Skip to content
cccskills
Official · ClaudeFreePublished on GitHub

customize

Update an existing university legal clinic profile through guided questions. Change jurisdiction, supervision, practice templates, semester settings, or output safeguards, with explanations of workflow effects and checks for inconsistent settings.

OriginalShow the original description

Guided customization of your legal clinic profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust clinic profile, jurisdiction, supervision style, practice-area templates, semester configuration, or output safeguards. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "new semester", "add a practice area", "update my config", or "customize".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Updating clinic settings for a new semester
  • Adding or archiving a practice area
  • Changing supervisor review procedures
  • Adjusting jurisdiction and client document standards

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/customize

When this runs

The user typed /legal-clinic:customize. They (usually the professor, sometimes a student) want to change something in the clinic profile — a jurisdiction, a supervision style, a practice-area template, a semester rollover — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML.

What to do

  1. Read the config. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md. If the plugin config does not exist or still contains [PLACEHOLDER] values, say:

    You haven't run setup yet. Run /legal-clinic:cold-start-interview first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have.

  2. Show the customizable map. List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value:

    • Clinic profile — clinic name, host school, faculty lead, active practice areas, case type limits
    • Jurisdiction — primary state, courts, agencies, local rules path
    • Supervision style — informal vs. formal review queue; if formal, who reviews what before it goes out
    • Practice-area templates — which templates are active (immigration, housing, small business, family, expungement, etc.) and any local overrides
    • Semester — current semester, active students, rollover rules, handoff memo format
    • Output safeguards — plain-language standards for client-facing outputs, deadline warning rules, privilege labeling
    • Seed documents — clinic handbook, jurisdiction rules, template letters, sample memos, form libraries
    • Outputs — supervisor guide format, client letter templates, memo scaffolds
    • Workflow — case directories, deadline tracker location, review queue channel
    • Integrations — document storage / Slack / court e-filing status, fallbacks
  3. Ask what they want to change.

    What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in your own words.

  4. Make the change. Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config.

    Examples:

    • Adding a new practice area: "/client-intake will route matters of this type through the new template. /draft, /memo, and /client-letter will use the practice-area prompts. /research-start will add the corresponding Westlaw search terms."
    • Supervision style informal → formal review queue: "/supervisor-review-queue becomes active — student output will land there for supervisor sign-off before it goes to the client."
    • New semester rollover: "I'll archive the prior semester's active cases, carry forward matters you flag as continuing, and prompt the incoming students through /ramp."
  5. Close.

    Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can run /legal-clinic:customize anytime.

Guardrails

  • Never delete a section. If the user wants to "drop" a practice area, offer to mark it [Archived] and explain that archiving keeps case history accessible but hides the template from /client-intake routing.
  • Flag internal inconsistency. If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., formal review queue on + informal supervision note; or practice area on + no jurisdiction rules configured), flag the tension.
  • Flag guardrail degradation. These are load-bearing and should not be removed: the "NOT final work product" framing on /draft, plain-language standards on client-facing outputs, "does NOT decide case acceptance" on /client-intake, "NOT substantive advice" on /client-letter, and the scaffold-not-analysis framing on /memo. These exist because students ship work product — if the safeguards go, the risk of student work reaching a client without supervisor review goes up. Confirm the trade-off with the user, and if they're a student rather than the professor, suggest they discuss it with the supervisor first.
  • One change at a time. Don't re-ask the whole interview.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

ai-inventory

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Build an AI system register for EU AI Act reviews. Track owners, deployment status, EU connections, and each system’s role and risk category through a guided discussion, preserving classification reasons and dates for future review.

  • Register AI systems used or planned across an organization
  • Review each system’s role and risk category
  • Find systems approaching their next review date
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

ai-tool-handoff

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Coordinate bulk contract clause extraction with Luminance or Kira, prepare loading requests, and check returned results according to your team's review settings. Assess flagged clauses against the transaction and organize findings and required consents.

  • Preparing bulk clause extraction requests for contract batches
  • Sampling AI extraction results against original clauses
  • Checking whether change-of-control clauses apply to a deal
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

aia-generation

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Create an AI impact assessment in your team's format. Gather system details through conversation, analyze risks and applicable regulatory classifications, check consistency with internal policy, and document recommendations, safeguards, and conditions for deployment.

  • Assessing an AI system before deployment
  • Preparing an assessment after conditional triage
  • Reviewing pilot or production AI risks
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

amendment-history

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Trace changes across an original contract and its amendments. Get a chronological overview or follow one clause through successive revisions, with section references, current wording, and flags for conflicting or unclear language that needs legal review.

  • Summarize a contract’s amendment history
  • Find the current wording of a specific clause
  • Track changes to fees or liability limits
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

auto-updater

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Check installed community skills for updates, review file changes and expanded permissions, and flag outdated references. Updates require explicit approval, with backups available to restore the previous version if needed.

  • Check installed skills for available updates
  • Review permission changes before updating
  • Identify references overdue for verification
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

bar-prep-questions

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Practice for a U.S. bar exam with questions matched to the exam format, jurisdiction, and weak subjects. Get explanations for answer choices, essay feedback, and session records that reveal recurring mistakes and guide further practice.

  • Drilling weak subjects for a specific bar exam
  • Comparing general rules with state-specific rules
  • Getting feedback on practice essays
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by anthropics

Report a problem with this skill