Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

qa-test-planner

Turn feature requirements into test plans, step-by-step manual tests, regression suites for checking existing features, and reproducible bug reports. The skill also supports comparing implemented interfaces with Figma designs and documenting visual differences.

OriginalShow the original description

Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.

Works withFigma
See how to install

Good for

  • Plan tests for a new feature
  • Write manual checkout test cases
  • Organize regression checks before a release
  • Compare implemented screens with Figma designs
  • Document bugs with reproducible steps

Files included (8)

  • SKILL.md18.5 KB
  • README.md10.6 KB
  • references/bug_report_templates.md8.4 KB
  • references/figma_validation.md6.9 KB
  • references/regression_testing.md7.1 KB
  • references/test_case_templates.md9.0 KB
  • scripts/create_bug_report.sh5.8 KB
  • scripts/generate_test_cases.sh6.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

QA Test Planner

A comprehensive skill for QA engineers to create test plans, generate manual test cases, build regression test suites, validate designs against Figma, and document bugs effectively.

Activation: This skill is triggered only when explicitly called by name (e.g., /qa-test-planner, qa-test-planner, or use the skill qa-test-planner).


Quick Start

Create a test plan:

"Create a test plan for the user authentication feature"

Generate test cases:

"Generate manual test cases for the checkout flow"

Build regression suite:

"Build a regression test suite for the payment module"

Validate against Figma:

"Compare the login page against the Figma design at [URL]"

Create bug report:

"Create a bug report for the form validation issue"

Quick Reference

TaskWhat You GetTime
Test PlanStrategy, scope, schedule, risks10-15 min
Test CasesStep-by-step instructions, expected results5-10 min each
Regression SuiteSmoke tests, critical paths, execution order15-20 min
Figma ValidationDesign-implementation comparison, discrepancy list10-15 min
Bug ReportReproducible steps, environment, evidence5 min

How It Works

Your Request
    │
    ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. ANALYZE                                          │
│    • Parse feature/requirement                      │
│    • Identify test types needed                     │
│    • Determine scope and priorities                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 2. GENERATE                                         │
│    • Create structured deliverables                 │
│    • Apply templates and best practices             │
│    • Include edge cases and variations              │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 3. VALIDATE                                         │
│    • Check completeness                             │
│    • Verify traceability                            │
│    • Ensure actionable steps                        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
    │
    ▼
QA Deliverable Ready

Commands

Interactive Scripts

ScriptPurposeUsage
./scripts/generate_test_cases.shCreate test cases interactivelyStep-by-step prompts
./scripts/create_bug_report.shGenerate bug reportsGuided input collection

Natural Language

RequestOutput
"Create test plan for {feature}"Complete test plan document
"Generate {N} test cases for {feature}"Numbered test cases with steps
"Build smoke test suite"Critical path tests
"Compare with Figma at {URL}"Visual validation checklist
"Document bug: {description}"Structured bug report

Core Deliverables

1. Test Plans

  • Test scope and objectives
  • Testing approach and strategy
  • Environment requirements
  • Entry/exit criteria
  • Risk assessment
  • Timeline and milestones

2. Manual Test Cases

  • Step-by-step instructions
  • Expected vs actual results
  • Preconditions and setup
  • Test data requirements
  • Priority and severity

3. Regression Suites

  • Smoke tests (15-30 min)
  • Full regression (2-4 hours)
  • Targeted regression (30-60 min)
  • Execution order and dependencies

4. Figma Validation

  • Component-by-component comparison
  • Spacing and typography checks
  • Color and visual consistency
  • Interactive state validation

5. Bug Reports

  • Clear reproduction steps
  • Environment details
  • Evidence (screenshots, logs)
  • Severity and priority

Anti-Patterns

AvoidWhyInstead
Vague test stepsCan't reproduceSpecific actions + expected results
Missing preconditionsTests fail unexpectedlyDocument all setup requirements
No test dataTester blockedProvide sample data or generation
Generic bug titlesHard to trackSpecific: "[Feature] issue when [action]"
Skip edge casesMiss critical bugsInclude boundary values, nulls

Verification Checklist

Test Plan:

  • Scope clearly defined (in/out)
  • Entry/exit criteria specified
  • Risks identified with mitigations
  • Timeline realistic

Test Cases:

  • Each step has expected result
  • Preconditions documented
  • Test data available
  • Priority assigned

Bug Reports:

  • Reproducible steps
  • Environment documented
  • Screenshots/evidence attached
  • Severity/priority set

References


<details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Test Case Structure</strong></summary>

Standard Test Case Format

## TC-001: [Test Case Title]

**Priority:** High | Medium | Low
**Type:** Functional | UI | Integration | Regression
**Status:** Not Run | Pass | Fail | Blocked

### Objective
[What are we testing and why]

### Preconditions
- [Setup requirement 1]
- [Setup requirement 2]
- [Test data needed]

### Test Steps
1. [Action to perform]
   **Expected:** [What should happen]

2. [Action to perform]
   **Expected:** [What should happen]

3. [Action to perform]
   **Expected:** [What should happen]

### Test Data
- Input: [Test data values]
- User: [Test account details]
- Configuration: [Environment settings]

### Post-conditions
- [System state after test]
- [Cleanup required]

### Notes
- [Edge cases to consider]
- [Related test cases]
- [Known issues]

Test Types

TypeFocusExample
FunctionalBusiness logicLogin with valid credentials
UI/VisualAppearance, layoutButton matches Figma design
IntegrationComponent interactionAPI returns data to frontend
RegressionExisting functionalityPrevious features still work
PerformanceSpeed, load handlingPage loads under 3 seconds
SecurityVulnerabilitiesSQL injection prevented
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Test Plan Template</strong></summary>

Test Plan Structure

# Test Plan: [Feature/Release Name]

## Executive Summary
- Feature/product being tested
- Testing objectives
- Key risks
- Timeline overview

## Test Scope

**In Scope:**
- Features to be tested
- Test types (functional, UI, performance)
- Platforms and environments
- User flows and scenarios

**Out of Scope:**
- Features not being tested
- Known limitations
- Third-party integrations (if applicable)

## Test Strategy

**Test Types:**
- Manual testing
- Exploratory testing
- Regression testing
- Integration testing
- User acceptance testing

**Test Approach:**
- Black box testing
- Positive and negative testing
- Boundary value analysis
- Equivalence partitioning

## Test Environment
- Operating systems
- Browsers and versions
- Devices (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- Test data requirements
- Backend/API environments

## Entry Criteria
- [ ] Requirements documented
- [ ] Designs finalized
- [ ] Test environment ready
- [ ] Test data prepared
- [ ] Build deployed

## Exit Criteria
- [ ] All high-priority test cases executed
- [ ] 90%+ test case pass rate
- [ ] All critical bugs fixed
- [ ] No open high-severity bugs
- [ ] Regression suite passed

## Risk Assessment

| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Mitigation] |

## Test Deliverables
- Test plan document
- Test cases
- Test execution reports
- Bug reports
- Test summary report
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Bug Reporting</strong></summary>

Bug Report Template

# BUG-[ID]: [Clear, specific title]

**Severity:** Critical | High | Medium | Low
**Priority:** P0 | P1 | P2 | P3
**Type:** Functional | UI | Performance | Security
**Status:** Open | In Progress | Fixed | Closed

## Environment
- **OS:** [Windows 11, macOS 14, etc.]
- **Browser:** [Chrome 120, Firefox 121, etc.]
- **Device:** [Desktop, iPhone 15, etc.]
- **Build:** [Version/commit]
- **URL:** [Page where bug occurs]

## Description
[Clear, concise description of the issue]

## Steps to Reproduce
1. [Specific step]
2. [Specific step]
3. [Specific step]

## Expected Behavior
[What should happen]

## Actual Behavior
[What actually happens]

## Visual Evidence
- Screenshot: [attached]
- Video: [link if applicable]
- Console errors: [paste errors]

## Impact
- **User Impact:** [How many users affected]
- **Frequency:** [Always, Sometimes, Rarely]
- **Workaround:** [If one exists]

## Additional Context
- Related to: [Feature/ticket]
- Regression: [Yes/No]
- Figma design: [Link if UI bug]

Severity Definitions

LevelCriteriaExamples
Critical (P0)System crash, data loss, securityPayment fails, login broken
High (P1)Major feature broken, no workaroundSearch not working
Medium (P2)Feature partial, workaround existsFilter missing one option
Low (P3)Cosmetic, rare edge casesTypo, minor alignment
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Figma MCP Integration</strong></summary>

Design Validation Workflow

Prerequisites:

  • Figma MCP server configured
  • Access to Figma design files
  • Figma URLs for components/pages

Process:

  1. Get Design Specs from Figma
"Get the button specifications from Figma file [URL]"

Response includes:
- Dimensions (width, height)
- Colors (background, text, border)
- Typography (font, size, weight)
- Spacing (padding, margin)
- Border radius
- States (default, hover, active, disabled)
  1. Compare Implementation
TC: Primary Button Visual Validation
1. Inspect primary button in browser dev tools
2. Compare against Figma specs:
   - Dimensions: 120x40px
   - Border-radius: 8px
   - Background color: #0066FF
   - Font: 16px Medium #FFFFFF
3. Document discrepancies
  1. Create Bug if Mismatch
BUG: Primary button color doesn't match design
Severity: Medium
Expected (Figma): #0066FF
Actual (Implementation): #0052CC
Screenshot: [attached]
Figma link: [specific component]

