Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

structured-dev-cycle

6-stage structured development cycle with stage-based tool restrictions

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md8.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Structured Development Cycle

A disciplined 6-stage development cycle that enforces quality through stage-based tool restrictions. Prevents premature implementation by requiring planning and verification phases.

Background

Inspired by Pi Coding Agent Workflow Extension's structured development approach. The core insight: restricting file modification tools during planning phases forces thorough analysis before code changes.

Stages

#StageAllowed ToolsBlocked ToolsPurpose
1PlanRead, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetchWrite, Edit, Bash (modifying)Define approach, analyze requirements
2Verify PlanRead, Glob, GrepWrite, Edit, BashReview plan from different perspective
3ImplementAll toolsNoneWrite code, create files
4Verify ImplementationRead, Glob, Grep, Bash (tests only)Write, EditReview code, run tests
5CompoundRead, Bash (tests only)Write, EditIntegration testing, cross-module validation
6DoneReadWrite, Edit, BashSummary and documentation

Stage Model Recommendations

Following the reasoning-sandwich pattern:

StageRecommended ModelRationale
1: PlanopusArchitectural reasoning, requirement analysis
2: Verify PlanopusEdge case detection, alternative evaluation
3: ImplementsonnetCode generation, file creation optimized
4: Verify ImplementationsonnetTest execution, structural review
5: CompoundsonnetIntegration testing, cross-module validation
6: DonehaikuChecklist validation, summary generation

Model selection is advisory — the orchestrator may override based on task complexity.

Stage Tracking

Stage state is tracked via a marker file for hook enforcement:

# Set stage (used by orchestrator or skill)
echo "plan" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage

# Valid stage values (all block Write/Edit except 'implement'):
# plan, verify-plan, implement, verify-impl, compound, done

# Clear stage (disable blocking)
rm -f /tmp/.claude-dev-stage

A PreToolUse hook in .claude/hooks/hooks.json checks this marker and blocks Write/Edit tools during non-implementation stages.

Workflow

Stage 1: Plan

[Stage 1/6: Plan]
├── Analyze requirements and constraints
├── Read existing code for context
├── Search for related patterns
├── Define approach with rationale
└── Output: Implementation plan document

Exit criteria: Clear plan with file list, approach description, and risk assessment.

Stage 2: Verify Plan

[Stage 2/6: Verify Plan]
├── Review plan for completeness
├── Check for missing edge cases
├── Validate against existing patterns
├── Consider alternative approaches
└── Output: Plan approval or revision requests

Exit criteria: Plan verified by different perspective (ideally different model via multi-model-verification).

Stage 3: Implement

[Stage 3/6: Implement]
├── Follow verified plan
├── Create/modify files as specified
├── Write tests alongside code
├── Track deviations from plan
└── Output: Implementation complete

Codex-Exec Hybrid Option: When entering Stage 3:

  1. Check /tmp/.claude-env-status-* for codex CLI availability
  2. If available AND task involves new file creation → automatically delegate scaffolding to /codex-exec:
    • Display: [Codex Hybrid] Delegating scaffolding to codex-exec...
    • codex-exec generates initial code (strength: fast generation)
    • Claude expert reviews and refines codex output (strength: reasoning, quality)
  3. If unavailable → display [Codex] Unavailable — proceeding with Claude experts directly and proceed with standard implementation via Claude experts

Suitable for codex hybrid: new files, boilerplate, test stubs, scaffolding Not suitable: modifying existing code, architecture-dependent changes

Exit criteria: All planned files created/modified, tests written.

Stage 4: Verify Implementation

[Stage 4/6: Verify Implementation]
├── Run test suite
├── Review code quality
├── Check for plan deviations
├── Validate error handling
└── Output: Verification report

Exit criteria: All tests pass, no critical issues found. If issues found, return to Stage 3.

Stage 5: Compound

[Stage 5/6: Compound]
├── Run integration tests
├── Cross-module validation
├── Check for side effects
├── Verify documentation accuracy
└── Output: Integration report

Exit criteria: No integration issues. If issues found, return to Stage 3.

Stage 6: Done

[Stage 6/6: Done]
├── Summarize changes made
├── List files modified
├── Note any deviations from plan
├── Suggest follow-up tasks
└── Output: Completion summary

Integration

With EnterPlanMode

Stage 1 (Plan) maps to Claude Code's EnterPlanMode. When the structured cycle is active:

  • EnterPlanMode triggers Stage 1
  • ExitPlanMode transitions to Stage 2 (Verify Plan), not directly to implementation

With Multi-Model Verification

Stage 2 (Verify Plan) and Stage 4 (Verify Implementation) can invoke the multi-model-verification skill for comprehensive review.

With PreToolUse Hooks

The stage marker file (/tmp/.claude-dev-stage) is read by a PreToolUse hook that enforces tool restrictions. This provides a safety net beyond instruction-based compliance.

With Agent Teams

For complex tasks, Agent Teams is preferred when available (R018):

  • Plan: architect agent
  • Verify: reviewer agent(s) — multi-model-verification via Agent Teams
  • Implement: domain expert agent (+ codex-exec hybrid if available)
  • Compound: QA agent

When Agent Teams is enabled AND task involves 3+ agents or review→fix cycles, using Agent Teams is MANDATORY per R018.

When to Use

Task ComplexityRecommended Cycle
Simple fix (< 3 files)Skip — direct implementation
Medium feature (3-10 files)Stages 1, 3, 4, 6 (skip verify plan, compound)
Complex feature (10+ files)Full 6-stage cycle
Architecture changeFull 6-stage cycle with multi-model verification
Security-critical codeFull 6-stage cycle (mandatory)

Stage Transition Commands

# Orchestrator manages transitions:
echo "plan" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage           # Enter planning
echo "verify-plan" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage     # Enter plan verification
echo "implement" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage       # Enter implementation
echo "verify-impl" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage     # Enter impl verification
echo "compound" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage        # Enter compound testing
echo "done" > /tmp/.claude-dev-stage            # Mark done
rm -f /tmp/.claude-dev-stage                    # Clear (disable blocking)

Limitations

  • Single session: The fixed path /tmp/.claude-dev-stage does not support concurrent Claude Code sessions. Running multiple sessions simultaneously may cause stage state conflicts.
  • World-writable path: The /tmp/ directory is accessible to all users. For multi-user environments, consider using a user-scoped path like /tmp/.claude-dev-stage-$(id -u).

Permission Mode

When spawning agents via the Agent tool during this skill's execution, always pass mode: "bypassPermissions". The Agent tool default (acceptEdits) overrides agent frontmatter permissionMode, causing permission prompts during unattended execution.

Display Format

═══ Structured Dev Cycle ═══════════════════════════
 [■■□□□□] Stage 2/6: Verify Plan
 Files planned: 5 | Risks identified: 2
═════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

baekenough/second-brain15Updated Oct 8, 2026

See all skills by baekenough

Report a problem with this skill