Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

skill-development

Create or repair Claude skills in the current local environment. Clarify when each skill should run, streamline SKILL.md, organize supporting files, and check that referenced resources exist so the instructions remain consistent and reusable.

OriginalShow the original description

This skill should be used when the user asks to create a new skill, repair an existing skill, improve trigger descriptions, reorganize skill structure, or make a Claude skill more reusable and internally consistent.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Create a Claude skill with a clear purpose
  • Improve descriptions that determine when a skill runs
  • Reorganize an overly long SKILL.md
  • Repair missing files and outdated local references

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • references/checklist.md640 B
  • references/integrity-checks.md610 B
  • references/skill-creator-original.md11.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Skill Development

Use this skill to create or repair Claude skills in the current local environment, not in an abstract plugin template.

Goal

Produce a skill that is:

  • easy to trigger,
  • lean at the SKILL.md layer,
  • backed by real references/, examples/, and scripts/ files when they are mentioned,
  • free of dead local references.

Core rules

  • Keep one skill = one durable job.
  • Treat the frontmatter description as the main trigger surface.
  • Keep SKILL.md focused on workflow and boundaries.
  • Move detailed catalogs, templates, and long explanations into references/ or examples/.
  • Do not mention files that do not exist.
  • Do not inherit stale names, agents, or sibling skill references without verifying they exist locally.

Default workflow

1. Inspect the current environment first

Before writing anything:

  • inspect the target skill directory,
  • inspect neighboring skills that already solve a similar problem,
  • verify which agents, commands, and sibling skills actually exist,
  • identify stale references before adding new ones.

Use the local inventory as the authority. Do not write guidance against an imagined plugin layout.

2. Lock the skill contract

Define four things before editing:

  1. what the skill does,
  2. what triggers it,
  3. what it explicitly does not do,
  4. which bundled resources are actually needed.

If the skill only needs a short workflow, keep it short. Do not create references/, examples/, or scripts/ just because the directories are conventional.

3. Write or repair the frontmatter

The frontmatter should:

  • use the real skill identifier in name,
  • use a third-person trigger description,
  • include concrete phrases a user would naturally say,
  • stay short enough to scan quickly.

Prefer descriptions of this form:

---
name: skill-name
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "...", "...", or needs help with ....
---

4. Keep the main file lean

A good SKILL.md should usually contain:

  • a short goal section,
  • role boundaries,
  • a default workflow,
  • safety or quality rules,
  • a short list of additional resources.

Move these out of the main file when they get long:

  • templates,
  • exhaustive checklists,
  • edge-case catalogs,
  • sample outputs,
  • long examples.

5. Add only real bundled resources

Use bundled resources deliberately:

  • references/ for detailed guidance that may be loaded selectively,
  • examples/ for real example outputs or scaffolds,
  • scripts/ for deterministic helper logic.

If a resource is mentioned in SKILL.md, it must exist. If a resource exists but is never referenced or used, delete it.

6. Run integrity checks before closing

At minimum, verify:

  • frontmatter parses,
  • referenced local files exist,
  • sibling skill or agent references are real,
  • SKILL.md is not overloaded with material that belongs in references,
  • temporary logs, caches, and editor artifacts are not left inside the skill directory.

Typical repair patterns

When the skill is too long

  • keep the trigger and workflow in SKILL.md,
  • move catalogs and deep detail into references/,
  • keep a short read order so another model knows what to load first.

When the skill is too thin

  • add a default workflow,
  • add at least one concrete example or checklist,
  • make the boundaries explicit so the skill is not just a slogan.

When the skill has stale references

  • remove dead paths immediately,
  • replace historical names with current local names,
  • re-check neighboring agents/commands/skills against the live directory.

Recommended output shape

When creating or repairing a skill, prefer ending with:

  • what changed,
  • which files were created or updated,
  • what integrity checks were run,
  • what still needs manual follow-up, if anything.

References

Load only what is needed:

  • references/checklist.md - compact quality checklist before closing a skill edit
  • references/integrity-checks.md - concrete local checks for missing files, dead references, and drift
  • references/skill-creator-original.md - legacy background reference; use for context, not as the live source of truth

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill