Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

web-research

Research online topics by dividing questions among delegated agents, each handling a separate subtopic. Saves the plan and findings, then combines multiple web sources into a cited response that identifies gaps and limitations.

OriginalShow the original description

Searches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Researching current information across multiple web sources
  • Comparing options through separate research subtopics
  • Preparing a report with source URLs
  • Keeping research plans and findings organized

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Web Research Skill

Research Process

Step 1: Create and Save Research Plan

Before delegating to subagents, you MUST:

  1. Create a research folder - Organize all research files in a dedicated folder relative to the current working directory:

    mkdir research_[topic_name]
    

    This keeps files organized and prevents clutter in the working directory.

  2. Analyze the research question - Break it down into distinct, non-overlapping subtopics

  3. Write a research plan file - Use the write_file tool to create research_[topic_name]/research_plan.md containing:

    • The main research question
    • 2-5 specific subtopics to investigate
    • Expected information from each subtopic
    • How results will be synthesized

Planning Guidelines:

  • Simple fact-finding: 1-2 subtopics
  • Comparative analysis: 1 subtopic per comparison element (max 3)
  • Complex investigations: 3-5 subtopics

Step 2: Delegate to Research Subagents

For each subtopic in your plan:

  1. Use the task tool to spawn a research subagent with:

    • Clear, specific research question (no acronyms)
    • Instructions to write findings to a file: research_[topic_name]/findings_[subtopic].md
    • Budget: 3-5 web searches maximum
  2. Run up to 3 subagents in parallel for efficient research

Subagent Instructions Template:

Research [SPECIFIC TOPIC]. Use the web_search tool to gather information.
After completing your research, use write_file to save your findings to research_[topic_name]/findings_[subtopic].md.
Include key facts, relevant quotes, and source URLs.
Use 3-5 web searches maximum.

Step 3: Synthesize Findings

After all subagents complete:

  1. Review the findings files that were saved locally:

    • First run list_files research_[topic_name] to see what files were created
    • Then use read_file with the file paths (e.g., research_[topic_name]/findings_*.md)
    • Important: Use read_file for LOCAL files only, not URLs
  2. Synthesize the information - Create a comprehensive response that:

    • Directly answers the original question
    • Integrates insights from all subtopics
    • Cites specific sources with URLs (from the findings files)
    • Identifies any gaps or limitations
  3. Write final report (optional) - Use write_file to create research_[topic_name]/research_report.md if requested

Note: If you need to fetch additional information from URLs, use the fetch_url tool, not read_file.

Best Practices

  • Plan before delegating - Always write research_plan.md first
  • Clear subtopics - Ensure each subagent has distinct, non-overlapping scope
  • File-based communication - Have subagents save findings to files, not return them directly
  • Systematic synthesis - Read all findings files before creating final response
  • Stop appropriately - Don't over-research; 3-5 searches per subtopic is usually sufficient

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a1

FreeSummary

Turn a broad research idea into clear, testable questions. Compare familiar and less conventional approaches, structure the selected question around its population and methods, and assess variables, feasibility, and potential theoretical contributions.

  • Turn a research topic into testable questions
  • Narrow an overly broad research question
  • Compare alternative research angles
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a2

FreeSummary

Helps build a research framework by comparing theories, mapping relationships between variables, and deriving testable hypotheses. Explores less conventional options, examines weaknesses and competing explanations, and produces diagrams with anticipated reviewer objections.

  • Comparing theories for a research question
  • Deriving hypotheses from relationships between variables
  • Examining weaknesses and anticipated reviewer objections
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

a5

FreeSummary

Clarify the philosophical assumptions behind a research project and check whether they fit the proposed methods. Get a reasoned research stance, draft proposal wording, and guidance for explaining how the researcher's background and values shape the study.

  • Clarifying philosophical foundations for a research proposal
  • Explaining why the chosen research methods fit the study
  • Drafting a statement about the researcher's position
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

academic-paper

FreeSummary

Plan and draft academic papers through specialized agent roles covering literature, arguments, citations, and review. Get chapter guidance, revision roadmaps, Traditional Chinese and English abstracts, and documents formatted as LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, or Markdown.

  • Planning a paper chapter by chapter
  • Drafting a paper from research materials
  • Turning reviewer comments into a revision roadmap
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn a detailed outline into a philosophy or interdisciplinary manuscript. Draft chapters with repeated quality reviews, check terminology and arguments across sections, and prepare the manuscript, evaluation reports, abstract, and metadata for submission.

  • Draft a full paper from a detailed outline
  • Review argument and citation quality chapter by chapter
  • Check terminology and argument flow across chapters
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Simulate academic peer review through five reviewer roles tailored to the paper's field. Receive separate critiques, an editorial decision, and a prioritized revision roadmap, or check whether a revised manuscript addresses earlier comments.

  • Review a manuscript before journal submission
  • Examine research methods and statistical validity
  • Challenge core arguments and alternative explanations
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.7KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill