Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

async-python-patterns

When writing Python asyncio code — picking between gather / TaskGroup / wait, structured concurrency, timeouts, cancellation, sync-bridging — decision framework only, cookbook externalized.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

async-python-patterns

Decision framework for picking the right Python asyncio primitive. The pattern cookbook lives upstream (links in § Provenance) — this skill is the predicate, not the recipe library. Sunset-policy compliant: the 600+ lines of language-specific cookbook stay in authoritative Python docs.

When to use

  • Designing a new async I/O-bound service (FastAPI, aiohttp, async DB client).
  • Reviewing a diff that introduces asyncio.gather, asyncio.create_task, TaskGroup, as_completed, or wait_for.
  • Mixing sync and async code (calling sync libs from async context, or vice versa).
  • Diagnosing event-loop blocking, never-awaited warnings, or cancellation leaks.

Do NOT use when:

  • The work is CPU-bound — async will not help; route to multiprocessing or threadpool.
  • The runtime is not Python — read the host runtime's concurrency guide.
  • The fix is a single missing await — read the upstream tutorial directly.

Decision framework

Step 1 — Verify async is the right tool

Workload is:
  I/O-bound, many concurrent waits  → async fits (network, disk, IPC).
  CPU-bound (parsing, math, crypto) → async is wrong; use ProcessPoolExecutor.
  Mixed                              → async shell + run_in_executor for CPU bursts.
  Single sequential call             → don't introduce async; sync is simpler.

Step 2 — Pick the concurrency primitive

Run N independent coroutines, ALL must complete:
  Same trust level, exceptions cancel siblings  → asyncio.TaskGroup (3.11+; preferred).
  Pre-3.11 OR exceptions must NOT cancel peers  → asyncio.gather(*, return_exceptions=...).

Run N coroutines, react to results as they finish:
  → asyncio.as_completed (yields completed futures in finish order).

Run N coroutines, race to first success / failure:
  → asyncio.wait(..., return_when=FIRST_COMPLETED) + cancel pending.

Schedule fire-and-forget background work:
  → asyncio.create_task + keep a strong reference (else GC eats it).
  Forgetting the reference is the #1 silent-failure source.

Bound the wait time:
  → asyncio.wait_for(coro, timeout=...)  → raises TimeoutError on expiry.
  → asyncio.timeout(...) context manager (3.11+; preferred when many awaits share a deadline).

Bound concurrency (rate-limit, connection pool):
  → asyncio.Semaphore(n); acquire around the awaitable.

Step 3 — Bridge sync ↔ async correctly

Async code calls sync, blocking, function:
  Short pure-CPU              → fine, accept the block (microseconds).
  Long, blocking, or I/O-sync → await loop.run_in_executor(None, fn, *args).
  Library has async sibling   → switch the library (httpx vs requests, aiosqlite vs sqlite3).

Sync code calls async function:
  Top-level entrypoint        → asyncio.run(coro()).
  Inside running loop         → never asyncio.run; create_task + await it.
  Test suite                  → pytest-asyncio fixture; never raw run() in tests.

Step 4 — Cancellation discipline

Every long-running coroutine MUST be cancellation-safe:

  • Catch asyncio.CancelledError, perform cleanup, re-raise. Swallowing it silently breaks the propagation chain.
  • Use try / finally (or async with) around resource acquisition so cancellation cannot leak file handles, DB connections, locks.
  • Detached create_task without a strong reference is undefined behavior; either store the task or use a TaskGroup.

Step 5 — Don't block the event loop

A single blocking call (sync I/O, time.sleep, CPU-heavy parse, large JSON load) freezes every coroutine. Audit every leaf function under async def:

  • Sleep → await asyncio.sleep, never time.sleep.
  • HTTP → httpx.AsyncClient / aiohttp, never requests.
  • DB → asyncpg / aiosqlite / motor, never the sync driver.
  • File → aiofiles for hot-paths, or run_in_executor for one-shots.

Procedure: Apply to a new async feature

  1. Inspect the existing call graph and identify each await site, sync↔async boundary, and any blocking leaf calls before touching code.
  2. Run Step 1; reject if work is CPU-bound.
  3. Sketch the call graph; tag each await site with its primitive (Step 2).
  4. Mark every sync↔async boundary; pick the bridge per Step 3.
  5. For each long-running coroutine, write the cancel-safety contract (Step 4).
  6. Grep the leaf calls for blocking sins (Step 5); replace or push to executor.
  7. Hand the sketch to a reviewer before coding; cite this skill.

Output format

  1. Call-graph table: coroutine · concurrency primitive · timeout · cancel-safety note.
  2. Sync↔async boundary list: site · bridge · justification.
  3. Blocking-call audit: leaf function · status (async / executor / accepted-block + reason).
  4. Cancel-safety contract for each background task.

Gotcha

  • "It works in my REPL" — asyncio.run inside an already-running loop (Jupyter, FastAPI startup) raises RuntimeError. Use await directly or nest_asyncio (last resort).
  • asyncio.gather swallows the second exception silently; use return_exceptions=True and inspect, or use TaskGroup (cancels all on first error, surfaces the group).
  • create_task results that nobody awaits look fine until the program exits and Python prints Task was destroyed but it is pending!. Always await or use a TaskGroup.
  • wait_for on a non-cancellation-safe coroutine leaks resources; the timeout cancels the task but cleanup never runs.
  • Libraries that "support async" via thread pools (e.g. requests-async) often re-block the loop under load; verify with the cited upstream library docs, not the README.

Do NOT

  • Do NOT call asyncio.run from a running loop.
  • Do NOT swallow CancelledError without re-raising.
  • Do NOT call sync blocking I/O from async paths without run_in_executor.
  • Do NOT spawn create_task without storing the reference (or using TaskGroup).
  • Do NOT inline the asyncio cookbook into this skill — externalize per Sunset Policy.

Auto-trigger keywords

  • asyncio
  • async / await
  • gather / TaskGroup / wait_for
  • event loop blocking
  • cancellation
  • sync to async bridge

Provenance

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

event4u-app/agent-config12Updated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by event4u-app

Report a problem with this skill