Review an academic paper before submission by checking structure, logical consistency, citations, figures, tables, and writing clarity. A systematic checklist helps identify missing content and issues to address after drafting or revision.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality assurance checklist for academic papers.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission.
Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards:
Verify the logical coherence of the paper:
Check the completeness and accuracy of citations:
Evaluate the quality and effectiveness of figures and tables:
Check writing clarity and readability:
Use this checklist for systematic paper self-review:
Paper Quality Checklist:
- [ ] Abstract includes problem, method, results, contributions
- [ ] Introduction clearly states research motivation
- [ ] Method is reproducible
- [ ] Results support conclusions
- [ ] Discussion addresses limitations
- [ ] All figures/tables have captions
- [ ] Citations are complete and accurate
Use this skill in the following scenarios:
Follow these steps for systematic paper review:
Start with the overall structure, checking if all sections are complete and logically coherent.
Dive into each section, checking content accuracy and completeness.
Verify the completeness and accuracy of all citations.
Check the quality and captions of all figures and tables.
Review language expression and writing clarity.
Use the quality checklist for final verification.
The Paper Self-Review skill provides a systematic paper quality checking process, helping researchers identify and resolve issues before submission, improving paper quality and acceptance rates.
Load only what is needed:
references/SECTION-CHECKLIST.md - section-by-section review questionsreferences/FINAL-VERDICT.md - how to summarize submission readiness and blocking issuesexamples/example-self-review.md - example review outputNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.