Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

modeling-merger-arbitrage-spreads

Calculates merger arb risk/reward with annualized spread, deal break probability, and downside scenario analysis. Use when analyzing merger arb, calculating spread returns, or evaluating deal completion probability.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Modeling Merger Arbitrage Spreads

When To Use

  • Evaluating risk/reward on an announced merger or acquisition before entering an arb position
  • Sizing existing positions by quantifying annualized return vs. deal-break downside
  • Comparing multiple pending deals to allocate capital across a merger arb book
  • Stress-testing a deal's attractiveness under varying close timelines or regulatory outcomes
  • Reviewing a deal after material developments (amended terms, regulatory challenge, competing bid)

Inputs To Gather

  • Deal terms: Offer price (cash, stock, or mixed consideration), exchange ratio (if stock deal), collar provisions, CVRs or earnouts, election mechanics
  • Current market prices: Target current trading price, acquirer current price (for stock deals)
  • Timeline: Announcement date, expected close date, outside date / drop-dead date, key regulatory milestones (HSR expiry, EC Phase I/II deadlines, CFIUS review windows) [VERIFY jurisdiction-specific regulatory timelines]
  • Deal break probability estimate: Base rate from comparable deal universe, adjusted for deal-specific factors (regulatory risk, financing conditions, shareholder vote risk, MAC clause breadth)
  • Downside price (deal-break scenario): Target's unaffected pre-announcement price, comparable trading multiples, analyst consensus standalone valuation
  • Financing & cost of carry: Borrow cost for short leg (stock deals), dividend expectations on both legs, margin/capital requirements
  • Risk-free rate: Current Treasury yield matching expected deal duration for annualization benchmark

Workflow

  1. Calculate gross spread

    • Cash deal: (Offer Price − Target Price) / Target Price
    • Stock deal: (Exchange Ratio × Acquirer Price − Target Price) / Target Price
    • Mixed consideration: weight cash and stock components proportionally
    • Adjust for dividends receivable/payable during holding period and short borrow costs (stock deals)
  2. Annualize the spread

    • Estimate days to close from current date to expected completion
    • Annualized Spread = Gross Spread × (365 / Days to Close)
    • Flag deals where annualized spread is below risk-free rate as potentially mispriced or low-risk consensus deals
  3. Estimate deal break probability

    • Start with historical base rate for deal type (e.g., strategic cash deals ~3-5%, cross-border with antitrust review ~8-15%) [VERIFY against current deal completion databases]
    • Adjust upward/downward for: regulatory complexity, financing conditionality, bidder strategic commitment, target board unanimity, shareholder composition, litigation risk
    • Document the rationale for each adjustment explicitly
  4. Model downside scenario

    • Determine target's standalone value absent the deal (pre-announcement price, peer-group multiples, DCF if available)
    • Downside Loss = (Target Price − Standalone Value) / Target Price
    • For stock deals, also estimate acquirer price recovery on deal break (acquirer often rises)
  5. Calculate expected return

    • Expected Return = (Probability of Close × Gross Spread) − (Probability of Break × Downside Loss)
    • Annualized Expected Return = Expected Return × (365 / Days to Close)
    • Compare against hurdle rate and portfolio opportunity cost
  6. Run sensitivity analysis

    • Vary deal break probability in increments (e.g., 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%)
    • Vary days to close (base case, +30 days, +90 days for regulatory delay)
    • Vary downside price (−5%, −10%, −15% from current standalone estimate)
    • Identify breakeven deal break probability where expected return = 0
  7. Assess deal-specific risk factors

    • Antitrust: market concentration, overlapping product lines, jurisdiction (DOJ/FTC, EC, CMA, SAMR) [VERIFY relevant regulatory bodies]
    • Financing: committed vs. uncommitted financing, market conditions, material adverse change triggers
    • Shareholder vote: required approval thresholds, activist or dissenting shareholder positions
    • Competing bids: likelihood of topping bid, break-up fee magnitude as % of deal value

Output

  • Spread summary table: Current spread (%), annualized spread (%), days to expected close, gross P&L per share
  • Probability-weighted return: Expected return at base-case break probability, annualized
  • Sensitivity matrix: Grid showing annualized expected return across break probability × days to close combinations
  • Breakeven analysis: Deal break probability at which expected return reaches zero
  • Risk factor scorecard: Qualitative assessment (Low / Medium / High) for each major risk category with brief rationale
  • Position sizing implication: Suggested position weight relative to portfolio given Kelly-style or risk-parity framework (flagged as illustrative, not a recommendation)

Quality Checks

  • Verify that gross spread calculation matches observable market data (cross-check with broker or data terminal quotes)
  • Confirm annualized spread uses calendar days and accounts for any known interim milestones that may accelerate or delay close
  • Ensure downside estimate is grounded in pre-announcement trading levels or fundamental valuation, not arbitrary haircuts
  • Check that deal break probability adjustments are directionally consistent and documented with reasoning
  • Validate that sensitivity ranges cover plausible tail scenarios, not just narrow base-case variations
  • For stock deals, confirm exchange ratio type (fixed vs. floating) and collar bounds are correctly modeled [VERIFY deal-specific merger agreement terms]
  • Flag any assumption that relies on a single data source or undisclosed estimate with [VERIFY]

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

CaseMark/skills46Updated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by CaseMark

Report a problem with this skill