Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

architecture

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (6)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • context-discovery.md1.6 KB
  • examples.md2.4 KB
  • pattern-selection.md2.6 KB
  • patterns-reference.md2.3 KB
  • trade-off-analysis.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Architecture Decision Framework

"Requirements drive architecture. Trade-offs inform decisions. ADRs capture rationale."

🎯 Selective Reading Rule

Read ONLY files relevant to the request! Check the content map, find what you need.

FileDescriptionWhen to Read
context-discovery.mdQuestions to ask, project classificationStarting architecture design
trade-off-analysis.mdADR templates, trade-off frameworkDocumenting decisions
pattern-selection.mdDecision trees, anti-patternsChoosing patterns
examples.mdMVP, SaaS, Enterprise examplesReference implementations
patterns-reference.mdQuick lookup for patternsPattern comparison

🔗 Related Skills

SkillUse For
@[skills/database-design]Database schema design
@[skills/api-patterns]API design patterns
@[skills/deployment-procedures]Deployment architecture

Core Principle

"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."

  • Start simple
  • Add complexity ONLY when proven necessary
  • You can always add patterns later
  • Removing complexity is MUCH harder than adding it

Validation Checklist

Before finalizing architecture:

  • Requirements clearly understood
  • Constraints identified
  • Each decision has trade-off analysis
  • Simpler alternatives considered
  • ADRs written for significant decisions
  • Team expertise matches chosen patterns

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

See all skills by bouclem

Report a problem with this skill