Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

risk-classification

Classifies agent tasks into 4 risk tiers (GREEN/YELLOW/RED/CRITICAL). Use when assessing action reversibility before committing to an approach.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (6)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • modules/automation-tiers.md3.3 KB
  • modules/heuristic-classifier.md4.1 KB
  • modules/readiness-levels.md8.1 KB
  • modules/tier-definitions.md3.1 KB
  • modules/verification-gates.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Risk Classification

Overview

Provides inline risk classification for agent tasks using a 4-tier model (GREEN/YELLOW/RED/CRITICAL). Uses fast heuristic file-pattern matching for low-risk tiers and delegates to Skill(attune:war-room-checkpoint) for high-risk tiers requiring full reversibility scoring.

When To Use

  • Assessing risk of tasks before agent assignment
  • Determining verification requirements for task completion
  • Deciding parallel execution safety between tasks
  • Adding risk markers to task checklists

When NOT To Use

  • Single-file trivial changes (assume GREEN)
  • Strategic architecture decisions (use full Skill(attune:war-room) instead)
  • Non-code tasks (documentation-only, configuration comments)

4-Tier Risk Model

TierColorScopeExampleVerification
GREENSafeSingle file, trivial revertTest files, docs, utilsNone required
YELLOWCautionModule-level, user-visibleComponents, routes, viewsConflict check and test pass
REDDangerCross-module, security/dataMigrations, auth, database schemaWar-room RS, full test, and review
CRITICALStopIrreversible, regulatedData deletion, production deployWar-room RS and human approval

Hybrid Routing

Task received
    |
    v
Heuristic classifier (file patterns)
    |
    ├── GREEN/YELLOW → Apply tier, continue
    |
    └── RED/CRITICAL → Invoke Skill(attune:war-room-checkpoint)
                        for reversibility scoring (RS)
                        |
                        └── RS confirms or adjusts tier

Why hybrid: GREEN/YELLOW classification is fast and deterministic (file pattern matching). RED/CRITICAL tasks warrant the overhead of full reversibility analysis because the cost of getting them wrong is high.

Task Metadata Extension

Add risk tier to task metadata for downstream consumption:

{
  "id": "5",
  "subject": "Add user authentication",
  "metadata": {
    "risk_tier": "YELLOW",
    "risk_reason": "Modifies src/components/LoginForm.tsx (user-visible component)",
    "classified_at": "2026-02-07T22:00:00Z"
  }
}

Tasks without risk_tier metadata default to GREEN (backward compatible).

Readiness Levels

The 4-tier Readiness Levels system provides clear risk classification with required controls per tier:

LevelNameWhenRequired Controls
0RoutineLow blast radius, easy rollbackBasic validation, rollback step
1WatchUser-visible changesReview, negative test, rollback note
2ElevatedSecurity/compliance/dataAdversarial review, risk checklist
3CriticalIrreversible, regulatedHuman confirmation, two-step verification

See modules/readiness-levels.md for full level definitions, selection decision tree, and integration guidance.

Graduated Autonomy

Risk classification sets how carefully a change is verified. Automation tiers set how autonomously the agent acts and when it must hand control back. Each risk tier carries a default automation tier (GREEN to A3 autonomous, CRITICAL to A0 manual), and a pre-licensed downgrade trigger drops the agent one tier on repeated failure, confidence loss, a stakes spike, or repo-state mismatch rather than re-prompting at the same level. See modules/automation-tiers.md for the tier table and the downgrade trigger, and imbue:assisted-mastery for the explain/produce mode selection that reads from it.

Module Reference

  • tier-definitions.md: Detailed tier criteria, boundaries, and override mechanism
  • heuristic-classifier.md: File-pattern rules for automated classification
  • verification-gates.md: Per-tier verification requirements and parallel safety matrix
  • readiness-levels.md: 4-tier risk system with required controls per level
  • automation-tiers.md: Per-tier autonomy defaults and the downgrade trigger

Integration Pattern

# In your skill's frontmatter
dependencies: [leyline:risk-classification]

For Task Generators

Append [R:TIER] marker to task format:

- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] [R:YELLOW] Create LoginForm component in src/components/LoginForm.tsx

For Orchestrators

Check risk tier before task assignment:

if task.risk_tier in ["RED", "CRITICAL"]:
    invoke Skill(attune:war-room-checkpoint) for RS scoring
    if CRITICAL: require human approval before proceeding

Exit Criteria

  • Every task has a risk tier assigned (explicit or default GREEN)
  • RED/CRITICAL tasks have war-room-checkpoint RS scores
  • Verification gates passed for the assigned tier
  • No parallel execution of prohibited tier combinations
  • Each task carries an automation tier; downgrades are recorded with a reason when a trigger fires

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Shapes turns action-first: action leads, steps numbered, state restated. Use for ADHD-friendly output. Do not use to trim tokens; use response-compression.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

Tracks per-agent token usage and flags waste in parallel dispatch. Use when evaluating parallel agent efficiency or after a multi-agent run.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

Coordinates Claude agent teams via filesystem protocol. Use when orchestrating parallel agents with task dependencies. Do not use for single-agent tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

Evaluates API surface design, consistency, and exemplar alignment. Use when reviewing public API changes or before releasing a new API surface.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

athola/claude-night-market343Updated Oct 24, 2026

See all skills by athola

Report a problem with this skill