Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

analytics-product

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md8.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

ANALYTICS-PRODUCT — Decida com Dados

Overview

Analytics de produto — PostHog, Mixpanel, eventos, funnels, cohorts, retencao, north star metric, OKRs e dashboards de produto. Ativar para: configurar tracking de eventos, criar funil de conversao, analise de cohort, retencao, DAU/MAU, feature flags, A/B testing, north star metric, OKRs, dashboard de produto.

When to Use This Skill

  • When you need specialized assistance with this domain

Do Not Use This Skill When

  • The task is unrelated to analytics product
  • A simpler, more specific tool can handle the request
  • The user needs general-purpose assistance without domain expertise

How It Works

[objeto]_[verbo_passado]

Correto:   user_signed_up, conversation_started, upgrade_completed
Errado:    signup, click, conversion

Analytics-Product — Decida Com Dados

"In God we trust. All others must bring data." — W. Edwards Deming


Eventos Essenciais Da Auri

AURI_EVENTS = {
    # Aquisicao
    "user_signed_up":        {"props": ["source", "medium", "campaign"]},
    "onboarding_started":    {"props": ["step_count"]},
    "onboarding_completed":  {"props": ["time_to_complete", "steps_skipped"]},

    # Ativacao
    "first_conversation":    {"props": ["intent", "response_time"]},
    "aha_moment_reached":    {"props": ["trigger", "session_number"]},
    "feature_discovered":    {"props": ["feature_name", "discovery_method"]},

    # Retencao
    "conversation_started":  {"props": ["intent", "user_tier", "device"]},
    "conversation_completed":{"props": ["messages_count", "duration", "rating"]},
    "session_started":       {"props": ["days_since_last", "platform"]},

    # Receita
    "upgrade_viewed":        {"props": ["trigger", "current_tier"]},
    "upgrade_started":       {"props": ["target_tier", "trigger"]},
    "upgrade_completed":     {"props": ["tier", "plan", "revenue"]},
    "subscription_canceled": {"props": ["reason", "tier", "tenure_days"]},
    "payment_failed":        {"props": ["attempt_count", "error_code"]},
}

Implementacao Posthog (Python)

from posthog import Posthog
import os

posthog = Posthog(
    project_api_key=os.environ["POSTHOG_API_KEY"],
    host=os.environ.get("POSTHOG_HOST", "https://app.posthog.com")
)

def track(user_id: str, event: str, properties: dict = None):
    posthog.capture(
        distinct_id=user_id,
        event=event,
        properties=properties or {}
    )

def identify(user_id: str, traits: dict):
    posthog.identify(
        distinct_id=user_id,
        properties=traits
    )

## Uso:

track("user_123", "conversation_started", {
    "intent": "business_advice",
    "device": "alexa",
    "user_tier": "pro"
})

Funil De Ativacao Auri

Visita landing page          (100%)
    | [meta: 40%]
Clicou "Experimentar"         (40%)
    | [meta: 70%]
Completou cadastro            (28%)
    | [meta: 60%]
Fez primeira conversa         (17%)  <- AHA MOMENT
    | [meta: 50%]
Voltou no dia seguinte        (8.5%)
    | [meta: 40%]
Usou 3+ dias na semana        (3.4%)
    | [meta: 20%]
Converteu para Pro            (0.7%)

Otimizando O Funil

Para cada drop-off > benchmark:
1. Identificar: onde exatamente o usuario sai?
2. Entender: por que? (session recordings, surveys)
3. Hipotese: qual mudanca poderia melhorar?
4. Testar: A/B test com amostra estatisticamente significante
5. Medir: 2 semanas minimo, p-value < 0.05
6. Aprender: mesmo se falhar, entende-se o usuario melhor

