Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when an idea becomes a Pixar-style animation prompt — character sheet, scene, image, video; emotional beat, want, obstacle. Triggers 'Pixar prompt', 'animated scene'. Live-action → video-director.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Turn an animation beat into the four-block storyboard: CHARACTER SHEET · SCENE PROMPT · IMAGE PROMPT · VIDEO PROMPT. Output is provider-agnostic; provider tuning is
motion-choreographer.The acting / storyboard lens is enforced inline by the procedure and self-review below.
video-director.Do NOT use when:
motion-choreographer after this skill.character-consistency first
to lock the CHARACTER SHEET, then call this skill.canvas-design.character.json exists under agents/reference/ai-video/<project>/characters/,
read identity tokens — reused verbatim in CHARACTER SHEET.Emit each block under a labeled heading. Blocks are mandatory and in this order:
character.json
when a lock exists.anticipation Xs · action Ys · reaction Zs with explicit beat
counts. Names which secondary motion (hair, cloth, dust) reacts
on which beat.character.json byte-for-byte when a
lock exists?Any "no" → revise that block.
scripts/ai-video/lib/parse-blueprint.sh.motion-choreographer.video-director's
block, not this one.scenes/<id>/prompt.txt — four labeled blocks, ready for
the blueprint parser.scenes/<id>/review.md — one-paragraph rationale per
non-obvious choice (stylistic anchor, environment reaction,
beat decomposition).character.json exists, paraphrasing breaks Character Lock —
copy identity tokens verbatim.video-director.motion-choreographer.Paths, enforcement model, and the full set: the media policy preamble.
The Pixar-storyteller skill anchors prompts to named films and studios by design — the policy surface is the largest in the video cluster:
style — naming a film + year as the primary anchor crosses the "in the style of [STUDIO]" trigger; surface and refuse without a transformative-intent rationale.likeness — when a beat references a named animator's signature character (real-person extension of style).public-figures — when the storyteller's character is a recognised public figure rendered in Pixar shape.disclosure — every Pixar-style output ships with the AI-generation disclosure; parody / commentary cases are flagged for human review.Refuse-and-surface when style ⇒ primary signature, not one influence among several.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.