Skip to content
cccskills
Official · ClaudeFreePublished on GitHub

status

Turn legal clinic case notes into status update drafts for clients, supervising professors, or courts. Adjust language, detail, and format for each reader, covering recent progress, upcoming events, outstanding issues, and next steps as appropriate.

OriginalShow the original description

Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Drafting a plain-language client update
  • Briefing a supervising professor on case progress
  • Preparing a court status report draft
  • Organizing deadlines and questions for supervision

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/status

  1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md → supervision style, plain-language standards, jurisdiction.
  2. Use the workflow below. Read case notes.
  3. Generate for the specified audience:
    • client — plain language, what happened/next/you do/reach us
    • internal — procedural posture, done since last check-in, upcoming, needs professor input, student's assessment
    • court — formal status report in caption format per local rules
  4. Supervision routing per audience (client-facing and court-ready usually flag).
/legal-clinic:status client
/legal-clinic:status internal
/legal-clinic:status court

Status: Audience-Aware Case Summaries

Purpose

Clinics generate enormous numbers of status updates — to clients, to professors, to co-counsel, to courts. Same case, same facts, completely different documents. This skill takes the case notes and produces the right summary for the right reader.

Load context

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md → supervision style, plain-language standards (for client-facing), jurisdiction. Case notes for facts.

Audience modes

Client-facing

Reader: The client. Probably stressed. Possibly unfamiliar with legal process. Reading level per ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md plain-language standards (default 6th grade).

Include:

  • What's happened since they last heard from the clinic
  • What's happening next and when
  • What (if anything) they need to do
  • How to reach the clinic

Don't include:

  • Legal analysis (they don't need to know the IRAC)
  • Weaknesses in their case (unless it's time to have that conversation — and that's a call for the professor, not a status update)
  • Jargon

Review label for the student (not for the client — strip before sending): [AI-ASSISTED DRAFT — requires student review and supervision step per plugin config]

Check your jurisdiction's student practice rule for required law-student sign-off language; some jurisdictions require specific forms.

Dear [Client],

I wanted to update you on your case.

**What's happened:** [Plain English. "We filed your answer with the court on
[date]" not "The responsive pleading was submitted."]

**What's next:** [What and when. "The court scheduled a hearing for [date] at
[time]. You need to be there." Or: "We're waiting for the landlord's lawyer
to respond. That could take a few weeks."]

**What you need to do:** [Specific and clear. Or: "Nothing right now — we'll
let you know when we need something from you."]

**How to reach us:** [Clinic phone, hours, student name]

[Student name]
Law Student, Certified Legal Intern
Under the supervision of [Supervising Attorney]
[Clinic name]

Before sending: sending a client status update is a consequential action. The gate is the supervision workflow in ## Supervision style in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md, reinforced by the Part 0 role check confirming a licensed supervising attorney owns the setup. Confirm the draft has been reviewed per the supervision protocol (queue / flag / lighter-touch) and all internal review labels ([AI-ASSISTED DRAFT], [VERIFY], etc.) have been removed from the client-facing copy.

Internal (for the professor)

Reader: The supervising professor. Knows the law. Wants to know where the case stands and what the student needs from them.

Include:

  • Procedural status (where in the life of the case)
  • What's been done since last check-in
  • What's coming up (deadlines, hearings)
  • Issues needing professor input
  • Student's assessment (how it's going, concerns)
# Status: [Client] — [Matter] — [date]

**Student:** [name] | **Procedural posture:** [pre-filing / answer filed /
discovery / motion pending / etc.]

## Since last check-in

- [What's been done]

## Upcoming

| Date | What | Action needed by |
|---|---|---|
| [date] | [deadline/hearing] | [date] |

## Needs professor input

- [Question or decision point — specific]

## Student's assessment

[How it's going. Strengths, concerns, strategic questions. This is where the
student's thinking shows.]

---
[AI-ASSISTED DRAFT — student should revise the assessment section especially;
that's your thinking, not a summary of notes]

Court-ready

Reader: A judge or clerk. Formal. Specific to what the court needs (often a status report ordered by the court, or a statement in advance of a status conference).

Include:

  • Procedural history (briefly)
  • Current status of discovery/motions/settlement
  • What's outstanding
  • Proposed next steps or scheduling

Format: Per local rules. Caption, signature block, certificate of service if filed.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  AI-ASSISTED DRAFT — requires student analysis and attorney review
  Court filings ALWAYS require professor review before filing
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

[Caption per jurisdiction — VERIFY against current local rules]

STATUS REPORT

[Party] respectfully submits this status report pursuant to [the court's
order of [date] / local rule [X] / in advance of the status conference
scheduled for [date]].

1. Procedural history: [brief]

2. Current status: [discovery status / motion status / settlement status]

3. Outstanding matters: [what's pending]

4. Proposed next steps: [scheduling, if the court wants input]

[Signature block — student attorney under supervision of [Professor]]

[Certificate of service if filing]

---

[VERIFY: caption format, local status report requirements, service
requirements — per current [Court] rules]

Supervision routing

Per ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md:

  • Client-facing → usually a flag trigger (client communication)
  • Internal → no flag (it's going to the professor anyway)
  • Court-ready → always flagged if formal queue enabled (court filings)

What this skill does NOT do

  • Decide what to tell the client. Especially on bad news or case weaknesses — that's a conversation for the student and professor to have, then the student to have with the client. Status updates are status, not strategic advice.
  • File anything with a court. Drafts the document; professor reviews; filing per clinic procedure.
  • Replace the student's assessment in internal status. The "student's assessment" section is the student's thinking — the draft can scaffold it but can't write it.

Close with the next-steps decision tree

End with the next-steps decision tree per CLAUDE.md ## Outputs. Customize the options to what this skill just produced — the five default branches (draft the X, escalate, get more facts, watch and wait, something else) are a starting point, not a lock-in. The tree is the output; the lawyer picks.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

ai-inventory

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Build an AI system register for EU AI Act reviews. Track owners, deployment status, EU connections, and each system’s role and risk category through a guided discussion, preserving classification reasons and dates for future review.

  • Register AI systems used or planned across an organization
  • Review each system’s role and risk category
  • Find systems approaching their next review date
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

ai-tool-handoff

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Coordinate bulk contract clause extraction with Luminance or Kira, prepare loading requests, and check returned results according to your team's review settings. Assess flagged clauses against the transaction and organize findings and required consents.

  • Preparing bulk clause extraction requests for contract batches
  • Sampling AI extraction results against original clauses
  • Checking whether change-of-control clauses apply to a deal
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

aia-generation

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Create an AI impact assessment in your team's format. Gather system details through conversation, analyze risks and applicable regulatory classifications, check consistency with internal policy, and document recommendations, safeguards, and conditions for deployment.

  • Assessing an AI system before deployment
  • Preparing an assessment after conditional triage
  • Reviewing pilot or production AI risks
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

amendment-history

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Trace changes across an original contract and its amendments. Get a chronological overview or follow one clause through successive revisions, with section references, current wording, and flags for conflicting or unclear language that needs legal review.

  • Summarize a contract’s amendment history
  • Find the current wording of a specific clause
  • Track changes to fees or liability limits
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

auto-updater

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Check installed community skills for updates, review file changes and expanded permissions, and flag outdated references. Updates require explicit approval, with backups available to restore the previous version if needed.

  • Check installed skills for available updates
  • Review permission changes before updating
  • Identify references overdue for verification
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

bar-prep-questions

Official · ClaudeFreeSummary

Practice for a U.S. bar exam with questions matched to the exam format, jurisdiction, and weak subjects. Get explanations for answer choices, essay feedback, and session records that reveal recurring mistakes and guide further practice.

  • Drilling weak subjects for a specific bar exam
  • Comparing general rules with state-specific rules
  • Getting feedback on practice essays
anthropics/claude-for-legal9.8KUpdated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by anthropics

Report a problem with this skill