Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

clean-code

This skill embodies the principles of "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob). Use it to transform "code that works" into "code that is clean."

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Clean Code Skill

This skill embodies the principles of "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob). Use it to transform "code that works" into "code that is clean."

🧠 Core Philosophy

"Code is clean if it can be read, and enhanced by a developer other than its original author." — Grady Booch

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Writing new code: To ensure high quality from the start.
  • Reviewing Pull Requests: To provide constructive, principle-based feedback.
  • Refactoring legacy code: To identify and remove code smells.
  • Improving team standards: To align on industry-standard best practices.

1. Meaningful Names

  • Use Intention-Revealing Names: elapsedTimeInDays instead of d.
  • Avoid Disinformation: Don't use accountList if it's actually a Map.
  • Make Meaningful Distinctions: Avoid ProductData vs ProductInfo.
  • Use Pronounceable/Searchable Names: Avoid genymdhms.
  • Class Names: Use nouns (Customer, WikiPage). Avoid Manager, Data.
  • Method Names: Use verbs (postPayment, deletePage).

2. Functions

  • Small!: Functions should be shorter than you think.
  • Do One Thing: A function should do only one thing, and do it well.
  • One Level of Abstraction: Don't mix high-level business logic with low-level details (like regex).
  • Descriptive Names: isPasswordValid is better than check.
  • Arguments: 0 is ideal, 1-2 is okay, 3+ requires a very strong justification.
  • No Side Effects: Functions shouldn't secretly change global state.

3. Comments

  • Don't Comment Bad Code—Rewrite It: Most comments are a sign of failure to express ourselves in code.
  • Explain Yourself in Code:
    # Check if employee is eligible for full benefits
    if employee.flags & HOURLY and employee.age > 65:
    
    vs
    if employee.isEligibleForFullBenefits():
    
  • Good Comments: Legal, Informative (regex intent), Clarification (external libraries), TODOs.
  • Bad Comments: Mumbling, Redundant, Misleading, Mandated, Noise, Position Markers.

4. Formatting

  • The Newspaper Metaphor: High-level concepts at the top, details at the bottom.
  • Vertical Density: Related lines should be close to each other.
  • Distance: Variables should be declared near their usage.
  • Indentation: Essential for structural readability.

5. Objects and Data Structures

  • Data Abstraction: Hide the implementation behind interfaces.
  • The Law of Demeter: A module should not know about the innards of the objects it manipulates. Avoid a.getB().getC().doSomething().
  • Data Transfer Objects (DTO): Classes with public variables and no functions.

6. Error Handling

  • Use Exceptions instead of Return Codes: Keeps logic clean.
  • Write Try-Catch-Finally First: Defines the scope of the operation.
  • Don't Return Null: It forces the caller to check for null every time.
  • Don't Pass Null: Leads to NullPointerException.

7. Unit Tests

  • The Three Laws of TDD:
    1. Don't write production code until you have a failing unit test.
    2. Don't write more of a unit test than is sufficient to fail.
    3. Don't write more production code than is sufficient to pass the failing test.
  • F.I.R.S.T. Principles: Fast, Independent, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.

8. Classes

  • Small!: Classes should have a single responsibility (SRP).
  • The Stepdown Rule: We want the code to read like a top-down narrative.

9. Smells and Heuristics

  • Rigidity: Hard to change.
  • Fragility: Breaks in many places.
  • Immobility: Hard to reuse.
  • Viscosity: Hard to do the right thing.
  • Needless Complexity/Repetition.

🛠️ Implementation Checklist

  • Is this function smaller than 20 lines?
  • Does this function do exactly one thing?
  • Are all names searchable and intention-revealing?
  • Have I avoided comments by making the code clearer?
  • Am I passing too many arguments?
  • Is there a failing test for this change?

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

Create, iterate, and scale paid ad creative for Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, and similar platforms. Use when generating headlines, descriptions, primary text, or large sets of ad variations for testing and performance optimization.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

bouclem/skills7Updated May 31, 2026

See all skills by bouclem

Report a problem with this skill