Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

update-docs

Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code that may invalidate existing docs. Detects stale documentation by matching the code diff against in-repo doc files and applies targeted updates. Relevant when code changes rename, remove, or add APIs, fields, config keys, or CLI flags. Also applies when the user says "update docs", "check docs", or "are the docs stale", or when reviewing a branch for documentation accuracy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Update Docs

Code changes can silently invalidate documentation. A renamed function, a changed API signature, a removed configuration option, each can leave docs describing behavior that no longer exists. This skill detects that drift by matching the code diff against in-repo documentation and updating docs whose descriptions contradict the new code.

Process

Follow these steps in order. Do not skip steps.

1. Get the diff

DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref origin/HEAD | cut -d/ -f2)
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD "$DEFAULT_BRANCH")..HEAD --no-color

Record the list of files changed in the PR:

git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD "$DEFAULT_BRANCH")..HEAD

If the diff is empty, output NO_DOCS_UPDATED and stop.

2. Discover documentation files

Explore the repository structure to identify where documentation lives. Different repos organize docs differently — look for dedicated doc directories, standalone files like README.md at any level, and any other files whose primary purpose is documentation.

Search broadly — include diagram and config files that live alongside docs:

find . -type f \( -name "*.md" -o -name "*.rst" -o -name "*.adoc" \
  -o -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.mmd" -o -name "*.puml" \
  -o -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml" \) \
  ! -path "./.git/*" ! -path "./.forge/*" ! -path "./vendor/*" \
  ! -path "./node_modules/*" \
  | head -500

Then filter the results:

  • Exclude files already modified in the PR (they are being actively updated — check against the changed file list from step 1)
  • Exclude auto-generated files (lockfiles, generated API docs, swagger output)
  • Exclude changelog and release note entries that describe past releases
  • Exclude YAML/YML files that are not documentation. Only keep YAML files that live in doc directories or are clearly documentation examples.

If no documentation files exist in the repo, output NO_DOCS_FOUND and stop.

3. Build the identifier checklist

Go through every changed file in the PR. For each file, extract identifiers from the modified lines (lines starting with + or -) and from diff hunk headers (@@ lines). Write them down as a numbered checklist — one entry per changed file, with all identifiers from that file.

Use the most specific form of each identifier. CLI flag names, configuration keys, full function names, and type names are good — they match only relevant docs. Avoid generic short words that would match hundreds of unrelated files. If a generic term is the only identifier available for a change, include it, but prefer specific forms when they exist.

Do not skip files. Do not prioritize some files over others. Every changed file gets an entry in the checklist.

4. Search docs for every identifier

Write a shell script that takes the identifiers from step 3 and greps for each one across the documentation files from step 2. Run the script in a single Bash call:

for id in "identifier1" "identifier2" "identifier3"; do
  matches=$(grep -rlFi "$id" <doc_files> 2>/dev/null)
  if [ -n "$matches" ]; then
    echo "MATCH: $id -> $matches"
  fi
done

Include every identifier from every checklist entry in the for loop. The script handles the searching mechanically — no identifiers are skipped.

From the script output, collect all matched doc files into a candidate list.

5. Evaluate candidates (two passes)

Pass 1 — Quick scan. For each candidate, view only the lines that matched the grep (use grep -n to see them in context). Based on the matching lines alone, give a quick verdict:

- path/to/doc.md -> possibly stale (describes behavior that changed)
- path/to/other.md -> not stale (mentions identifier in passing)

Every candidate must have a verdict. Do not skip candidates.

Pass 2 — Deep read. Only for candidates marked "possibly stale" in pass 1. Read the full file alongside the relevant section of the diff. Confirm whether the doc is actually stale. Check the file header for auto-generation markers — if the file is generated from source, skip it.

When evaluating:

  • Only flag docs whose content is now incorrect. A doc that mentions an identifier is not stale if the described behavior is unchanged. It is stale only if the behavior, signature, or semantics changed in a way that makes the doc misleading.
  • Do not flag changelog entries or release notes that describe past releases. Historical entries are not stale because the code evolved.

6. Review beyond grep results

This step catches stale references that grep cannot find because documentation often uses prose names that differ from code identifiers, and new code introduces identifiers that don't exist in any doc yet.

Always read the repository's README. Also read any main index or overview files at the root of doc directories. Read each file fully and compare it against the diff. Determine whether it describes any behavior, flow, or feature that the code changes affected. If it does, add it to the list of confirmed stale docs.

Also scan the discovered documentation files for any that may cover the same area as the changed code, based on your understanding of what the diff does. You don't need to read every file — use file names and paths to decide which ones are worth checking.

7. Update confirmed stale docs

For each doc confirmed stale:

  1. Read the full file
  2. Update the documentation so it accurately reflects the new code
  3. Preserve the file's existing format, style, and structure

8. Present changes for review

Do not commit automatically. Instead, present the user with a summary of every file you updated and what changed in each one. Let the user review the changes and decide whether to commit.

9. Output

If docs were updated:

DOCS_UPDATED

Updated:
- [path/to/doc.md] Brief description of what was updated and why
- [path/to/other.rst] Brief description

If no docs needed updating:

NO_DOCS_UPDATED

If no doc files found:

NO_DOCS_FOUND

Constraints

  • Only change what the diff affects. Fix stale content and add new information that the diff introduced to existing docs. Do not improve, restructure, or reformat documentation that is unrelated to the code change.
  • Do not update historical entries. Changelog and release note entries for past releases are not stale — they describe what happened at that point in time.
  • Skip auto-generated files. Do not edit files that are generated from source. They should be regenerated, not manually patched.
  • Update existing files only. Do not create new doc files from scratch.
  • Preserve format. Match the existing file's formatting conventions (heading style, list style, code block syntax, etc.).

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

User asks for design, planning, or approach exploration before implementation. Covers new features, components, refactors, or architecture decisions. Creates design docs and proposes approaches with trade-offs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

Use when starting work in a repository under repositories/ that may lack CI configuration. Detects missing CI workflows (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI) and alerts the user to add one. Skips repos marked as research-only.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

Use when the user asks to measure command execution time or optimize a feedback loop. Records explicit measurements and recommends faster alternatives such as unit tests versus integration tests. It is opt-in; it does not run on every command.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

Team conventions for Python development — credentials, API clients, LLM response parsing, testing patterns, and data pipeline structure. Covers dotenv loading, retry logic, secret validation, and pipeline anti-patterns.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

Measurement-driven code refactoring — profile before changing, measure after, keep only if metrics improve. Covers complexity reduction, extraction patterns, and bulk refactoring for mechanical changes across many files.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

Scan projects for credential leaks, secrets in code, insecure patterns, LLM API key exposure, PII leakage to external AI services, and .env/.gitignore misconfigurations. Especially useful for data and API integrations, regardless of implementation language.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp18Updated Oct 1, 2026

See all skills by Benkapner

Report a problem with this skill