Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

omcustom-improve-report

Read-only report of improvement suggestions from eval-core analysis engine

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Improve Report

Display improvement suggestions from eval-core analysis engine as read-only report. No file modifications, no GitHub mutations.

Purpose

Surface actionable improvement suggestions gathered by the eval-core analysis engine. Reads from eval-core's local database and renders insights as structured markdown. Useful for understanding routing quality, skill effectiveness, and agent usage patterns.

Usage

/omcustom:improve-report

Workflow

Step 1: Check eval-core availability

command -v eval-core 2>/dev/null || ls node_modules/.bin/eval-core 2>/dev/null

If not found → skip to Step 4 (fallback).

Step 2: Run analysis

eval-core analyze --format markdown

Step 3: Data sufficiency check

Count sessions recorded from the output metadata:

Sessions recordedConfidenceBehavior
< 5[confidence: low]Show results with message: "최소 5세션 이상의 데이터가 필요합니다. 현재 데이터로도 초기 분석은 가능하지만, 정확도는 제한적입니다."
5–20[confidence: medium]Show results with medium confidence note
> 20[confidence: high]Show results normally

Step 4: Display

If output contains data → display as structured markdown with confidence annotation prepended.

If command not found OR output is empty:

[omcustom:improve-report] 데이터 없음
eval-core가 설치되어 있지 않거나 아직 충분한 세션 데이터가 수집되지 않았습니다.
eval-core를 설치하거나 더 많은 세션을 진행한 후 다시 실행하세요.

Notes

  • Read-only: No file modifications, no GitHub issue creation, no external mutations
  • R010 compliant: Only executes Bash for read-only analysis — no write operations delegated
  • Graceful fallback: Falls back silently if eval-core or its DB doesn't exist
  • Confidence-aware: Reports data sufficiency alongside results per R011 conventions

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

See all skills by baekenough

Report a problem with this skill