Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when the project's frontend stack is Livewire — dispatched by `directives/ui/{apply,review,polish}.ts`. Covers reactive state, events, lifecycle hooks, and component/view separation.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Grounded stack guidance: pull idiomatic Blade/UI Do/Don't + docs URLs via
node <skills-root>/corpus-grounding/scripts/ground.mjs search --manifest <skills-root>/design-intelligence/data/manifest.json --stack laravel "<topic>"(UI-scoped corpus). Seedesign-intelligence.
livewire is the apply-step executor for the Livewire stack. It is
invoked by directives/ui/apply.ts
once the design brief is locked, and revisited by review.ts /
polish.ts during the design-review loop. It does not own the
flow, does not drive the audit, and does not lock the design.
| Concern | Owner |
|---|---|
| Audit + token inventory (mandatory pre-step) | existing-ui-audit |
| Design brief (layout / states / microcopy) | directives/ui/design.ts |
| Universal design heuristics | fe-design |
| Static Blade partials inside the view | blade-ui |
| Flux primitives inside the view | flux |
Cite this skill when:
state.stack.frontend == "livewire" and directives/ui/apply.ts dispatches to this skillDo NOT use when:
blade-ui skill)flux skill — livewire composes Flux internally)directives/ui/ orchestratorcomposer.json for livewire/livewire.
#[Layout], #[Title], property attributes.$layout, $listeners, method-based hooks.app/Livewire/ or app/Http/Livewire/.resources/views/livewire/.declare(strict_types=1), final class.#[Locked] for tamper-proof properties.#[Url] for URL-synced properties.$this->validate().$this->dispatch() for cross-component communication (v3).<div>).wire:key on dynamic lists.wire:loading for user feedback.wire:model.live for real-time updates (v3 default is deferred).Livewire::test(ComponentClass::class)->set(), ->call(), ->assertSee(), ->assertHasNoErrors()→ See guideline php/livewire.md for state management, forms, performance, Alpine.js, templates.
When this skill is dispatched by directives/ui/review.ts (test slot)
or directives/ui/polish.ts (verify slot) — i.e. a review/polish run,
not the initial apply — it also emits:
state.ui_review.a11y — {violations: [{rule, selector, severity}, ...], severity_floor?, accepted_violations?}. Use the same (rule, selector)
shape as state.ui_audit.a11y_baseline so the engine's de-dup matches
pre-existing entries on replay. Omit the envelope on apply passes; the
engine's _apply_a11y_gate only fires when a baseline is present.state.ui_review.preview — {render_ok: bool, screenshot_path?, dom_dump_path?, error?, skipped?}. render_ok: false with error
populated triggers the preview_render_failed halt; render_ok: true
with screenshot_path threads the screenshot into the delivery
report's artifacts list. Browser tooling (Playwright/Cypress/…) is
a consumer-project dependency — this package does not ship one.Polish dispatch: when the dispatcher skips review because a previous
review pass already returned SUCCESS, this skill MUST itself
synthesise the updated state.ui_review.findings (including any
remaining a11y_violation entries) so the engine's gate sees the
current state on the next polish round.
wire:model is deferred by default in v3 — use wire:model.live for real-time.$this->redirect() + $this->dispatch() in same method — only redirect executes.render() — it runs on every update.When a Livewire component renders UI, pull
docs/guidelines/design-antipatterns.md
for the Visual / Layout / Motion checks (loading states that animate layout
properties — M2 — are a common Livewire wire:loading pitfall). Stack styling
bans: tailwind-engineer.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.