What to Validate

ElementWhat to CheckTool
ColorsHex values exactBrowser color picker
SpacingPadding/margin pxDevTools computed styles
TypographyFont, size, weightDevTools font panel
LayoutWidth, height, positionDevTools box model
StatesHover, active, focusManual interaction
ResponsiveBreakpoint behaviorDevTools device mode

Example Queries

"Get button specifications from Figma design [URL]"
"Compare navigation menu implementation against Figma design"
"Extract spacing values for dashboard layout from Figma"
"List all color tokens used in Figma design system"
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Regression Testing</strong></summary>

Suite Structure

Suite TypeDurationFrequencyCoverage
Smoke15-30 minDailyCritical paths only
Targeted30-60 minPer changeAffected areas
Full2-4 hoursWeekly/ReleaseComprehensive
Sanity10-15 minAfter hotfixQuick validation

Building a Regression Suite

Step 1: Identify Critical Paths

  • What can users NOT live without?
  • What generates revenue?
  • What handles sensitive data?
  • What's used most frequently?

Step 2: Prioritize Test Cases

PriorityDescriptionMust Run
P0Business-critical, securityAlways
P1Major features, common flowsWeekly+
P2Minor features, edge casesReleases

Step 3: Execution Order

  1. Smoke first - if fails, stop and fix build
  2. P0 tests next - must pass before proceeding
  3. P1 then P2 - track all failures
  4. Exploratory - find unexpected issues

Pass/Fail Criteria

PASS:

  • All P0 tests pass
  • 90%+ P1 tests pass
  • No critical bugs open

FAIL (Block Release):

  • Any P0 test fails
  • Critical bug discovered
  • Security vulnerability
  • Data loss scenario

CONDITIONAL:

  • P1 failures with workarounds
  • Known issues documented
  • Fix plan in place
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Deep Dive: Test Execution Tracking</strong></summary>

Test Run Report Template

# Test Run: [Release Version]

**Date:** 2024-01-15
**Build:** v2.5.0-rc1
**Tester:** [Name]
**Environment:** Staging

## Summary
- Total Test Cases: 150
- Executed: 145
- Passed: 130
- Failed: 10
- Blocked: 5
- Not Run: 5
- Pass Rate: 90%

## Test Cases by Priority

| Priority | Total | Pass | Fail | Blocked |
|----------|-------|------|------|---------|
| P0 (Critical) | 25 | 23 | 2 | 0 |
| P1 (High) | 50 | 45 | 3 | 2 |
| P2 (Medium) | 50 | 45 | 3 | 2 |
| P3 (Low) | 25 | 17 | 2 | 1 |

## Critical Failures
- TC-045: Payment processing fails
  - Bug: BUG-234
  - Status: Open

## Blocked Tests
- TC-112: Dashboard widget (API endpoint down)

## Risks
- 2 critical bugs blocking release
- Payment integration needs attention

## Next Steps
- Retest after BUG-234 fix
- Complete remaining 5 test cases
- Run full regression before sign-off

Coverage Tracking

## Coverage Matrix

| Feature | Requirements | Test Cases | Status | Gaps |
|---------|--------------|------------|--------|------|
| Login | 8 | 12 | Complete | None |
| Checkout | 15 | 10 | Partial | Payment errors |
| Dashboard | 12 | 15 | Complete | None |
</details> <details> <summary><strong>QA Process Workflow</strong></summary>

Phase 1: Planning

  • Review requirements and designs
  • Create test plan
  • Identify test scenarios
  • Estimate effort and timeline
  • Set up test environment

Phase 2: Test Design

  • Write test cases
  • Review test cases with team
  • Prepare test data
  • Build regression suite
  • Get Figma design access

Phase 3: Execution

  • Execute test cases
  • Log bugs with clear steps
  • Validate against Figma (UI tests)
  • Track test progress
  • Communicate blockers

Phase 4: Reporting

  • Compile test results
  • Analyze coverage
  • Document risks
  • Provide go/no-go recommendation
  • Archive test artifacts
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Best Practices</strong></summary>

Test Case Writing

DO:

  • Be specific and unambiguous
  • Include expected results for each step
  • Test one thing per test case
  • Use consistent naming conventions
  • Keep test cases maintainable

DON'T:

  • Assume knowledge
  • Make test cases too long
  • Skip preconditions
  • Forget edge cases
  • Leave expected results vague

Bug Reporting

DO:

  • Provide clear reproduction steps
  • Include screenshots/videos
  • Specify exact environment details
  • Describe impact on users
  • Link to Figma for UI bugs

DON'T:

  • Report without reproduction steps
  • Use vague descriptions
  • Skip environment details
  • Forget to assign priority
  • Duplicate existing bugs

