Compare systems, rules, documents, plans, or goals to identify shared aims, useful tensions, duplication, and genuine conflicts. The skill grounds findings in the inputs and returns ranked recommendations for improving coherence; it analyzes read-only and does not edit them.
Harmony analysis across any set of inputs (systems, rules, skills, goals, documents, plans), defaulting to all of LifeOS and its subcomponents when none are named. Extracts each input's core principles and ultimate aim, maps where they reinforce, pull in productive tension, duplicate, or work against each other, runs FirstPrinciples, Superior and SystemsThinking (plus other thinking skills as fit) to find the real conflicts, and recommends ranked changes that bring the whole into unity. Read-only; recommends, never edits. USE WHEN unify, harmonize, harmony check, are these in harmony, are these working against each other, do these conflict, where do these contradict, coherence check, unify LifeOS, is LifeOS coherent, are my systems fighting each other, alignment across components, bring these into unity. NOT FOR attacking one plan (RedTeam), feedback loops of one system (SystemsThinking), trimming prompt rules (BitterLessonEngineering), climbing one target (HillClimb), editing personal goals (use Telos).
Run score Not tested
See how to installUnify reads a set of systems, rules, skills, goals, documents, or plans and identifies their aims and guiding principles. It maps where the inputs support one another, have useful tensions, duplicate each other, or genuinely conflict. It checks the source material behind each input instead of treating different wording as proof of disagreement. The result is a ranked set of recommendations for improving coherence, grounded in the inputs.
Use Unify to check whether several policies or plans point in the same direction, or to find conflicts and duplication among operating rules. If you do not name a set of inputs, the skill analyzes the LifeOS components specified in its configuration.
The analysis is read-only and does not edit the inputs. An analysis of LifeOS as a whole requires a configuration file when you do not specify the inputs.
This overview was written by AI (OpenAI Codex) from the public SKILL.md. Check the original below for the exact behavior.
AI checked the SKILL.md for operations that need care and for setup requirements. The score comes only from actually running the skill (hands-on test).
Not counted in the score. Rated by AI (OpenAI Codex) as of Oct 28, 2026. Treat it as a guide and read the original before installing.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Every input worth analyzing exists to achieve something. Put several together and their aims either compound or collide. Unify finds out which, at the level of principles and aims rather than surface wording, and says how to bring the set into one coherent whole.
With no inputs named, the set is LifeOS itself: its constitution, its doctrine, and every subsystem, each judged against the summit they all claim to serve.
| Intent | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| Harmonize | "unify", "harmony check", "are these in harmony", "do these conflict", "unify LifeOS", any set of inputs to reconcile | Intents/Harmonize.md |
| File | Read when |
|---|---|
Setup.md | Config.md is missing for a no-input run, first-time setup, or the config label list |
Read LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Unify/Config.md for the default LifeOS input set, the summit it is judged against, and any standing exclusions. CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR overrides the installation root. When the user names no inputs and this file is missing, stop and say so, pointing at Setup.md; never guess a default set or summit. Named inputs need no config, but a summit still has to be stated from their own sources.
Example 1: Default scope
User: "Run Unify"
→ Harmonize on the default LifeOS set from Config.md
→ Per-component aims, harmony map, conflicts vs tensions, unifying principle
→ Ranked recommendations, each filed as an Upgrades proposal on the principal's yes
Example 2: Named inputs
User: "Are the approval rules, the scheduling rule, and the monitoring layer in harmony?"
→ Harmonize on exactly those three
→ Where self-initiated loops, scheduled workflows and Vigil routing agree or collide
→ Recommendations scoped to those three
Example 3: Outside LifeOS
User: "Unify these three strategy docs" (paths given)
→ Harmonize on the documents
→ Same report shape, judged against the summit the docs share
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Find and fetch vendor cybersecurity reports, then compare their findings on topics such as ransomware, breaches, cloud security, and AI. Analyses identify the reports consulted and cite each figure by vendor, year, and report, including where sources disagree.
Compare a component's own design needs with the goals of the larger system through three structured passes. The result identifies conflicts, recommends an appropriate scope, and assesses whether the proposed design fits the whole.
Find quotes that fit a text’s themes, with attribution and a short reason for each suggestion. Add sourced quotes, research thinkers, and organize a quote collection by theme and usage history to avoid repetition.
Create blog illustrations, technical diagrams, comparisons, comics, and icons through workflows tailored to each format. The skill guides composition, color, and model selection, then stages generated images for review before they are used in a project.
Assess the visual quality of images, films, slides, and site captures against a brief and craft criteria. Two vision judges score the work and rank defects, guiding bounded revision; delivery is gated on a passing critique, with human calibration labels recorded separately.
Find arXiv papers by topic, research category, or paper ID. Retrieve titles, authors, abstracts, and links, check new submissions, and add AlphaXiv's AI-generated overviews when available to help decide which papers to read.