Skip to content
cccskills
Official · ClaudeFreePublished on GitHub

customize

Update an existing regulatory practice profile through guided, one-at-a-time changes. Adjust watched regulators, significance thresholds, policy references, feeds, or workflows while reviewing how each change affects related tasks and shared company settings.

OriginalShow the original description

Guided customization of your regulatory practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust watched regulators, policy library index, materiality threshold, gap response process, feed configuration, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "add a regulator", "update my watchlist", "edit my threshold", or "customize".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding a regulator to the watchlist
  • Adjusting thresholds for regulatory updates
  • Updating internal policy references and owners
  • Changing feed settings or workspace paths

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/customize

When this runs

The user typed /regulatory-legal:customize. They want to change something in their regulatory profile — a watched regulator, a materiality threshold, a feed source — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML.

What to do

  1. Read the config. Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md (and ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md one level up). If the plugin config does not exist or still contains [PLACEHOLDER] values, say:

    You haven't run setup yet. Run /regulatory-legal:cold-start-interview first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have.

  2. Show the customizable map. List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value:

    • Company / who you are — name, industry, jurisdictions, stage, practice setting (shared across all 12 plugins — changes flow through company-profile.md)
    • Regulators we watch — agencies / bodies / SROs / state regulators in scope, and which are "leading" (most likely to drive policy impact) vs. "monitor"
    • Policy library — the internal policies the library indexes, path to each, owner per policy
    • Materiality threshold — when a regulatory change rises to "notable" vs. "report" vs. "digest only"; how this threshold filters /reg-feed-watcher output
    • Gap response process — who triages, SLA per severity, downstream owners (policy, product, training)
    • Feed configuration — regulator feeds, paid feed connectors, cadence of the /reg-feed-watcher sweep, digest channel
    • People — regulatory counsel, policy owners, comment drafter, escalation chain
    • Workflow — matter workspaces, open gaps tracker, comment deadline tracker, digest publication cadence
    • Integrations — regulatory feeds / Slack / document storage status, fallbacks
  3. Ask what they want to change.

    What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in your own words.

  4. Make the change. Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config.

    Examples:

    • Adding a regulator to the watchlist: "/reg-feed-watcher will sweep this regulator on its next run. /policy-diff will accept inputs from this regulator's rulemaking feed."
    • Tightening materiality threshold: "/reg-feed-watcher digest will be shorter — items below the new threshold will drop from the weekly digest but stay searchable."
    • New policy added to the library: "/policy-diff will include this policy when matching new rules against the library. The comment tracker will tag comments affecting this policy."
  5. For shared-profile changes (company name, industry, jurisdictions, practice setting, stage): write to ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/company-profile.md and note:

    This change affects all 12 plugins — any plugin that reads your jurisdiction footprint now sees [new value].

  6. Close.

    Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can run /regulatory-legal:customize anytime.

Guardrails

  • Never delete a section. If the user wants to "drop" a regulator, offer to mark it [Monitor only] and explain that monitoring keeps the feed in the archive but pulls it out of the active digest.
  • Flag internal inconsistency. If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., regulator in scope + no jurisdiction in the footprint that the regulator covers; or "weekly digest" + materiality threshold that yields fewer than one item a quarter), flag the tension.
  • Flag guardrail degradation. [verify] tags on cited regulations, source attribution on feed pulls, and the [review] flag on gap triage are load-bearing — do not remove. Materiality threshold can be adjusted, but lowering it below the point where the digest becomes noise is the point — warn if that's the direction.
  • One change at a time. Don't re-ask the whole interview.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

ai-inventory

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Build an AI system register for EU AI Act reviews. Track owners, deployment status, EU connections, and each system’s role and risk category through a guided discussion, preserving classification reasons and dates for future review.

  • Register AI systems used or planned across an organization
  • Review each system’s role and risk category
  • Find systems approaching their next review date
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

ai-tool-handoff

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Coordinate bulk contract clause extraction with Luminance or Kira, prepare loading requests, and check returned results according to your team's review settings. Assess flagged clauses against the transaction and organize findings and required consents.

  • Preparing bulk clause extraction requests for contract batches
  • Sampling AI extraction results against original clauses
  • Checking whether change-of-control clauses apply to a deal
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

aia-generation

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Create an AI impact assessment in your team's format. Gather system details through conversation, analyze risks and applicable regulatory classifications, check consistency with internal policy, and document recommendations, safeguards, and conditions for deployment.

  • Assessing an AI system before deployment
  • Preparing an assessment after conditional triage
  • Reviewing pilot or production AI risks
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

amendment-history

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Trace changes across an original contract and its amendments. Get a chronological overview or follow one clause through successive revisions, with section references, current wording, and flags for conflicting or unclear language that needs legal review.

  • Summarize a contract’s amendment history
  • Find the current wording of a specific clause
  • Track changes to fees or liability limits
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

auto-updater

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Check installed community skills for updates, review file changes and expanded permissions, and flag outdated references. Updates require explicit approval, with backups available to restore the previous version if needed.

  • Check installed skills for available updates
  • Review permission changes before updating
  • Identify references overdue for verification
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

bar-prep-questions

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Practice for a U.S. bar exam with questions matched to the exam format, jurisdiction, and weak subjects. Get explanations for answer choices, essay feedback, and session records that reveal recurring mistakes and guide further practice.

  • Drilling weak subjects for a specific bar exam
  • Comparing general rules with state-specific rules
  • Getting feedback on practice essays
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by anthropics

Report a problem with this skill