Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aaai-camera-ready

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AAAI Camera Ready

Use this after AAAI acceptance. Reopen the current camera-ready email, publication/attendance page, author kit, copyright instructions, and proceedings source-file requirements.

Camera-ready checklist

  • Apply the current AAAI proceedings template and page rules. AAAI-27 allocates accepted main-track papers 7 proceedings pages plus up to 2 acknowledgement/reference pages, with an option to purchase up to two additional technical-content pages at $300 each. Camera-ready source files are due 2026-12-14.
  • Prepare source files as required: LaTeX or Word source, figures, bibliography, style files, and a high-resolution PDF.
  • Add author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding, and ethical disclosures where required.
  • Keep all references from the submitted paper unless superseded, and explain major citation updates conservatively.
  • Resolve reviewer-facing clarity issues without changing the scientific identity of the paper.
  • Complete copyright transfer and any AAAI Digital Library metadata.
  • Ensure at least one author registers and presents the paper, unless current exceptional-circumstance procedures apply.

AAAI Press production gotchas

AAAI Press compiles the proceedings from your source, so a PDF that looks fine locally can still be kicked back. The two-column AAAI style is strict about a few things that trip up authors arriving from single-column or NeurIPS-style submissions:

  • Do not alter margins, font sizes, or column gap; AAAI explicitly forbids style hacks to gain space. If you need room, purchase technical pages instead of shrinking the template.
  • Disable \pdfoutput overrides and embed all fonts; non-embedded fonts are a common rejection.
  • Move references and acknowledgments into the pages that do not count against the technical limit, per the current rule, rather than padding the main body.
  • Restore author block, funding, and ethics statements that were stripped for double-blind review.

Deanonymization sweep

Acceptance reverses the anonymity discipline: now identity must be present and correct, while stale blind-mode placeholders must go. Walk the paper, supplement, and code for "Anonymous", redacted citations to your own prior work, and \\if-blind toggles still set to blind.

Worked vignette

A knowledge-representation paper lands at 7.5 technical pages after restoring the author block and an ethics statement. Decision: it cannot shrink the template, so the author buys one extra technical page (within the current cap), keeps references on the non-counting pages, and re-runs the deanonymization sweep before uploading source to AAAI Press.

Release plan

  • Replace anonymous code/data links with durable public repositories or archives.
  • Publish a project page only if it is stable, accurate, and does not overclaim beyond the paper.
  • Preserve a copy of the submitted PDF, reviews, rebuttal, accepted PDF, source package, and artifact release for future journal extensions.

Output format

[Camera-ready state] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Proceedings files] <PDF/source/bib/figures/supplement>
[Page status] within limit / extra pages needed / over limit
[Publication obligations] copyright / registration / presentation / metadata
[Final fixes] <ordered list before upload>

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill