Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

test

[Testing] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for a local test run and read-only results summary.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md23.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-ANCHOR:START -->

[BLOCKING] Execute skill steps in declared order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval. Inside a workflow run, /start-workflow → Workflow-step mode bounds this rule. [BLOCKING] Before each step or sub-skill call, update todo tracking: set in_progress when step starts, set completed when step ends. [BLOCKING] Every completed/skipped step MUST include brief evidence or explicit skip reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, create and maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with the same status transitions.

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-ANCHOR:END -->

Quick Summary

Goal: Deliver an accurate, read-only pass/fail verdict — by running tests locally via the tester subagent and analyzing the summary report — with exact counts, failing-test names, report path, and Goal Contract evidence, so the user knows the true test state without any fix applied.

Summary:

  • Testability contract: resolve Unit/Integration/System/E2E applicability from runner/config evidence; record owner/root/data, copy-ready full + focused commands, zero-match behavior, CI/simple Windows/macOS/Linux entry, unique run/data identity, and repeat proof; unresolved applicable fields block handoff, while non-applicable tiers require evidence-backed N/A.

  • Purpose: give the user the TRUE test state — accurate pass/fail verdict, exact counts, failing-test names, report path — without applying any fix.

  • Main steps (run in order): (1) Delegate — launch the tester subagent with the test scope from arguments; NEVER invoke test commands directly. (2) Analyze — review the subagent's summary report; identify failures and patterns. (3) Report — summarize pass/fail counts, highlight failing tests, cite the report path. (4) Goal evidence — resolve the active Goal Contract, append verification evidence, update the Goal Satisfaction matrix.

  • READ-ONLY: stop at reporting; NEVER start implementing fixes — why: fixing is /fix's job and mixing it into the report hides the true test state.

  • After the run, append verification evidence (command, exact counts, report path) to the goal file's Iteration Log and update the Goal Satisfaction matrix; record "No active goal — evidence reported inline only." when none exists; NEVER copy sensitive fixture data into the goal file — why: the goal file is the durable PASS/FAIL ledger, not a secrets store.

Workflow:

  1. Delegate — first check the environment can run the suites (what this project, stack and OS need: free disk, RAM, services, toolchain, config; on a gap report ENVIRONMENT-BLOCKED with what is missing, since this read-only skill frees nothing), then launch tester subagent with test scope from arguments; run every requested tier unless the caller passed --proven evidence (Proven-Tier Evidence below)
  2. Analyze — Review test results, identify failures and patterns
  3. Report — Summarize pass/fail counts, highlight failing tests

Key Rules:

  • READ-ONLY: do not implement fixes, only report results

  • Activate relevant skills from catalog during process

  • Always use tester subagent, not direct test commands

  • Single verify run (SYNC:verify-last-order): in a code-changing task this is the ONE test run, made after the static review — never per phase, per wave or per fix. The mutation check is NOT done here (this skill is read-only): /integration-test --mode=verify or the main session (/plan --mode=execute Step 4) owns it.

  • An INTERMITTENT failure (red in one run, green in another) is NOT yet a product defect — route it through the same adjudication /integration-test --mode=verify uses before reporting it as one: (a) unrealistic scenario / compressed actor pacing, (b) harness topology amplification (shared infra, fan-out consumers, suite parallelism, cold start), or (c) a genuine product race. Report the verdict with its evidence, or report the failure as UNADJUDICATED — never as a product defect on the strength of one red run

  • Proven-tier evidence (caller-passed only): --proven=<report path>[,<report path>…] names run reports that already show tiers green on the final tree; only then are those tiers not re-run (see Proven-Tier Evidence). Default and every standalone call: run every requested tier.

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Use the tester subagent to run tests locally and analyze the summary report.

IMPORTANT: Stop at reporting results — do not start implementing. IMPORTANT: Analyze the skills catalog and activate the skills that are needed for the task during the process.

Goal Contract evidence (after test run): Resolve the active Goal Contract per the goal-contract-satisfaction-loop protocol (active plan goal.md → goals/{YYMMDD-HHmm}-{slug}/goal.md under the plans root, default plans/, relocated by docsRoots.plans.path in docs/project-config.json). When one exists, append the verification evidence to the goal file's Iteration Log — test command, exact pass/fail counts, report path — mapped to the saved success criteria the run verifies, and update the Goal Satisfaction matrix rows for those criteria (PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED). Record No active goal — evidence reported inline only. when none exists. Never copy raw sensitive fixture data into the goal file.

