Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

obsidian-link-graph

Repair navigation between existing Obsidian project notes by improving meaningful links among papers, experiments, results, and writing. Keep references connected to the main note for each subject while avoiding unnecessary extra notes and excessive linking.

OriginalShow the original description

Use this skill when the user wants to repair or strengthen Obsidian wikilinks among existing canonical project notes, especially across papers, knowledge notes, experiments, results, and writing.

Works withObsidian

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Repairing links between existing project notes
  • Connecting paper notes with experiments and results
  • Finding the best existing note for a new reference
  • Reducing isolated notes without adding unnecessary pages

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Obsidian Link Graph

This is a legacy compatibility helper.

Despite the name, the current default workflow is not graph-heavy. Use this skill to repair navigation among existing canonical notes, not to generate graph artifacts by default.

Responsibilities

  • strengthen wikilinks among 00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, Knowledge/, Papers/, Experiments/, Results/, Writing/, and Daily/
  • improve backlinks where a durable relationship is already clear
  • help route a new reference to the best existing canonical note
  • reduce disconnected durable notes without creating concept or dataset sprawl

Link heuristics

  • Prefer one canonical note per durable object.
  • Link through stable project objects, not ad-hoc phrases.
  • Avoid overlinking every paragraph; keep only meaningful edges.
  • Prefer repairing existing links over creating new auxiliary notes.
  • If the best target is unclear, narrow the search first and use find-canonical-note from obsidian-project-memory when helpful.

Do not assume by default

  • Concepts/
  • Datasets/
  • Maps/
  • Views/
  • .canvas
  • .base

Create those only if the user explicitly asks for them.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.8KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill