Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

lifelines

Analyze time until events such as recovery or relapse using Python. Account for censored observations, where the event has not been observed, create survival curves, compare groups, and estimate risk factors with Cox regression.

OriginalShow the original description

Complete survival analysis library in Python. Handles right-censored data, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox regression. Standard for clinical trial analysis and epidemiology.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Analyzing time to death or disease progression in clinical trials
  • Comparing survival curves across treatment groups
  • Estimating risk factors with Cox regression
  • Studying time to infection or recovery

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Lifelines - Survival Analysis

In medicine, we often care about "Time to Event" (death, recovery, relapse). Lifelines handles the complexity of "censored" data (patients who left the study).

When to Use

  • Analyzing clinical trial data (time to death, disease progression).
  • Comparing survival between treatment groups.
  • Identifying risk factors using Cox Proportional Hazards regression.
  • Building survival models for prognosis.
  • Epidemiology studies (time to infection, recovery).

Core Principles

Censoring

Patients who haven't experienced the event by the end of the study are "censored". Lifelines properly accounts for this.

Hazard Ratios

In Cox regression, a hazard ratio > 1 means increased risk; < 1 means decreased risk.

Survival Curves

Kaplan-Meier estimates the probability of survival over time without assuming a distribution.

Quick Reference

Standard Imports

from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter, CoxPHFitter
from lifelines.statistics import logrank_test
import pandas as pd

Basic Patterns

# 1. Kaplan-Meier (Visualizing survival)
kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
kmf.fit(durations=df['days'], event_observed=df['died'])
kmf.plot_survival_function()
kmf.median_survival_time_  # Time when 50% have died

# 2. Cox Proportional Hazards (Risk factors)
cph = CoxPHFitter()
cph.fit(df, duration_col='days', event_col='died')
cph.print_summary() # See hazard ratios for age, drug type, etc.
cph.plot_partial_effects_on_outcome(covariates=['age'], values=[30, 50, 70])

Critical Rules

✅ DO

  • Use event_observed correctly - 1 = event occurred, 0 = censored.
  • Check proportional hazards assumption - Use cph.check_assumptions() to validate Cox model.
  • Compare groups with logrank test - Statistical test for survival curve differences.
  • Plot confidence intervals - Survival estimates have uncertainty, especially with small samples.

❌ DON'T

  • Don't ignore censoring - Treating censored patients as "survived" biases results.
  • Don't use regular regression - Time-to-event data requires specialized methods.
  • Don't assume proportional hazards - If violated, use stratified Cox or parametric models.

Advanced Patterns

Comparing Multiple Groups

from lifelines.statistics import multivariate_logrank_test

# Compare survival across treatment groups
results = multivariate_logrank_test(df['days'], df['group'], df['died'])
print(results.p_value)

Parametric Models

from lifelines import WeibullFitter, ExponentialFitter

# When you need to extrapolate beyond observed data
wf = WeibullFitter()
wf.fit(df['days'], df['died'])
wf.plot()

Lifelines transforms complex survival data into actionable medical insights, enabling evidence-based decisions in clinical research and practice.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill