Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

sr:validate

Phase 7 of the SRS workflow. Runs srs_validator.py --dir on the generated SRS files, reports errors and warnings, auto-fixes ERRORs, and outputs a COMPLIANT / PARTIALLY COMPLIANT / NON-COMPLIANT verdict.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

sr:validate

Goal: validate the generated SRS against IEEE 830-1998. Fix all ERRORs before reporting. WARNings are captured for the improvement report.


Step 0 — Identify Project

AskUserQuestion: "Which project to validate? (slug)"

Check that projects/{slug}/srs/ exists and contains .md files. If missing: tell user to run /sr:generate first.


Step 1 — Run Validator

Execute:

python .claude/scripts/srs_validator.py --dir projects/{slug}/srs/

Capture stdout. Display the full validation table.


Step 2 — Fix ERRORs Immediately

For each ERROR finding:

  1. Identify the affected SRS section file
  2. Fix the issue following IEEE 830 rules:
    • missing-section: add the section with correct heading format
    • fr-no-shall: rewrite the Requirement line with explicit "shall" clause
    • fr-numbering-gap: renumber FRs to fill gaps (update all references)
  3. State what was fixed: FIXED [ERROR] fr-no-shall in FR-07 → added "shall" clause

After fixing all ERRORs: re-run validator and confirm no new ERRORs.


Step 3 — Collect WARNings

List all WARN findings but do NOT fix them here — they go into the improvement report.

Format:

WARN: unresolved-tag — 3 [TBD] tags remain (NFR-03, NFR-07, §1.3)
WARN: fr-incomplete-gwt — FR-12: missing "Then:" field
WARN: nfr-no-numeric — NFR-05 Response Measure has no numeric threshold

Step 4 — Verdict

Output:

## Validation Result

Verdict: COMPLIANT | PARTIALLY COMPLIANT | NON-COMPLIANT
File:    projects/{slug}/srs/ ({N} files)

ERRORs fixed:  {count}
WARNings open: {count} → captured in /sr:improve report

Next: /sr:improve → improvement report + warning resolution guide

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

ck-fix

Free

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills19Updated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by DangQuangSE

Report a problem with this skill