Have Codex independently review an existing implementation plan while Claude coordinates a bounded revision loop. For automatic reviewer selection from either host, use claudex-loop with mode=review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Compatibility entry point: explicitly use Codex as the plan reviewer. The shared workflow and executable live in the sibling claudex-loop skill; install that skill alongside this one.
In Claude Code, load claudex-loop and start at mode=review, host=claude, reviewer Codex. Preserve PLAN_FILE, LOG_FILE, MAX_ROUNDS / rounds, and explicit model/effort arguments. The invocation authorizes reviewing, not implementation. Do not restart an interview when the supplied plan is already adequate.
In Codex, explain that this explicit command would use the same provider for planning and review. Use the shared claudex-loop mode=review workflow with Claude as the independent reviewer unless the user specifically requested same-provider review. If they did, perform and label that as ordinary Codex review; do not claim cross-provider approval or use the cross-provider approval runner to certify it.
Read the shared runtime reference. Resolve the runner from the installed sibling skill, not the target repository. Use the actual resolved plan path on every round and build handoff. A valid completed result and APPROVED verdict are both required; failed, empty, blocked or malformed results are not approval. The host logs findings and dispositions, and stops at the round cap.
If implementation follows, use the shared build/inspection phase. An independent plan review does not replace independent review of the final code.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Harden a plan with independent Claude/Codex review, then optionally build and cross-inspect it. Start in either Claude Code or Codex: the host plans and the other provider reviews. Use for claudex this plan, claudex-loop, or the legacy crucible trigger; not for trivial edits.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Recommend a model and a scoped handoff for a task in Claude Code or Codex. Use when choosing who should handle a task, seeking a second opinion, getting unstuck, or delegating focused work; execute one handoff when requested.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Have Codex implement a concrete work order and have Claude independently inspect the final changes. Preserves the explicit Codex builder choice; use claudex-loop for host-based planning and automatic reviewer selection.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.