Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when requesting code review before merge or after substantial changes; provide focused requirements, diff range, and severity-calibrated review instructions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Request a focused code review to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation, never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Request a read-only code review:
Ask a reviewer to use the template at references/code-reviewer.md.
Placeholders:
{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Requesting code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Request code review]
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
[Reviewer returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Controller-led development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: references/code-reviewer.md
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Guide accessibility reviews for UI, documents, and workflows. Use for WCAG-oriented audits, keyboard review, semantics, contrast, and remediation planning.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when choosing a LocalSetup Agent-* lane for exploration, research, bounded implementation, or review. Consult the static capability matrix; do not probe account or network availability.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guide agent email inbox workflows with prompt-injection defenses. Use for inbound email processing, webhooks, routing, and safety review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Navigate and understand codebases using agentlens hierarchical documentation. Use when exploring new projects, finding modules, locating symbols in large files, finding TODOs/warnings, or understanding code structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for Agent Q signed encrypted file-drop or mail ship and ingest, private registry v2 setup, queue status, and transport maintenance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inventory wrapper for the alirezarezvani Claude skills bundle. Use when triaging its broad skill catalog and large script surface before any targeted import.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.