SKILL.md9.9 KB
  • assets/template.md1.3 KB
  • references/api-reference.md1.7 KB
  • references/standards.md1.6 KB
  • references/workflows.md2.9 KB
  • scripts/agent.py6.4 KB
  • scripts/process.py9.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Building Role Mining for RBAC Optimization

Overview

Role mining is the process of analyzing existing user-permission assignments to discover optimal roles for a Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) system. Organizations accumulate excessive permissions over time through job changes, project assignments, and ad-hoc access grants, leading to "role explosion" where thousands of granular roles exist with significant overlap. Role mining uses data analysis -- including clustering algorithms, formal concept analysis, and graph-based methods -- to consolidate permissions into a minimal set of roles that accurately represent business functions while enforcing least privilege.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring building role mining for rbac optimization capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Export of current user-permission assignments (CSV/database)
  • Identity governance platform or directory service access
  • Python 3.9+ with pandas, scikit-learn, numpy
  • Understanding of organizational structure and job functions
  • Stakeholder access for role validation workshops

Core Concepts

Role Mining Approaches

ApproachDescriptionBest For
Bottom-UpAnalyze existing permissions to discover common patternsLarge datasets with organic permission growth
Top-DownDesign roles from business requirements and job descriptionsGreenfield RBAC or organizational restructuring
HybridCombine bottom-up analysis with top-down business validationMost production environments

Role Mining Algorithms

1. Permission Clustering: Group users with similar permission sets using k-means or hierarchical clustering. Users in the same cluster share a common role.

2. Formal Concept Analysis (FCA): Mathematical framework that identifies complete set of concepts (user groups sharing exact permission sets) from a binary user-permission matrix.

3. Graph-Based Mining: Model users and permissions as a bipartite graph, then find dense subgraphs representing candidate roles.

4. Boolean Matrix Decomposition: Decompose the user-permission matrix U into U ≈ R × P where R maps users to roles and P maps roles to permissions.

Role Mining Metrics

MetricFormulaTarget
Role CountTotal distinct roles after miningMinimize
CoveragePermissions explained by mined roles / Total permissions> 95%
Weighted Structural Complexity (WSC)Sum of role-user + role-permission assignmentsMinimize
DeviationExtra permissions not covered by assigned roles< 5%

Workflow

Step 1: Extract User-Permission Data

Collect the current access state from all identity sources:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

# Load user-permission assignments
# Format: user_id, permission_id (one row per assignment)
assignments = pd.read_csv("user_permissions.csv")

# Create binary user-permission matrix (UPA matrix)
upa_matrix = assignments.pivot_table(
    index="user_id",
    columns="permission_id",
    aggfunc="size",
    fill_value=0
)
upa_matrix = (upa_matrix > 0).astype(int)

print(f"Users: {upa_matrix.shape[0]}")
print(f"Permissions: {upa_matrix.shape[1]}")
print(f"Assignments: {assignments.shape[0]}")
print(f"Density: {upa_matrix.values.sum() / upa_matrix.size:.2%}")

Step 2: Bottom-Up Role Discovery Using Clustering

from sklearn.cluster import AgglomerativeClustering
from sklearn.metrics import silhouette_score

def find_optimal_clusters(matrix, max_k=50):
    """Find optimal number of roles using silhouette analysis."""
    scores = []
    for k in range(2, min(max_k, matrix.shape[0])):
        clustering = AgglomerativeClustering(
            n_clusters=k, metric="jaccard", linkage="average"
        )
        labels = clustering.fit_predict(matrix)
        score = silhouette_score(matrix, labels, metric="jaccard")
        scores.append((k, score))

    optimal_k = max(scores, key=lambda x: x[1])[0]
    return optimal_k, scores

def mine_roles_clustering(upa_matrix, n_clusters):
    """Mine roles using hierarchical clustering on Jaccard distance."""
    clustering = AgglomerativeClustering(
        n_clusters=n_clusters, metric="jaccard", linkage="average"
    )
    user_matrix = upa_matrix.values
    labels = clustering.fit_predict(user_matrix)

    roles = {}
    for cluster_id in range(n_clusters):
        cluster_users = upa_matrix.index[labels == cluster_id]
        cluster_permissions = upa_matrix.loc[cluster_users]

