Skip to content
cccskills
Official · ClaudeFreePublished on GitHub

customize

Adjust an existing litigation practice profile through a guided conversation. Update roles, risk thresholds, document styles, contacts, or workflow settings one change at a time, with an explanation of downstream effects and checks for inconsistent settings.

OriginalShow the original description

Guided customization of your litigation practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust practice role, side (plaintiff / defense / mixed), risk calibration, landscape, house style, escalation contacts, severity vocabulary, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my config", or "customize".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Updating litigation risk thresholds
  • Changing document styles and templates
  • Updating outside counsel and escalation contacts
  • Adjusting matter workspace paths and workflow settings

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/customize

When this runs

The user typed /litigation-legal:customize. They want to change something in their litigation profile — a risk calibration, a house style rule, an escalation contact, a landscape note — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML.

What to do

  1. Read the config. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md (and ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md one level up). If the plugin config does not exist or still contains [PLACEHOLDER] values, say:

    You haven't run setup yet. Run /litigation-legal:cold-start-interview first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have.

  2. Show the customizable map. List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value:

    • Company / who you are — name, industry, jurisdictions, stage, practice setting (shared across all 12 plugins — changes flow through company-profile.md)
    • Practice role — in-house counsel / outside counsel / solo / clinic
    • Side — plaintiff / defense / mixed, and any posture nuances (class action defense, regulatory enforcement defense, commercial plaintiff, etc.)
    • Risk calibration — what counts as high / medium / low risk on an inbound demand, subpoena, or new matter; escalation triggers
    • Landscape — regular adversaries, friendly and unfriendly venues, judges to know, standing OC relationships
    • House style — brief style, declaration format, demand letter template, deposition outline structure, legal hold template
    • Severity vocabulary map — how you translate severity labels across client / internal / court-facing outputs
    • People — matter leads, in-house team, outside counsel by matter type, escalation chain
    • Workflow — matter workspaces, portfolio log, OC status cadence, legal hold refresh cadence
    • Integrations — document storage / e-filing / calendar / Slack status, fallbacks
  3. Ask what they want to change.

    What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in your own words.

  4. Make the change. Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config.

    Examples:

    • Side mixed → defense-only: "/matter-intake will stop asking the plaintiff-side questions. /demand-draft will still work for defense-side pre-suit demands but the starting frame will be different."
    • Risk calibration tightening high-risk threshold: "More inbound demands and subpoenas will route through /matter-briefing and /oc-status."
    • New standing OC for IP matters: "/oc-status will include this firm in weekly sweeps for IP-tagged matters."
  5. For shared-profile changes (company name, industry, jurisdictions, practice setting, stage): write to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md and note:

    This change affects all 12 plugins — any plugin that reads your jurisdiction footprint now sees [new value].

  6. Close.

    Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can run /litigation-legal:customize anytime.

Guardrails

  • Never delete a section. If the user wants to "remove" a matter type from scope, offer to mark it [Not currently handled] and explain what intake routing changes.
  • Flag internal inconsistency. If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., plaintiff-only side + defense-only OC roster; or "high volume" portfolio + no matter workspaces configured), flag the tension.
  • Flag guardrail degradation. The FRE 408 / privilege gate on /demand-draft, the privilege header on matter outputs, source attribution tags, and [verify] tags on cited authorities are load- bearing — do not remove. The [review] flag and the "do not file without attorney review" framing are load-bearing.
  • One change at a time. Don't re-ask the whole interview.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

ai-inventory

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Build an AI system register for EU AI Act reviews. Track owners, deployment status, EU connections, and each system’s role and risk category through a guided discussion, preserving classification reasons and dates for future review.

  • Register AI systems used or planned across an organization
  • Review each system’s role and risk category
  • Find systems approaching their next review date
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

ai-tool-handoff

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Coordinate bulk contract clause extraction with Luminance or Kira, prepare loading requests, and check returned results according to your team's review settings. Assess flagged clauses against the transaction and organize findings and required consents.

  • Preparing bulk clause extraction requests for contract batches
  • Sampling AI extraction results against original clauses
  • Checking whether change-of-control clauses apply to a deal
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

aia-generation

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Create an AI impact assessment in your team's format. Gather system details through conversation, analyze risks and applicable regulatory classifications, check consistency with internal policy, and document recommendations, safeguards, and conditions for deployment.

  • Assessing an AI system before deployment
  • Preparing an assessment after conditional triage
  • Reviewing pilot or production AI risks
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

amendment-history

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Trace changes across an original contract and its amendments. Get a chronological overview or follow one clause through successive revisions, with section references, current wording, and flags for conflicting or unclear language that needs legal review.

  • Summarize a contract’s amendment history
  • Find the current wording of a specific clause
  • Track changes to fees or liability limits
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

auto-updater

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Check installed community skills for updates, review file changes and expanded permissions, and flag outdated references. Updates require explicit approval, with backups available to restore the previous version if needed.

  • Check installed skills for available updates
  • Review permission changes before updating
  • Identify references overdue for verification
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

bar-prep-questions

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Practice for a U.S. bar exam with questions matched to the exam format, jurisdiction, and weak subjects. Get explanations for answer choices, essay feedback, and session records that reveal recurring mistakes and guide further practice.

  • Drilling weak subjects for a specific bar exam
  • Comparing general rules with state-specific rules
  • Getting feedback on practice essays
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by anthropics

Report a problem with this skill