Review code changes for security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Get findings tied to files and lines, severity ratings, practical suggestions with code examples, and a recommendation to approve, request changes, or discuss further.
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review code changes with a structured lens on security, performance, correctness, and maintainability.
/code-review <PR URL or file path>
Review the provided code changes: @$1
If no specific file or URL is provided, ask what to review.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CODE REVIEW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STANDALONE (always works) │
│ ✓ Paste a diff, PR URL, or point to files │
│ ✓ Security audit (OWASP top 10, injection, auth) │
│ ✓ Performance review (N+1, memory leaks, complexity) │
│ ✓ Correctness (edge cases, error handling, race conditions) │
│ ✓ Style (naming, structure, readability) │
│ ✓ Actionable suggestions with code examples │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + Source control: Pull PR diff automatically │
│ + Project tracker: Link findings to tickets │
│ + Knowledge base: Check against team coding standards │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## Code Review: [PR title or file]
### Summary
[1-2 sentence overview of the changes and overall quality]
### Critical Issues
| # | File | Line | Issue | Severity |
|---|------|------|-------|----------|
| 1 | [file] | [line] | [description] | 🔴 Critical |
### Suggestions
| # | File | Line | Suggestion | Category |
|---|------|------|------------|----------|
| 1 | [file] | [line] | [description] | Performance |
### What Looks Good
- [Positive observations]
### Verdict
[Approve / Request Changes / Needs Discussion]
If ~~source control is connected:
If ~~project tracker is connected:
If ~~knowledge base is connected:
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Review a design or web page against WCAG 2.1 AA, an accessibility standard. Organize findings on contrast, keyboard access, forms, and screen reader behavior, with severity levels and practical recommendations for fixes.
Build a single brief on an existing customer using available sales records, emails, documents, call notes, and internal chat. Understand the current situation, key contacts, recent discussions, and gaps that may need attention.
Build or refresh a strategic customer account plan from sales records, emails, and meeting transcripts. Organize goals, stakeholders, growth opportunities, risks, and dated actions into a document, then sync approved highlights to the customer relationship management system.
Research prospective companies and contacts, check existing customer records, and assess fit against your ideal customer profile. Receive a sourced brief covering recent developments, likely priorities, outreach talking points, and a suggested next step.
Research sales accounts using Common Room data to summarize company details, buying signals, ownership, and key contacts. Answer specific questions directly or prepare a broader briefing with evidence-based next steps, clearly identifying missing information.
Score and group accounts by customer fit and engagement, such as recent contact and open sales opportunities. Identify where to focus sales effort, choose next actions, and spot promising accounts with neglected outreach or missing information.