Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

do-agent

Coordinate complex tasks across multiple agents through planning, execution, review, and revision. Agents save their work to local files and return status summaries, helping the main agent manage limited context while delivering the final result.

OriginalShow the original description

This skill should be used when the user asks to "/do-agent", asks for "Execute complex tasks using multi-agent architecture with context protection", or needs the workflow previously provided by the /do-agent slash command.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Breaking a complex task into coordinated agent assignments
  • Running independent subtasks in parallel
  • Reviewing results and revising them from feedback
  • Keeping detailed agent outputs in local files

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Explore and ultrathink to design a systematic multi-agent, multi-stage (up to 10 subagents in parallel in each stage) execution plan to accomplish: $ARGUMENTS

执行模式:explore → ultrathink → plan → track → execute → review → revise → deliver final output

Note:

  • Get the current Date and Time (Beijing time)
  • 创建临时工作目录 agent_tasks/{short task description}_yyyyddmmhh/ 作为临时工作空间(if a folder with this name already exists, make a new one to avoid overwriting existing materals)
  • When assigning tasks to subagents, specify their input and output files explicitly
  • 每个子代理必须自己将处理结果立即保存到本地文件,不要返回给主代理!子代理自己马上保存,不要返回给主代理!
  • 严禁将子代理完整输出返回主代理;只返回状态摘要
  • 第一个本地输出文件:multi-agent execution plan 文档 agent_tasks/{short task description}_yyyyddmmhh/plan.md
  • The main/mother agent must allow all Read + Write + Bash tools for all sub-agents
  • Apply context engineering — main agent context is scarce
  • The execution plan must include (at minimum) these four phases, each with multiple agents (in parallel when possible):
    1. 规划阶段:信息收集与方案规划
    2. 实施阶段:执行与整合任务结果
    3. 对任务结果进行审阅与反馈
    4. 根据审阅反馈,对任务结果进行全面修订
  • Do not ask for plan approval, just set up the tasks tracking and do it once the planning phase finished
  • Complete automation of the entire process, from planning to execution to review and revision, without any human intervention

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill