Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

data-analysis

Write and review R analysis scripts for a sewage research project using its established conventions. Estimate requested regression models, add specifications, and save LaTeX tables, figures, and model objects for use in the research paper.

OriginalShow the original description

End-to-end R data analysis for the sewage project. Writes analysis scripts following project conventions (here::here, arrow/parquet, fixest, modelsummary, native pipe), runs code review, and produces publication-ready tables and figures. This skill should be used when asked to "run an analysis", "estimate the model", "add a specification", or "write an R script".

See how to install

Good for

  • Estimate models of sewage spills and property prices
  • Add specifications to an existing regression analysis
  • Create descriptive plots and maps
  • Save paper tables, figures, and regression objects

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Data Analysis

Run an end-to-end data analysis following sewage project conventions.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — a dataset path, analysis goal description, or specification to estimate.


Project-Specific Context

Analysis Organisation

Scripts in scripts/R/09_analysis/ by approach:

  • 01_descriptive/ — Maps, scatter plots, Google Trends
  • 02_hedonic/ — Cross-sectional hedonic regressions
  • 03_repeat_sales/ — Repeat-transaction regressions
  • 04_long_difference/ — 250m grid-level long differences
  • 05_news/ — DiD and event studies with media coverage
  • 06_upstream_downstream/ — Directional spillover
  • 07_dry_spills/ — Dry spill analysis

Datasets

  • data/final/ — Analysis-ready datasets
  • data/processed/ — Intermediate pipeline outputs (parquet)
  • All data loaded via arrow::read_parquet() or arrow::open_dataset()

Output Destinations

  • Tables: output/tables/*.tex (modelsummary → LaTeX with tabularray)
  • Figures: output/figures/*.pdf or *.png
  • Regression objects: output/regs/*.rds
  • HTML interactive: output/html_plots/

Required R Conventions

  • here::here() for all paths
  • Native pipe |>
  • fixest::feols() for regressions with vcov = "hetero"
  • modelsummary for table output (tabularray format, [H] placement)
  • arrow for parquet I/O
  • snake_case naming
  • forcats::as_factor() for factors

Workflow

Step 1: Context Gathering

  1. Understand the analysis goal from $ARGUMENTS
  2. Read existing analysis scripts in the relevant subdirectory for patterns
  3. Read scripts/R/utils/spill_aggregation_utils.R if spill metrics are involved
  4. Check data/final/ for available datasets
  5. Read the relevant manuscript section in docs/overleaf/ if the analysis feeds into the paper

Step 2: Write Analysis Script

Follow the analysis script structure:

# ================================================================
# [Descriptive Title]
# Purpose: [What this script does]
# Inputs: [Data files]
# Outputs: [Figures, tables, RDS files]
# ================================================================

# === 1. Setup ============================================

library(tidyverse)
library(fixest)
library(modelsummary)
library(arrow)
library(here)

# === 2. Data Loading =====================================

df <- read_parquet(here("data", "final", "dataset.parquet"))

# === 3. Main Analysis ====================================

model <- feols(
  log_price ~ spill_count | lsoa + year_quarter,
  data = df,
  vcov = "hetero"
)

# === 4. Tables and Figures ================================

modelsummary(
  list("Main" = model),
  output = here("output", "tables", "table_name.tex"),
  fmt = 3
)

# === 5. Export ============================================

saveRDS(model, here("output", "regs", "model_name.rds"))

Step 3: Code Review

After writing the script, review it against the 9 categories from /review-r:

  • Script structure, console hygiene, reproducibility
  • Function design, figure quality, data persistence
  • Comments, error handling, polish

Fix any Critical or Major issues before presenting.

Step 4: Run the Script

If the user wants execution:

cd /Users/jacopoolivieri/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/01_projects/sewage
Rscript scripts/R/09_analysis/[subdir]/[script_name].R

Step 5: Present Results

  1. Results summary — Key estimates with SEs and economic interpretation
  2. Script created — Path and description
  3. Output files — Tables and figures generated
  4. Code review notes — Any conventions to flag
  5. TODO items — Missing data, additional specifications needed

Principles

  • Reproduce, don't guess. If a specific regression is requested, implement exactly that.
  • Strategy alignment. If an analysis feeds into a manuscript section, the code must implement what the paper claims.
  • Publication-ready output. Tables and figures should be directly includable in the paper.
  • Follow existing patterns. Read neighbouring scripts in the same subdirectory for style consistency.
  • Save everything. Every regression object saved as RDS, every table as LaTeX, every figure as PDF.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill