action-validator
FreePre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Worker-Reviewer iterative pipeline for quality-critical code with review cycles
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Defines an iterative Worker→Reviewer pipeline where one agent implements changes and another reviews them. The cycle repeats until quality criteria are met or max iterations reached.
Orchestrator-only — only the main conversation activates this pipeline (R010). Worker and Reviewer are subagents.
| Condition | Activate? |
|---|---|
| Quality-critical code changes (auth, security, payments) | Yes |
| Complex refactoring touching 5+ files | Yes |
| User explicitly requests review cycle | Yes |
| Simple file edits, config changes | No |
| Documentation-only changes | No |
pipeline:
name: feature-review
description: Implement and review a feature
worker:
agent: lang-typescript-expert # or appropriate specialist
model: sonnet
prompt: "Implement the feature based on requirements"
reviewer:
agent: lang-typescript-expert # can be same or different specialist
model: opus # often higher model for review
prompt: "Review implementation for correctness, security, performance"
config:
max_iterations: 3 # Max review cycles (default: 3)
quality_gate: all_pass # all_pass | majority_pass | custom
auto_commit: false # Auto-commit on quality pass (via mgr-gitnerd)
1. Orchestrator activates pipeline
2. Worker agent implements changes
3. Reviewer agent reviews Worker's output
4. Reviewer produces verdict:
- PASS → Pipeline complete, proceed to next step
- FAIL(issues) → Worker receives feedback, re-implements
5. Repeat 3-4 until PASS or max_iterations reached
6. If max_iterations reached without PASS:
- Report partial results to user
- Recommend manual review
Reviewer MUST output a structured verdict:
[Review Verdict]
├── Status: PASS | FAIL
├── Iteration: {n}/{max}
├── Issues Found: {count}
│ ├── [Critical] {description} — {file:line}
│ ├── [Major] {description} — {file:line}
│ └── [Minor] {description} — {file:line}
└── Summary: {one-line}
| Gate | Criteria |
|---|---|
all_pass | Zero Critical or Major issues (default) |
majority_pass | Zero Critical, ≤2 Minor issues allowed |
custom | User-defined in pipeline spec |
When Agent Teams is enabled, the pipeline SHOULD use Agent Teams:
TeamCreate("review-pipeline")
Worker (team member) ←→ Reviewer (team member)
SendMessage for feedback exchange
Shared TaskList for tracking issues
When Agent Teams is NOT available, falls back to sequential Agent tool calls:
Agent(worker) → result → Agent(reviewer) → verdict → Agent(worker) → ...
Before execution, display:
[Worker-Reviewer Pipeline]
├── Max iterations: {max_iterations} (default: 3, hard cap: 5)
├── Quality gate: {pass_threshold}% approval required
└── Early stop: All reviewers approve → stop immediately
[Pipeline] feature-review — Worker: lang-typescript-expert, Reviewer: lang-typescript-expert
[Iteration 1/3] Worker implementing...
[Iteration 1/3] Reviewer reviewing...
[Review] FAIL — 2 issues (1 Major, 1 Minor)
[Iteration 2/3] Worker fixing issues...
[Iteration 2/3] Reviewer re-reviewing...
[Review] PASS — 0 issues
[Pipeline Complete] 2 iterations, quality gate passed
worker: {agent: lang-typescript-expert, model: sonnet}
reviewer: {agent: lang-typescript-expert, model: opus}
config: {max_iterations: 3, quality_gate: all_pass}
worker: {agent: lang-golang-expert, model: sonnet}
reviewer: {agent: be-go-backend-expert, model: opus}
config: {max_iterations: 2, quality_gate: all_pass}
worker: {agent: lang-python-expert, model: sonnet}
reviewer: {agent: lang-python-expert, model: sonnet}
config: {max_iterations: 1, quality_gate: majority_pass}
| Rule | Integration |
|---|---|
| R009 | Worker and Reviewer can run in parallel with other pipelines |
| R010 | Pipeline orchestration runs only in main conversation |
| R015 | Display pipeline plan and review verdicts transparently |
| R018 | Agent Teams preferred when available for Worker↔Reviewer messaging |
| pipeline-guards | Max iterations and timeout enforced by pipeline-guards |
| model-escalation | Worker failures feed into escalation tracking |
| stuck-recovery | Repeated FAIL verdicts trigger stuck detection advisory |
When spawning agents via the Agent tool during this skill's execution, always pass mode: "bypassPermissions". The Agent tool default (acceptEdits) overrides agent frontmatter permissionMode, causing permission prompts during unattended execution.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.