Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

bug-triage

Review unresolved game bugs by separating impact from urgency, then recommend repair priorities and sprint assignments, meaning work planned for a development cycle. Reports also highlight recurring problems, older issues, and bugs in previously completed work.

OriginalShow the original description

Re-evaluate open bugs — priority vs severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends. Run when the count grows.

See how to install

Good for

  • Prioritizing open bugs at the start of a sprint
  • Organizing new bugs after a team QA review
  • Reviewing a backlog with more than ten open bugs
  • Examining bug trends without changing assignments

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md9.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys automation,workflow

Automation mode: Resolve modes.automation (project.local.yaml → project.yaml → default collaborative). Every AskUserQuestion call and every file write follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds; automation_always_ask categories always prompt).

Bug Triage

This skill processes the open bug backlog into a prioritised, sprint-assigned action list. It distinguishes between severity (how bad is the impact?) and priority (how urgently must we fix it?), detects systemic trends, and ensures no critical bug is lost between sprints.

Output: production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md

When to run:

  • Sprint start — assign open bugs to the new sprint or backlog
  • After /team-qa completes and new bugs have been filed
  • When the bug count crosses 10+ open items

1. Parse Arguments

Modes:

  • /bug-triage sprint — triage against the current sprint; assign fixable bugs to the sprint backlog; defer the rest
  • /bug-triage full — full triage of all bugs regardless of sprint scope
  • /bug-triage trend — trend analysis only (no assignment); read-only report
  • No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode

2. Load Bug Backlog

Step 2a — Discover bug files

Glob for bug reports in priority order:

  1. production/qa/bugs/*.md — individual bug report files (preferred format)
  2. production/qa/bugs.md — single consolidated bug log (fallback)
  3. Any production/qa/qa-plan-*.md "Bugs Found" table (last resort)

If no bug files found:

"No bug files found in production/qa/bugs/. If bugs are tracked in a different location, adjust the glob pattern. If no bugs exist yet, there is nothing to triage."

Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist. Verdict: COMPLETE — no bug files in production/qa/bugs/; nothing to triage.

In trend mode, do not read full bug bodies. Trend metrics (volume, severity mix, by-system, by-date) are computable from the header fields alone:

Grep pattern="\*\*(Severity|Priority|Status|System|Category|Reported)\*\*" glob="production/qa/bugs/*.md" output_mode="content"

(Bug-report fields are bolded — **Severity**:, - **System**: — so match the **field** form, not a bare line-start Field:.) Full bug bodies are needed only for the priority-vs-severity re-evaluation in sprint/full modes; trend is a read-only report and skips it. (The one deviation check that needs a story's status — "bug filed against a Complete story" — is a targeted story-status grep either way, not a bug-body read.)

Step 2b — Load sprint context

Read the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ to understand:

  • Current sprint number / name
  • Stories in scope (for assignment target)
  • Sprint capacity constraints (if noted)

If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only." At workflow: minimal there are no sprints by design — say that instead, and name the P1 bugs as the next fixes, ahead of the next story in the brief's build order.

Step 2c — Load severity reference

Read .claude/docs/coding-standards.md for severity/priority definitions if they exist. If they do not exist, use the standard definitions in Step 3.


3. Classify Each Bug

For each bug, extract or infer:

Severity (impact of the bug)

SeverityDefinition
S1 — CriticalGame crashes, data loss, or complete feature failure. Cannot proceed past this point.
S2 — HighMajor feature broken but game is still playable. Significant wrong behaviour.
S3 — MediumFeature degraded but a workaround exists. Minor wrong behaviour.
S4 — LowVisual glitch, cosmetic issue, typo. No gameplay impact.

Priority (urgency of the fix)

PriorityDefinition
P1 — Fix this sprintBlocks QA, blocks release, or is regression from last sprint
P2 — Fix soonShould be resolved before the next major milestone
P3 — BacklogWould be good to fix, but no active blocking impact
P4 — Won't fix / DeferredAccepted risk or out of scope for current product scope

Assignment

For each P1/P2 bug in sprint mode:

  • Identify which story or epic the fix belongs to
  • Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity
  • If capacity exists: assign to sprint (Sprint: [current])
  • If capacity is full: flag as Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint

For full mode: assign all P1 to current sprint, P2 to next sprint estimate, P3+ to backlog.

Deviation check

Flag bugs that suggest systematic problems:

  • 3+ bugs from the same system in the same sprint → "Potential design or implementation quality issue in [system]"
  • 2+ S1/S2 bugs in the same story → "Story may need to be reopened and re-reviewed before shipping"
  • Bug filed against a story marked Complete → "Regression in completed story — story should be re-opened in sprint tracking"

4. Trend Analysis

After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics:

Volume trends

  • Total open bugs: [N]
  • Opened this sprint: [N]
  • Closed this sprint: [N]
  • Net change: [+N / -N]

System hot spots

  • Which system has the most open bugs?
  • Which system has the highest S1/S2 ratio?