Regression Testing

DO:

  • Automate repetitive tests when possible
  • Maintain regression suite regularly
  • Prioritize critical paths
  • Run smoke tests frequently
  • Update suite after each release

DON'T:

  • Skip regression before releases
  • Let suite become outdated
  • Test everything every time
  • Ignore failed regression tests
</details>

Examples

<details> <summary><strong>Example: Login Flow Test Case</strong></summary>
## TC-LOGIN-001: Valid User Login

**Priority:** P0 (Critical)
**Type:** Functional
**Estimated Time:** 2 minutes

### Objective
Verify users can successfully login with valid credentials

### Preconditions
- User account exists (test@example.com / Test123!)
- User is not already logged in
- Browser cookies cleared

### Test Steps
1. Navigate to https://app.example.com/login
   **Expected:** Login page displays with email and password fields

2. Enter email: test@example.com
   **Expected:** Email field accepts input

3. Enter password: Test123!
   **Expected:** Password field shows masked characters

4. Click "Login" button
   **Expected:**
   - Loading indicator appears
   - User redirected to /dashboard
   - Welcome message shown: "Welcome back, Test User"
   - Avatar/profile image displayed in header

### Post-conditions
- User session created
- Auth token stored
- Analytics event logged

### Edge Cases to Consider
- TC-LOGIN-002: Invalid password
- TC-LOGIN-003: Non-existent email
- TC-LOGIN-004: SQL injection attempt
- TC-LOGIN-005: Very long password
</details> <details> <summary><strong>Example: Responsive Design Test Case</strong></summary>
## TC-UI-045: Mobile Navigation Menu

**Priority:** P1 (High)
**Type:** UI/Responsive
**Devices:** Mobile (iPhone, Android)

### Objective
Verify navigation menu works correctly on mobile devices

### Preconditions
- Access from mobile device or responsive mode
- Viewport width: 375px (iPhone SE) to 428px (iPhone Pro Max)

### Test Steps
1. Open homepage on mobile device
   **Expected:** Hamburger menu icon visible (top-right)

2. Tap hamburger icon
   **Expected:**
   - Menu slides in from right
   - Overlay appears over content
   - Close (X) button visible

3. Tap menu item
   **Expected:** Navigate to section, menu closes

4. Compare against Figma mobile design [link]
   **Expected:**
   - Menu width: 280px
   - Slide animation: 300ms ease-out
   - Overlay opacity: 0.5, color #000000
   - Font size: 16px, line-height 24px

### Breakpoints to Test
- 375px (iPhone SE)
- 390px (iPhone 14)
- 428px (iPhone 14 Pro Max)
- 360px (Galaxy S21)
</details>

"Testing shows the presence, not the absence of bugs." - Edsger Dijkstra

"Quality is not an act, it is a habit." - Aristotle

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Create interactive 3D scenes for websites, including product views and scroll-driven animations. Covers choosing Three.js, React Three Fiber, or Spline, preparing lightweight models, showing loading progress, and adapting experiences for mobile devices.

  • Building an interactive 3D product configurator
  • Adding 3D scenes to a portfolio
  • Animating models and cameras as visitors scroll
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

ab-test-setup

FreeSummary

Plan A/B tests that compare page or product changes, with clear hypotheses, sample sizes, success metrics, and traffic allocation. Get a structured test plan and guidance for interpreting results and deciding what to try next.

  • Comparing signup button copy
  • Planning a pricing page experiment
  • Estimating sample size and test duration
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

Prepare an academic CV for faculty, postdoctoral, or research applications. Organize publications, grants, teaching, and research experience, with section order and formatting adapted to the role and academic field.

  • Preparing a CV for faculty applications
  • Updating a CV for postdoctoral applications
  • Organizing publications and research funding
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

accessibility

FreeSummary

Audit and improve web accessibility using WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Covers image descriptions, color contrast, keyboard controls, forms, and screen reader support, with code examples and automated and manual checks to guide fixes.

  • Auditing accessibility before a website launch
  • Improving keyboard navigation
  • Fixing form labels and error announcements
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

Audit websites for accessibility barriers and improve image descriptions, color contrast, forms, keyboard navigation, and screen reader support. Provides code examples and automated and manual testing guidance for work toward WCAG 2.1 AA or AAA accessibility standards.

  • Auditing a website for accessibility issues
  • Fixing form labels and error announcements
  • Checking keyboard navigation and dialog focus
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

Design autonomous agents for Claude Code plugins, including when they should run, what tools they may use, and how they should respond. Provides configuration templates, prompt guidance, and validation steps for creating agent files.

  • Create a code review agent
  • Refine examples that trigger an agent
  • Limit the tools an agent can use
davila7/claude-code-templates32.7KUpdated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by davila7

Report a problem with this skill