Set up an Obsidian knowledge base for a research repository containing code and Markdown. It creates project links, planning notes, source inventories, and code summaries, importing structure and summaries while leaving large research artifacts out.
This skill should be used when the user asks to start a new research project, import an existing code-plus-Markdown repository into Obsidian, or bind the current repository to a compact research knowledge base for future syncing.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Bootstrap a project knowledge base for the current repository.
This is a supporting skill.
Use obsidian-project-memory as the main workflow authority. Use this skill only when a repository still needs its initial binding or rebuild.
obsidian-project-memory detects a research-project candidate but no existing binding.Resolve the vault path from one of:
OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH.python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/obsidian-project-memory/scripts/project_kb.py" detect --cwd "$PWD"
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/obsidian-project-memory/scripts/project_kb.py" bootstrap --cwd "$PWD" --vault-path "$OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH"
.claude/project-memory/registry.yaml.claude/project-memory/<project_id>.mdResearch/{project-slug}/00-Hub.mdResearch/{project-slug}/01-Plan.mdResearch/{project-slug}/Knowledge/Source-Inventory.mdResearch/{project-slug}/Knowledge/Codebase-Overview.mdKnowledge/, Papers/, Experiments/, Results/, or Writing/,.git, .venv, node_modules, caches, checkpoints, binaries, and other heavy artifacts.00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, Knowledge/, Papers/, Experiments/, Results/, Writing/, Daily/, Archive/.python3 is unavailable in the current shell, use the system Python interpreter that can run project_kb.py and say so explicitly.references/BOOTSTRAP-RUNBOOK.md - preflight decisions, failure modes, and post-bootstrap verificationNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.