Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

completion-verification

Verifies that work is actually complete before it is claimed to be — running the checks, reading the output, and confirming the original request was satisfied rather than approximated. Use this before saying something is done, fixed, or passing; before committing or opening a pull request; and whenever a claim of success has not been backed by command output.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Completion verification

The gap between "should work" and "does work" is where most wasted cycles live. This closes it.

Before claiming done

  1. Run the real check, not a subset. The command the project gates on, on the current state of the tree.
  2. Read the output. An exit code of zero with skipped tests, or a build with new warnings, is not what it looks like at a glance.
  3. Re-read the original request. Not your interpretation of it several steps ago — the actual words. Confirm each part was addressed, and name any part that was not.
  4. Check for collateral damage. What else consumes what you changed? Did anything else move?
  5. Confirm nothing was left behind — debug statements, a skipped test, a TODO standing in for the hard case.

What a claim must carry

Say what you ran and what it said. "Tests pass" is an assertion; the command and its output is evidence. If you could not run something, say that explicitly rather than omitting it — an unstated gap reads as a covered one.

Honest incompleteness

Partial work reported accurately is useful. Partial work reported as complete costs someone else the time to discover otherwise, plus the trust. If a part is blocked, unverified, or deliberately skipped, name it in the same breath as the parts that are done.

Never

  • Claim a fix works without having reproduced the failure first.
  • Report success from a stale run.
  • Weaken, skip, or delete a failing test in order to claim green.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

cbrock84/headcount2.1KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by cbrock84

Report a problem with this skill