        # Core role = permissions held by >80% of cluster members
        permission_frequency = cluster_permissions.mean()
        core_permissions = permission_frequency[permission_frequency >= 0.8].index.tolist()

        roles[f"Role_{cluster_id}"] = {
            "permissions": core_permissions,
            "user_count": len(cluster_users),
            "users": cluster_users.tolist(),
            "coverage": permission_frequency[permission_frequency >= 0.8].mean()
        }

    return roles, labels

Step 3: Formal Concept Analysis

def mine_roles_fca(upa_matrix, min_support=3):
    """Mine roles using Formal Concept Analysis (frequent closed itemsets)."""
    from itertools import combinations

    users = upa_matrix.index.tolist()
    permissions = upa_matrix.columns.tolist()

    concepts = []

    # Find all maximal permission sets shared by at least min_support users
    for size in range(len(permissions), 0, -1):
        for perm_combo in combinations(permissions, size):
            perm_set = set(perm_combo)
            # Find users who have ALL permissions in this set
            matching_users = []
            for user in users:
                user_perms = set(upa_matrix.columns[upa_matrix.loc[user] == 1])
                if perm_set.issubset(user_perms):
                    matching_users.append(user)

            if len(matching_users) >= min_support:
                # Check if this is a closed concept (no superset with same extent)
                is_closed = True
                for concept in concepts:
                    if set(matching_users) == set(concept["users"]) and \
                       perm_set.issubset(set(concept["permissions"])):
                        is_closed = False
                        break

                if is_closed:
                    concepts.append({
                        "permissions": list(perm_set),
                        "users": matching_users,
                        "support": len(matching_users)
                    })

        if len(concepts) > 100:  # Limit for performance
            break

    return concepts

Step 4: Evaluate and Select Roles

def evaluate_role_set(roles, upa_matrix):
    """Evaluate the quality of a mined role set."""
    total_assignments = upa_matrix.values.sum()
    covered_assignments = 0
    extra_assignments = 0

    for role_name, role_data in roles.items():
        role_perms = set(role_data["permissions"])
        for user in role_data["users"]:
            user_perms = set(upa_matrix.columns[upa_matrix.loc[user] == 1])
            covered = role_perms.intersection(user_perms)
            extra = role_perms - user_perms
            covered_assignments += len(covered)
            extra_assignments += len(extra)

    metrics = {
        "total_roles": len(roles),
        "total_assignments": total_assignments,
        "covered_assignments": covered_assignments,
        "coverage_rate": covered_assignments / total_assignments if total_assignments else 0,
        "extra_permissions": extra_assignments,
        "deviation_rate": extra_assignments / (covered_assignments + extra_assignments) if (covered_assignments + extra_assignments) else 0,
        "avg_role_size": np.mean([len(r["permissions"]) for r in roles.values()]),
        "avg_users_per_role": np.mean([r["user_count"] for r in roles.values()]),
    }
    return metrics

Step 5: Business Validation

After mining candidate roles:

  1. Map mined roles to business functions (department, job title)
  2. Conduct workshops with business unit managers to validate role definitions
  3. Identify outlier permissions that indicate misconfiguration
  4. Refine roles based on feedback and re-evaluate metrics
  5. Document role definitions with business justification

Validation Checklist

  • User-permission matrix extracted from all identity sources
  • Multiple mining algorithms compared (clustering, FCA)
  • Optimal role count determined via silhouette analysis or WSC
  • Coverage rate exceeds 95% of existing assignments
  • Deviation rate below 5% (minimal extra permissions)
  • Mined roles validated with business stakeholders
  • Role hierarchy defined (parent-child inheritance)
  • Exception/outlier permissions documented
  • Migration plan created for transitioning to new role model
  • Ongoing role governance process defined

References

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Extract DPAPI-protected secrets such as credentials and browser data offline and online.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

Audit, detect, and remediate Shadow Credentials misconfigurations on msDS-KeyCredentialLink in Active Directory. Focuses on access-controls, monitoring Event ID 5136, and credential-management hygiene.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3 to identify GenericAll, WriteDACL, and WriteOwner abuse paths

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware samples using apktool for decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for permission analysis, manifest inspection, and suspicious API call detection.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

andycungkrinx91/konoha10Updated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by andycungkrinx91

Report a problem with this skill