Carry a research task from brainstorming and planning through code implementation, review, and documentation. Multiple agents handle independent implementation tasks in parallel, then report the resulting files, changes, and findings.
Full autonomous research workflow using swarm mode for parallel execution
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Swarm-enabled LFG. Run these steps in order, parallelizing where indicated. Do not stop between steps — complete every step through to the end.
/workflows:brainstorm $ARGUMENTS
Gate: must produce a file in docs/brainstorms/ before proceeding.
/workflows:plan
Gate: must produce a file in docs/plans/ before proceeding.
/workflows:work — Use swarm mode: Break the plan into independent tasks and launch parallel subagents via Task tool to build them concurrently. Each subagent handles one task from the plan. See references/orchestration-patterns.md for parallel dispatch patterns.
Gate: must produce at least one code change (committed or staged) before proceeding. If work fails with no changes, stop and report the failure.
After work completes, launch steps 4 and 5 as parallel swarm agents (both only need completed code to operate):
/workflows:review — spawn as background Task agent/workflows:compound — spawn as background Task agentWait for both to complete before finishing.
When all steps are done, output:
Research workflow complete.
Brainstorm: [brainstorm file path]
Plan: [plan file path]
Work: [summary of implementation]
Review: [summary of findings]
Documentation: [docs/solutions/ path if created]
Start with step 1 now.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.
Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.
Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.
Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.
Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.
Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.