Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when creating or editing a guideline in docs/guidelines/ — reference material cited by skills, no auto-triggers — even when the user just says 'write up our naming conventions'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
docs/guidelines/{topic}/{name}.mdDo NOT use this skill when:
rule-writingskill-writingcommand-writing| Intent | Artifact |
|---|---|
| "Here is knowledge skills and rules may cite" | Guideline |
| "Agent must always / never do X" | Rule |
| "When Y happens, run these steps" | Skill |
A guideline is reference material. It is never a trigger. It has no
description used for routing — skills and rules link to it.
Creating or materially rewriting a guideline must go through Understand
→ Research → Draft from the
artifact-drafting-protocol rule.
docs/guidelines/ for overlap and grep
src/ for pages that already cover the topic.
Analyze 1–2 peer guidelines in the same topic folder for tone.Folders under docs/guidelines/:
| Folder | Contents |
|---|---|
agent-infra/ | Cross-cutting agent-system knowledge (naming, size, output patterns) |
php/ | PHP-specific reference (patterns, services, jobs, resources) |
e2e/ | End-to-end testing patterns |
If none fits, ask the user before creating a new folder.
Guidelines use a minimal frontmatter — no type, no auto-trigger semantics.
---
description: "Short human-readable summary — cited by skills, not used for routing"
source: package # or project for consumer-local guidelines
---
If you do want to polish the description for a guideline whose summary
gets surfaced to agents, delegate to the
description-assist skill — same
approval-gated flow as for skills and rules.
# heading that matches the filename.A guideline is useless if nothing cites it. Before closing the task:
→ See 'docs/guidelines/{topic}/{name}.md' for full X.preservation-guard.)Guidelines have more room than rules but are not dumping grounds.
| Category | Target |
|---|---|
| Ideal | ≤ 200 lines |
| Acceptable | ≤ 400 lines |
| Split signal | > 500 lines |
Above the split signal, break by sub-topic into sibling files in the same folder.
./scripts-run src/scripts/skill_linter docs/guidelines/{topic}/{name}.md
→ 0 FAIL (guidelines have relaxed linting but must still parse).bash scripts/condense.sh --sync → projects updates../scripts-run src/scripts/check_references → no broken links.Taskfile.yml in this repo for
the script list) — must exit 0 except for tolerated warnings.docs/guidelines/{topic}/{name}.mdcheck_references.ts cleanbash scripts/condense.sh --sync confirmationpreservation-guard).Apply the Frugality Charter to every guideline you author.
Examples in this artifact:
Pre-save self-check:
type: or alwaysApply: to the frontmatter.agent-src.uncondensed/guidelines/ — relocated to docs/guidelines/On cloud surfaces (Claude.ai Web, Skills API) the package's
scripts/check_references.ts, scripts/skill_linter.ts, and task
runner are not reachable. The skill still applies — with prose-only
validation:
description only, no type, no
alwaysApply.docs/guidelines/{topic}/{name}.md and run
task sync && task lint-skills && task check-refs locally before
committing.Good guideline name + description:
Path:
docs/guidelines/agent-infra/size-and-scope.mdDescription: "Golden size rules for rules, skills, commands, and guidelines"
Bad:
Path: guidelines/stuff (no topic folder, meaningless stem) Description: "Things to know"
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.