Contents

Proven-Tier Evidence (caller-passed)

A workflow or caller that already holds a green run on the final tree passes it explicitly: --proven=<report path>[,<report path>…] (for example the /integration-test --mode=verify report). A workflow registry passes the symbolic --proven=@verify, which names the report of this run's latest /integration-test --mode=verify occurrence: resolve it from the run's task evidence; when that step did not run in this run, or its report is missing or stale, @verify covers nothing and every requested tier runs. With a report in hand:

  • Read each named report; a tier counts as covered only when the report shows its exact command, counts and exit status green for the same scope and no source or test file changed after it (SYNC:verify-last-order — an edit after the run invalidates it). A missing, unreadable, red or stale report covers nothing.
  • Run the tester only for the configured tiers the reports do not cover. Record each covered tier as covered by <report path> — <command, exact counts>; report the union of covered and freshly run results.
  • Every applicable tier covered → skip the tester launch, record simplified: covered by <report path(s)> as the evidence, and still complete the Goal Contract evidence step.
  • No --proven input (the default, and every standalone call) → run every requested tier as usual. Never infer that a tier is proven from context you were not handed.

Exact-Result Reporting Contract (Read-Only)

The tester subagent receives the resolved contract matrix and executes only configured commands; this skill never invents a fallback runner or invokes commands directly.

  • Select the configured fullCommand or focusedCommand for the requested scope and report the command verbatim, scope, and any simple Windows/macOS/Linux entry point used. If the tier has no configured command, report evidence-backed N/A or BLOCKED rather than substituting another command.
  • Return exact exitStatus, discovered, passed, failed, and skipped counts, failing-test names, runIdentity, seed/accumulation mode, and repeat/parallel evidence. For applicable persistent-state integration suites, include two consecutive no-reset full-run results; other suites need one fresh green run.
  • A zero-match or invalid selection is non-pass even when no test throws; a non-zero exit is non-pass even when text says all tests passed. Never infer counts from a summary or silently pass an empty filter.
  • Remain read-only: do not edit tests or production code, seed or reset data, delete fixtures, or widen retries/timeouts to make a result green.

First Principle — Easy to Change · Easy to Scale · Easy to Maintain

The full gate is SYNC:core-engineering-principles (protocol guide below; a hook delivers its text); its closing digest ends this file.


Next Steps

After reporting, choose the appropriate follow-up from the results and the authorized task: /fix for failures after root-cause investigation, /docs-manager --mode=update for affected documentation, or /watzup for a requested wrap-up. Continue an active workflow at its next required step. Keep this test invocation read-only; execute authorized follow-up work through its owning skill. Ask only for indispensable missing information or action authority not already provided.

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting. This prevents context loss from long files. Keep task depth proportional to the work.

  • domain-entities-reference.md, in the project-reference docs root (default docs/project-reference/; a docsRoots.projectReference.path entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path) — Domain entity catalog, relationships, cross-service sync (read when task involves business entities/models)

External Memory: For complex or lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review), write intermediate findings and final results to a report file in tmp/reports/ — prevents context loss and serves as deliverable.

Evidence Gate: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION — every claim, finding, and recommendation requires file:line proof or traced evidence with confidence percentage (>80% to act, <80% must verify first).

<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:START -->

Protocol guides — Apply each protocol only when its read-when condition holds. If a protocol's text is not in your context, read its file below before you act on it.

  • core-engineering-principles — Core quality gate: easy to change, easy to scale, easy to maintain, judged by future change cost; planning, implementing or reviewing any change → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/core-engineering-principles.md
  • environment-fault-hypothesis — Weigh the environment as a competing cause, with a named discriminator; judging a bug report, failing test, error or unexpected output → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/environment-fault-hypothesis.md
  • evidence-based-reasoning — Ground every material claim in file:line, config or source evidence, with stated confidence; making any claim, finding or recommendation → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/evidence-based-reasoning.md
  • measured-capacity-engineering — Model demand, reduce measured work safely and prove capacity before scaling; planning, building, testing or reviewing hot paths, caches or capacity → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/measured-capacity-engineering.md
  • real-world-fidelity-testing — Integration, E2E and system tests exercise real boundaries; authoring, reviewing or repairing integration, E2E or system tests → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/real-world-fidelity-testing.md
  • source-test-drift-check — When source behavior changes, reconcile the affected tests from evidence; code, fix, test or review work changes behavior → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/source-test-drift-check.md
  • test-architecture-execution-contract — Testability as an architecture condition: required test types and execution modes; setting up or reviewing a test architecture → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/test-architecture-execution-contract.md
  • test-failure-fault-adjudication — Decide whether the source or the test is at fault before editing either; a test fails → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/test-failure-fault-adjudication.md
  • verify-last-order — Build all phases and write tests, review statically, then verify once with a mutation check; planning or running any code-changing task → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/verify-last-order.md
<!-- PROTOCOL-GUIDES:END --> <!-- SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning:reminder -->

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim; never speculate. Confidence >80% to act, <60% = do NOT recommend; "not enough evidence" is valid output.

