Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract, SES), k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Reference examples tested with: deepTools 3.5+, pyGenomeTracks 3.9+, Gviz 1.46+, EnrichedHeatmap 1.32+, ChIPseeker 1.38+, IGV 2.17+, samtools 1.19+, bedtools 2.31+.
"Visualize ChIP-seq signal around features of interest" -> Generate normalized signal tracks (bigWig), heatmaps centered on TSS/peaks, average profile plots, and genome-browser views — with normalization that supports the biological claim (within-sample vs cross-sample vs spike-in scaled).
bamCoverage -> computeMatrix -> plotHeatmap / plotProfileThe single most consequential choice is bigWig normalization — it determines whether visual comparison reflects biology. Get this right before generating any heatmap or browser view.
| Goal | Method | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| Within-sample profile of a single ChIP | --normalizeUsing CPM | Standard; reads per million; comparable within one library |
| Within-sample, length-aware | --normalizeUsing BPM | TPM-analog; useful for variable-width regions; less common for ChIP-seq |
| Cross-sample with equal effective depth | --normalizeUsing RPGC --effectiveGenomeSize <N> | "1x genome coverage" — assumes equal sequencing genome-wide; ENCODE convention |
| Cross-condition with global signal change | --scaleFactor <spike_in_derived> (skip --normalizeUsing) | HDACi / BETi / EZH2i; see chip-seq/spike-in-normalization |
| ChIP vs input ratio | bamCompare --operation log2 | Visualize enrichment over input |
| ChIP vs input control-subtracted | bamCompare --operation subtract | Absolute signal above background |
| ChIP vs input SES-corrected | bamCompare --operation SES | More robust to library size; uses signal-extraction-scaling |
ENCODE convention: RPGC with read-length-matched effective genome size. For visual comparison of treatment vs control on a fold-change biology, log2 bamCompare against shared input.
Spike-in scaled tracks (the right way):
# Compute scale factor from spike-in reads (ChIP-Rx Drosophila or CUT&RUN E. coli)
SCALE=$(echo "scale=6; 1.0 / $SPIKE_IN_READS_M" | bc) # 1 per million spike reads
bamCoverage -b chip.bam -o chip.bw --scaleFactor $SCALE --binSize 10
# DO NOT also pass --normalizeUsing; mutually exclusive
# Standard within-sample (CPM)
bamCoverage -b chip.bam -o chip.bw \
--normalizeUsing CPM --binSize 10 \
--extendReads 200 --numberOfProcessors 8
# Cross-sample at 1x genome coverage (ENCODE)
bamCoverage -b chip.bam -o chip.bw \
--normalizeUsing RPGC --effectiveGenomeSize 2701495761 \
--binSize 10 --extendReads 200
# ChIP vs Input log2 ratio (visualization of enrichment)
bamCompare -b1 chip.bam -b2 input.bam -o chip_vs_input.bw \
--operation log2 --binSize 50 --extendReads 200 \
--pseudocount 1 --skipZeroOverZero
# Compute matrix centered on TSS
computeMatrix reference-point \
--referencePoint TSS \
-b 3000 -a 3000 \
-R genes.bed \
-S chip.bw input.bw \
-o matrix.gz \
--outFileSortedRegions sorted_regions.bed \
--numberOfProcessors 8 \
--skipZeros
# Heatmap with k-means clustering (biology emerges from clusters)
plotHeatmap -m matrix.gz \
-o heatmap.pdf \
--kmeans 3 \
--colorMap RdBu_r \
--zMin -3 --zMax 3 \
--refPointLabel TSS \
--heatmapHeight 12 \
--whatToShow 'heatmap and colorbar'
# Profile plot (average signal across regions)
plotProfile -m matrix.gz \
-o profile.pdf \
--perGroup \
--plotTitle 'H3K4me3 around TSS'
computeMatrix scale-regions \
-R genes.bed \
-S chip.bw \
-b 3000 -a 3000 \
-m 5000 \
-o matrix_genebody.gz \
--numberOfProcessors 8
plotProfile -m matrix_genebody.gz -o genebody_profile.pdf --perGroup
multiBamSummary bins -b sample1.bam sample2.bam sample3.bam \
--binSize 10000 -o results.npz \
--numberOfProcessors 8
plotCorrelation -in results.npz \
--corMethod spearman \
--whatToPlot heatmap \
--plotNumbers -o correlation.pdf \
--outFileCorMatrix correlation.tab
# Replicates should correlate > 0.8 (narrow), > 0.6 (broad)
INI-driven, config-as-code; better than Gviz for complex layouts or pipeline integration.