Age analysis

  • How many bugs are older than 2 sprints?
  • Are any S1/S2 bugs un-assigned (sprint = none)?

Regression indicator

  • Any bugs filed against previously-completed stories?
  • Count: [N] regression bugs (story reopened implied)

5. Generate Triage Report

# Bug Triage Report

> **Date**: [date]
> **Mode**: [sprint | full | trend]
> **Generated by**: /bug-triage
> **Open bugs processed**: [N]
> **Sprint in scope**: [sprint name, or "N/A"]

---

## Triage Summary

| Priority | Count | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| P1 — Fix this sprint | [N] | [N] assigned to sprint, [N] overflow |
| P2 — Fix soon | [N] | Scheduled for next sprint |
| P3 — Backlog | [N] | Deferred |
| P4 — Won't fix | [N] | Accepted risk |

**Critical (S1/S2) unfixed count**: [N]

---

## P1 Bugs — Fix This Sprint

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Assigned to | Story |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|-------|
| BUG-NNNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | [sprint] | [story path] |

---

## P2 Bugs — Fix Soon

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Target Sprint |
|----|--------|----------|---------|---------------|
| BUG-NNNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | Sprint [N+1] |

---

## P3/P4 Bugs — Backlog / Won't Fix

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Disposition |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|
| BUG-NNNN | [system] | S4 | [one-line description] | Backlog |

---

## Systemic Issues Flagged

[List any patterns from Step 3 deviation check, or "None identified."]

---

## Trend Analysis

**Volume**: [N] open / [+N] net change this sprint
**Hot spot**: [system with most bugs]
**Regressions**: [N] bugs against completed stories
**Aged bugs (>2 sprints old)**: [N]

[If N aged S1/S2 bugs > 0:]
> ⚠️ [N] high-severity bugs have been open for more than 2 sprints without
> assignment. These represent accepted risk that should be explicitly reviewed.

---

## Recommended Actions

1. [Most urgent action — usually "fix P1 bugs before QA hand-off"]
2. [Second action — usually "investigate [hot spot system] quality"]
3. [Third action — optional improvement]

6. Write and Gate

Present the report in conversation. If any bug is a P4 candidate, first ask "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?" and keep its disposition P4 candidate until the user answers. Then ask:

"May I write this triage report to production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md?"

Write only after approval.

After writing:

  • If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint can be considered healthy. Run /sprint-status to see current capacity."
  • If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the affected stories in sprint tracking and running /smoke-check to re-gate."
  • If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off."

Then, whether or not P1 bugs exist: Verdict: COMPLETE — triage report written.

If user declined write: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.


Collaborative Protocol

  • Never close or mark bugs Won't Fix without user approval — surface them as P4 candidates and ask: "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?"
  • Never auto-assign to a sprint at capacity — flag overflow and let the sprint owner decide what to pull
  • Severity is objective; priority is a team decision — present severity classifications as recommendations, not mandates
  • Trend data is informational — do not block work on trend findings alone; surface them as observations

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

adopt

FreeSummary

Audit an existing project's design documents and supporting files to check whether their formats work with the template's skills. Get a numbered migration plan that prioritizes gaps and required changes, rather than simply listing what exists.

  • Checking existing documents before adopting a project template
  • Auditing game design documents or architecture decision records
  • Prioritizing gaps in project tracking and configuration files
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Document a technical decision in an architecture decision record, or ADR. Capture its context, alternatives, and consequences, assign a record number, and distinguish a proposed decision from an accepted one so dependent work reflects its actual status.

  • Recording the reasons behind a technical choice
  • Documenting alternatives and consequences of a design decision
  • Creating numbered records alongside existing architecture decisions
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

Review whether game design requirements are covered by documented architecture decisions. Identify missing coverage, conflicting decisions, and engine compatibility concerns, with an optional matrix linking requirements to development stories and tests.

  • Find game requirements without architecture decisions
  • Check for conflicts between architecture decisions
  • Review compatibility with the pinned engine version
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

art-bible

FreeSummary

Create a game's art direction document, defining its visual rules, mood, shapes, colors, and production standards. Review and approve sections individually, with guidance that connects character, environment, and interface design to the game's concept and technical constraints.

  • Defining a game's core visual identity before asset production
  • Documenting character, environment, and interface design rules
  • Aligning asset standards with engine and performance limits
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

asset-audit

FreeSummary

Audit game asset files for naming rules, size limits, formats, and broken references. Receive a report of measured violations and suggested fixes, with clear explanations of checks that lack data or cannot be assessed for the engine.

  • Checking image and audio naming conventions
  • Finding files that exceed asset size limits
  • Investigating missing references and potentially unused assets
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

asset-spec

FreeSummary

Turn game design documents and character profiles into asset specifications and image generation prompts. Define appearance, dimensions, file formats, and naming rules, then maintain an asset list that tracks progress and identifies shared assets.

  • List the visual assets needed for a game
  • Define consistent character and environment asset specifications
  • Prepare image generation prompts from an art direction guide
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios26.9KUpdated Oct 8, 2026

See all skills by Donchitos

Report a problem with this skill