<!-- /SYNC:evidence-based-reasoning:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:goal-contract-satisfaction-loop:reminder -->
  • MANDATORY Resolve the active Goal Contract BEFORE work (active plan goal.md → <plans root>/goals/{YYMMDD-HHmm}-{slug}/goal.md, plans root default plans and overridable via a docsRoots.plans.path entry in docs/project-config.json → create from current request) and read saved success criteria before editing.
  • MANDATORY Append iteration evidence after execution; emit a Goal Satisfaction matrix (PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED) before reporting PASS; loop on validated FAIL; escalate repeated no-progress or blockers. NEVER store secrets in goal files.
<!-- /SYNC:goal-contract-satisfaction-loop:reminder --> <!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-CLOSING:START -->

Prompt-Enhance Closing Anchors

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION follow declared step order for this skill; NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval; inside a workflow run, /start-workflow → Workflow-step mode bounds this IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION for every step/sub-skill call: set in_progress before execution, set completed after execution IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION every skipped step MUST include explicit reason; every completed step MUST include concise evidence IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION if Task tools unavailable, maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with synchronized statuses

<!-- PROMPT-ENHANCE:STEP-TASK-CLOSING:END --> <!-- SYNC:test-architecture-execution-contract:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION Each assertion-bearing test names the behavior or technical contract it protects and asserts an outcome it owns. Use the project's configured/native test format — Given/When/Then is one valid format, never a framework-wide requirement. When specArtifacts is valid, link configured owner/case/variant identity and intent/contracts evidence; when absent, name the guarded business intent or technical contract. A malformed declared profile BLOCKS without fallback. Broad test-format migration → assign an owner and next step, never rewrite cases outside scope.

MUST ATTENTION Before implementation record evidence-backed applicability for the test types and modes the task/project contract requires: copy-ready full and focused commands where available, zero-match behavior, a useful platform-appropriate entry point, supported execution modes and environments, state-isolation requirements, exact results, and repeat evidence where persistent state makes it relevant. Exercise claimed modes; report a missing required capability as ENVIRONMENT-BLOCKED. Never invent production targets or impose a test format. Browser/UI E2E uses the configured runner's waits or project helper for observable readiness and outcomes; apply action pacing only where the project contract specifies it. Reuse the project's evidenced test organization — require a POM, base class, or component taxonomy only when the project actually selects it.

<!-- /SYNC:test-architecture-execution-contract:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:environment-fault-hypothesis:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION environment-fault gate: a bug, failed test, error, or odd output is NOT proof of a code defect. Sweep environment preconditions (versions, deps/install state, config & env vars, services, ports/network/clock, permissions, leftover state) and resource/transience suspects (RAM, CPU, disk, handles, network, timeouts) as a competing hypothesis, cite the discriminator you ran, and fix an environment cause in the environment — never by editing code or weakening a test. "Flaky" is a symptom, not a verdict.

<!-- /SYNC:environment-fault-hypothesis:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:measured-capacity-engineering:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION capacity work: model demand/SLO and distinguish sessions from RPS/in-flight work; disclose load model and offered vs achieved demand; reduce measured work at a safe owner; preserve cache authorization/freshness/bounds; prove cold-state, overload recovery and justified headroom before scaling. Static review returns a verification plan, not invented throughput. Retain the hosting skill's scores, gates and authority.

<!-- /SYNC:measured-capacity-engineering:reminder -->

Closing Reminders

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Testability contract: resolve evidence-backed Unit/Integration/System/E2E rows, copy-ready full/focused commands, zero-match failures, owner/root/data, CI/simple Windows/macOS/Linux entry, unique run identity, and repeat proof before claiming setup, review, or test completion. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal: Deliver an accurate, read-only pass/fail verdict — by running tests locally via the tester subagent and analyzing the summary report — with exact counts, failing-test names, report path, and Goal Contract evidence, so the user knows the true test state without any fix applied.

Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):

  • Evidence: ALWAYS cite file:line per claim; NEVER speculate without proof.
  • Source/Test Drift: when source changes, decide from evidence whether test or source is wrong; NEVER assume.
  • Real-World Fidelity: a scenario production could never reach proves nothing green and blames the product red; distinguish harness-amplified from real before calling an intermittent failure a product defect.

MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ-ONLY — run tests, report pass/fail counts + failing-test names + report path; NEVER implement fixes here, stop at reporting — why: fixing is /fix's job; mixing the two hides the true test state. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION ALWAYS run tests through the tester subagent; NEVER invoke test commands directly — why: the subagent isolates the run and produces the canonical summary report this skill analyzes. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION resolve the active Goal Contract after the run; append verification evidence (test command, exact pass/fail counts, report path) to the goal file's Iteration Log and update the Goal Satisfaction matrix; record No active goal — evidence reported inline only. when none exists; NEVER copy raw sensitive fixture data into the goal file — why: the goal file is the durable PASS/FAIL ledger, not a secrets store. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim about a failure (confidence >80% to act, <80% verify first); NEVER speculate which test failed or why — read the report — why: a guessed failure verdict sends the user to fix the wrong thing. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION an INTERMITTENT failure is UNADJUDICATED, not a product defect — classify it as (a) unrealistic scenario / compressed actor pacing, (b) harness topology amplification (shared infra, fan-out consumers, suite parallelism, cold start), or (c) a genuine product race, with evidence, before reporting it as a defect; report it as UNADJUDICATED when the evidence is not there — why: a test-fidelity defect reported as a product defect sends the team to fix code that was never wrong. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION before asserting a test/source relationship, grep 3+ similar tests and match the local pattern; apply the source/test drift check — decide from evidence whether a failing test guards intended behavior or the source is the bug — why: a mismatched assumption mislabels a real bug as a flaky test. MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting; mark one in_progress, complete immediately after evidence; add a final review todo to verify work quality. IMPORTANT Apply Next Steps after reporting: select the supported follow-up within existing authority, preserving this invocation's read-only boundary and required workflow gates. IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ CLAUDE.md before starting.

Anti-Rationalization:

EvasionRebuttal
"Tests obviously pass, skip the run"Run via tester anyway — a guessed verdict is not a verdict. Report real counts.
"I can run the test command directly"NEVER — always delegate to the tester subagent; direct runs bypass the canonical report.
"Failure looks trivial, I'll just fix it"Stop at reporting. Fixing is /fix's job; this skill is strictly READ-ONLY.
"No goal file, skip the evidence step"Record No active goal — evidence reported inline only. Never silently skip the Goal Contract.
"I know which test failed"Show file:line + the report path. No proof = no claim.
"It failed once — that's a product bug"Intermittent = unadjudicated. Rule out unrealistic scenario and harness amplification first, with evidence.

[IMPORTANT] Analyze how big the task is and break it into many small todo tasks systematically before starting — this is very important.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ-ONLY — report pass/fail, NEVER fix here (that is /fix's job). IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION ALWAYS run via the tester subagent; cite file:line + report path for every failure claim (confidence >80%). IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal: Deliver an accurate, read-only pass/fail verdict — by running tests locally via the tester subagent and analyzing the summary report — with exact counts, failing-test names, report path, and Goal Contract evidence, so the user knows the true test state without any fix applied.

<!-- SYNC:core-engineering-principles:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION Core Engineering Principles — every plan, implementation and review must be Easy to change (reuse first, one owner per rule, interfaces/adapters at volatile boundaries, no speculative abstraction) · Easy to scale (extend by addition, bounded growth, explicit boundaries, sized to the project's real profile) · Easy to maintain (intent-named tests that fail when the rule breaks across happy/error/edge paths; harness green locally and in CI). Before done: next change → how many edit sites? 10× → what breaks? which test goes red?

<!-- /SYNC:core-engineering-principles:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:verify-last-order:reminder -->

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION code-changing work runs tests ONCE, last: build all phases + write tests → static review fix-loop → verify once with mutation check → fix and re-run to green → re-review only if step 4 edited anything. No per-phase or in-review test runs.

<!-- /SYNC:verify-last-order:reminder -->

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

[Documentation] Use when generating, smart-merging or refactoring the root AI context (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md) and its Claude/Codex projections. Config file only: project-config.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for AI code or plan review: LLM calls, prompts, agents, RAG, evals and guardrails. --mode={code|plan}; --report-only is read-only.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

[Architecture] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for architecture design, compliance review, scalability grading or whole-project audit via --mode={design|review|scalability|full}.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

[Content] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for product/feature ideation with ranked opportunities and validation tests. --mode={roadmap|scope}.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

[Content] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for business viability: Business Model Canvas, financials, risks and go-to-market recommendation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for a focused code-change review: staged, unstaged, branch diff or simple pull request. --fix-loop fixes and re-reviews. Complex pull request: workflow-review-changes; rationale: why-review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

duc01226/EasyPlatform12Updated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by duc01226

Report a problem with this skill