# tracks.ini
[x-axis]
[chip-h3k27ac]
file = h3k27ac.bw
color = darkblue
height = 3
title = H3K27ac
[chip-h3k4me3]
file = h3k4me3.bw
color = darkred
height = 3
title = H3K4me3
[peaks-narrowpeak]
file = peaks.narrowPeak
file_type = narrow_peak
color = black
height = 0.5
title = MACS peaks
[se-bed]
file = super_enhancers.bed
color = orange
height = 0.5
title = Super-enhancers
[genes]
file = genes.gtf
color = darkgreen
prefered_name = gene_name
height = 4
pyGenomeTracks --tracks tracks.ini --region chr1:1000000-1500000 -o region.pdf
For pipeline-driven figure generation across multiple regions, pyGenomeTracks is easier to script than Gviz. For one-off publication figures with complex annotation, Gviz remains useful.
library(Gviz)
library(GenomicRanges)
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
chr <- 'chr1'; start <- 1e6; end <- 1.1e6
itrack <- IdeogramTrack(genome = 'hg38', chromosome = chr)
gtrack <- GenomeAxisTrack()
dtrack <- DataTrack(range = 'sample.bw', genome = 'hg38',
type = 'histogram', name = 'ChIP', col.histogram = 'darkblue')
grtrack <- GeneRegionTrack(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene,
genome = 'hg38', chromosome = chr, name = 'Genes')
plotTracks(list(itrack, gtrack, dtrack, grtrack), from = start, to = end, chromosome = chr)
library(EnrichedHeatmap)
library(rtracklayer)
# Normalize bigWig signal to a matrix around target sites
signal <- import('sample.bw')
tss <- promoters(txdb, upstream = 0, downstream = 1)
mat <- normalizeToMatrix(signal, tss, extend = 3000, mean_mode = 'w0', w = 50)
# Heatmap with customization
EnrichedHeatmap(mat, name = 'Signal', col = c('white', 'red'),
top_annotation = HeatmapAnnotation(lines = anno_enriched()))
library(ChIPseeker)
library(TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene)
peaks <- readPeakFile('peaks.narrowPeak')
promoter <- getPromoters(TxDb = TxDb.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38.knownGene,
upstream = 3000, downstream = 3000)
tagMatrix <- getTagMatrix(peaks, windows = promoter)
# Tag heatmap and average profile
tagHeatmap(tagMatrix, xlim = c(-3000, 3000), color = 'red')
plotAvgProf(tagMatrix, xlim = c(-3000, 3000), conf = 0.95,
xlab = 'Distance from TSS (bp)', ylab = 'Peak density')
# IGV batch script for reproducible screenshots
cat > igv.batch << 'EOF'
new
genome hg38
load chip.bw
load peaks.bed
load super_enhancers.bed
goto chr1:1000000-1100000
snapshot region1.png
goto chr2:50000000-51000000
snapshot region2.png
exit
EOF
igv.sh -b igv.batch
--normalizeUsing and --scaleFactor conflictTrigger: Passing both --normalizeUsing CPM and --scaleFactor X.
Mechanism: deepTools applies scaleFactor first, then normalizes; the normalization undoes the scale.
Symptom: Spike-in scaling appears to have no effect; tracks look like CPM.
Fix: Use ONE — --scaleFactor alone for spike-in; --normalizeUsing alone otherwise. Never both.
Trigger: bamCompare --operation log2 without pseudocount; many bins have zero reads.
Mechanism: log2(0/x) = -Inf; downstream tools (plotHeatmap) may color these as NaN or fail.
Fix: Add --pseudocount 1 to both samples; or use --skipZeroOverZero to skip bins with zero in both samples.
Trigger: Using stranded bigWigs (separate plus/minus) with reference-point mode on a BED without strand info.
Mechanism: computeMatrix doesn't auto-detect strand; signal is plotted in genomic-strand orientation, breaking TSS-centered plots.
Fix: Use unstranded merged bigWig OR ensure BED has strand column 6.
--kmeans -- Order depends on first sample onlyTrigger: Using k-means with multiple samples and expecting consistent clustering.
Mechanism: k-means clusters by signal in the first -S bigWig only; other samples are plotted in the same row order.
Fix: Order samples in -S so the most-discriminating one is first; for combined clustering across samples, use --hclust or run k-means externally on combined matrix.
Trigger: Computing scale_factor = spike_reads / 1e6 and passing to --scaleFactor.
Mechanism: deepTools multiplies signal by scaleFactor; the INVERSE is correct (sample with fewer spike reads gets larger scale factor to compensate).
Symptom: Treatment samples appear lower than control even when biology says higher.
Fix: scale_factor = MIN(spike_reads_all_samples) / spike_reads_this_sample. Always verify against known internal-control regions (blacklist should show no signal change post-scaling).
Trigger: Loading a 3 GB bigWig into R as a GRanges.
Mechanism: Gviz loads the entire bigWig into memory for genome-wide views.
Fix: Use chromosome parameter to restrict; use import.bw(con, which = GRanges(...)) to subset; consider pyGenomeTracks for whole-chromosome views.
Trigger: Custom INI keys not recognized; or section names with spaces.
Mechanism: pyGenomeTracks expects exact key names; case-sensitive section labels.
Fix: Run make_tracks_file --trackFiles sample.bw -o tracks.ini to generate a template; modify from there.
| Pattern | Likely cause | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Heatmap shows enrichment; profile plot doesn't | Signal concentrated at few regions; profile averages them out | Both correct; heatmap shows distribution, profile shows central tendency |
| Replicate heatmaps differ at peak edges | Different normalization or stranded vs unstranded bigWigs | Verify bigWig parameters identical; use same --normalizeUsing |
| Spike-in scaled tracks show opposite trend from CPM | Global shift; CPM forces median to control levels | Spike-in is correct; CPM is fooled by composition |
| ChIPseeker tag heatmap differs from deepTools heatmap | ChIPseeker uses peak density; deepTools uses signal coverage | Different metrics; pick one per analysis |
| Profile plot loose-replicate band wide | Genuine biological variability OR one replicate failed | Check per-replicate metrics (chipseq-qc); don't average across failing rep |
| Error / symptom | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| bigWig has all zeros | Wrong chromosome naming (chr vs no chr) | `samtools view -H bam |
| computeMatrix "all regions skipped" | BED chromosome naming mismatches bigWig | Match seqlevels |
| plotHeatmap colors compressed | --zMin/--zMax not set; outliers dominate | Set --zMin -3 --zMax 3 or use percentile-based |
| IGV batch hangs | exit command missing; IGV waits for input | Always end batch script with exit |
| pyGenomeTracks region out of range | Region exceeds chromosome length | Verify region from samtools view -H bam |
| Spike-in scaled track has artifact stripes | Scale factor too extreme (>10x) | Verify spike-in reads adequate (>100k); check titration |
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Workflow for read alignment, sorting, indexing, mapping statistics, and downstream-ready alignment artifacts.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
AlphaFold2 / AlphaFold-Multimer structure prediction for validation and confidence scoring. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm2-sequence-scoring. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Workflow for event-level and isoform-level splicing analysis with sashimi-ready outputs and splice QC.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
ATAC-seq processing with assay QC, MACS3 peak calling, consensus peak matrices, differential accessibility, and motif or footprint follow-up.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.