Analise De Cohort (Retencao Semanal)

def calculate_cohort_retention(events_df):
    """
    events_df: DataFrame com colunas [user_id, event_date, event_name]
    Retorna: matriz de retencao [cohort_week x week_number]
    """
    import pandas as pd

    first_session = events_df[events_df.event_name == "session_started"] \
        .groupby("user_id")["event_date"].min() \
        .dt.to_period("W")

    sessions = events_df[events_df.event_name == "session_started"].copy()
    sessions["cohort"] = sessions["user_id"].map(first_session)
    sessions["weeks_since"] = (
        sessions["event_date"].dt.to_period("W") - sessions["cohort"]
    ).apply(lambda x: x.n)

    cohort_data = sessions.groupby(["cohort", "weeks_since"])["user_id"].nunique()
    cohort_sizes = cohort_data.unstack().iloc[:, 0]
    retention = cohort_data.unstack().divide(cohort_sizes, axis=0) * 100

    return retention

Benchmarks De Retencao (Assistentes De Voz)

SemanaPessimoOkBomExcelente
W1<20%20-35%35-50%>50%
W4<10%10-20%20-30%>30%
W8<5%5-12%12-20%>20%

Definindo A North Star Da Auri

Framework:
1. O que cria valor real para o usuario? -> Conversas que geram insight/acao
2. O que prediz crescimento de longo prazo? -> Usuarios com 3+ conv/semana
3. Como medir? -> "Weekly Active Conversationalists" (WAC)

North Star: WAC (Weekly Active Conversationalists)
Definicao: Usuarios com >= 3 conversas na semana que duraram >= 2 minutos

Meta Ano 1: 10.000 WAC
Meta Ano 2: 100.000 WAC

Dashboard North Star

def calculate_north_star(db):
    wac = db.query("""
        SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) as wac
        FROM conversations
        WHERE
            created_at >= NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days'
            AND duration_seconds >= 120
        GROUP BY user_id
        HAVING COUNT(*) >= 3
    """).scalar()

    return {
        "wac": wac,
        "wow_growth": calculate_wow_growth(db, "wac"),
        "target": 10000,
        "progress": f"{wac/10000*100:.1f}%"
    }

Feature Flags Com Posthog

def is_feature_enabled(user_id: str, feature: str) -> bool:
    return posthog.feature_enabled(feature, user_id)

if is_feature_enabled(user_id, "new-onboarding-v2"):
    show_new_onboarding()
else:
    show_old_onboarding()

Calculadora De Significancia Estatistica

from scipy import stats
import numpy as np

def ab_test_significance(
    control_conversions: int,
    control_visitors: int,
    variant_conversions: int,
    variant_visitors: int,
    confidence: float = 0.95
) -> dict:
    control_rate = control_conversions / control_visitors
    variant_rate = variant_conversions / variant_visitors
    lift = (variant_rate - control_rate) / control_rate * 100

    _, p_value = stats.chi2_contingency([
        [control_conversions, control_visitors - control_conversions],
        [variant_conversions, variant_visitors - variant_conversions]
    ])[:2]

    significant = p_value < (1 - confidence)

    return {
        "control_rate": f"{control_rate*100:.2f}%",
        "variant_rate": f"{variant_rate*100:.2f}%",
        "lift": f"{lift:+.1f}%",
        "p_value": round(p_value, 4),
        "significant": significant,
        "recommendation": "Deploy variant" if significant and lift > 0 else "Keep control"
    }

6. Comandos

ComandoAcao
/event-taxonomyDefine taxonomia de eventos
/funnel-analysisAnalisa funil de conversao
/cohort-retentionCalcula retencao por cohort
/north-starDefine ou revisa North Star Metric
/ab-testCalcula significancia de A/B test
/dashboard-setupCria dashboard de produto
/okr-templateTemplate de OKRs para produto

Best Practices

  • Provide clear, specific context about your project and requirements
  • Review all suggestions before applying them to production code
  • Combine with other complementary skills for comprehensive analysis

Common Pitfalls

  • Using this skill for tasks outside its domain expertise
  • Applying recommendations without understanding your specific context
  • Not providing enough project context for accurate analysis

Related Skills

  • growth-engine - Complementary skill for enhanced analysis
  • monetization - Complementary skill for enhanced analysis
  • product-design - Complementary skill for enhanced analysis
  • product-inventor - Complementary skill for enhanced analysis

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

See all skills by bouclem

Report a problem with this skill