Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

building-statistical-arbitrage-models

Constructs stat arb strategies with pair selection, signal generation, and portfolio optimization under market neutrality constraints. Use when building stat arb models, designing market-neutral strategies, or optimizing pair portfolios.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Building Statistical Arbitrage Models

When To Use

  • Designing a pairs trading or multi-leg market-neutral strategy from scratch
  • Selecting cointegrated or correlated asset pairs from a candidate universe
  • Generating entry/exit signals based on spread dynamics (z-score, Kalman filter, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck)
  • Constructing a portfolio of stat arb positions with sector/beta neutrality constraints
  • Backtesting and stress-testing an existing stat arb model before live deployment
  • Migrating a discretionary relative-value approach into a systematic framework

Inputs To Gather

  • Asset universe: equity tickers, ETFs, futures, or other instruments with sufficient liquidity and history (minimum 3–5 years daily data recommended)
  • Pair selection criteria: cointegration test choice (Engle-Granger, Johansen), minimum half-life, correlation thresholds, sector/industry filters
  • Signal parameters: lookback window, z-score entry/exit thresholds, regime-detection toggles
  • Risk constraints: target gross/net exposure, maximum single-pair allocation, sector neutrality tolerance, beta-to-benchmark cap
  • Cost assumptions: commission per share, estimated slippage model, borrow cost/availability for short legs [VERIFY against current prime broker schedule]
  • Backtest parameters: in-sample vs. out-of-sample split, rebalance frequency, transaction cost treatment

Workflow

1. Universe Screening and Pair Formation

  • Pull adjusted close prices for the candidate universe; verify for survivorship bias and corporate actions
  • Compute pairwise cointegration tests across the universe; rank by test statistic significance
  • Filter pairs: discard those with half-life outside target range (e.g., 5–60 trading days), insufficient cointegration p-value (< 0.05), or same-entity overlap
  • Group surviving pairs by sector or factor exposure to ensure portfolio diversification

2. Spread Construction and Signal Design

  • For each pair, estimate the hedge ratio via OLS, total least squares, or Kalman filter (dynamic hedge ratio preferred for non-stationary betas)
  • Construct the spread series: spread_t = price_A_t − hedge_ratio × price_B_t
  • Normalize spread to a z-score using a rolling lookback window; calibrate window length to the estimated half-life
  • Define signal rules:
    • Entry long spread: z-score < −entry_threshold (e.g., −2.0)
    • Entry short spread: z-score > +entry_threshold
    • Exit: z-score reverts within ±exit_threshold (e.g., ±0.5) or stop-loss at ±stop_threshold (e.g., ±4.0)
  • Optionally layer regime filters (e.g., suppress signals when realized spread volatility exceeds 2× its historical median)

3. Portfolio Construction Under Neutrality Constraints

  • Allocate capital across active pairs using risk-parity, equal-dollar, or mean-variance weighting
  • Enforce constraints:
    • Net dollar exposure ≤ target (e.g., ±5% of gross)
    • Net beta-to-index ≤ tolerance (e.g., ±0.10)
    • Single-pair concentration ≤ max allocation (e.g., 5% of gross)
    • Sector net exposure ≤ sector cap [VERIFY sector classification source: GICS, ICB, or custom]
  • Rebalance at defined frequency; recalculate hedge ratios and re-run cointegration tests at each rebalance to retire degraded pairs

4. Backtest and Performance Attribution

  • Run full backtest on the in-sample period with realistic transaction costs and borrow costs
  • Compute key metrics: annualized return, Sharpe ratio, max drawdown, average holding period, win rate, profit factor
  • Decompose PnL by pair, sector, and signal type to identify concentration risk
  • Re-run on the out-of-sample period; flag any Sharpe degradation > 30% as potential overfit indicator
  • Perform sensitivity analysis on entry/exit thresholds, lookback window, and hedge-ratio method

5. Risk and Stress Testing

  • Simulate spread blow-ups: what happens if a pair's cointegration breaks permanently (structural break scenario)?
  • Test under regime-specific stress periods (e.g., 2008 credit crisis, 2020 COVID dislocation, 2022 rate shock) [VERIFY data availability for chosen stress windows]
  • Evaluate margin/liquidity impact: model margin calls under 3× normal spread volatility
  • Check correlation of pair PnLs during stress — if pairwise correlation spikes, the portfolio loses diversification benefit

Output

Deliver a stat arb model package containing:

  • Pair selection report: list of qualifying pairs with cointegration statistics, half-life, and sector labels
  • Signal specification: entry/exit rules with parameterized thresholds and regime filters
  • Portfolio allocation matrix: pair weights, gross/net exposure, beta exposure, and sector exposure
  • Backtest results: equity curve, performance metrics (Sharpe, max drawdown, Calmar), in-sample vs. out-of-sample comparison
  • Risk report: stress-test outcomes, break-even cost analysis, sensitivity tables for key parameters
  • Implementation notes: rebalance schedule, hedge-ratio update cadence, pair retirement criteria, and data pipeline requirements

Quality Checks

  • Confirm cointegration tests use the correct critical values for the number of pairs tested (Bonferroni or Holm correction for multiple comparisons)
  • Verify hedge ratios are estimated on properly aligned, split/dividend-adjusted data
  • Ensure backtest does not embed look-ahead bias (signals use only data available at signal time)
  • Validate that transaction cost assumptions reflect current market conditions [VERIFY borrow costs for hard-to-borrow names]
  • Check that portfolio-level neutrality constraints are satisfied at every rebalance point, not just on average
  • Confirm out-of-sample period is truly held out and not used for any parameter tuning
  • Flag any pair where the spread half-life drifts above the maximum threshold during the backtest as a candidate for early retirement

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by CaseMark

Report a problem with this skill