Organize experiment goals, settings, metrics, and progress in existing Obsidian notes. Keep temporary logs in daily notes, promote stable findings into result notes, and connect evidence with interpretation and decisions about the next step.
Use this skill when the user discusses experiment design, ablations, training runs, evaluation, baselines, metrics, failures, or result interpretation that should be logged into Obsidian experiment and result notes.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Use this skill whenever project work changes the experimental state.
This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.
It should help maintain canonical experiment and result notes, not create note sprawl.
Experiments/Results/, if a durable finding existsDaily/ noteDaily/ until they are interpreted.planned, running, done, failed)Link experiments and results directly to each other, and link both back to 00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, or Daily/ only when those references improve the main working surface.
Treat experiment notes as the bridge between Papers/ and Results/:
Results/,Writing/ rather than leaving the chain unfinished.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.