Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when you need this project's coding standards (line length, quotes, import order, naming, commit format) — derive them from the REAL tooling config as a pointer + digest, never a guessed claim.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Evidence v2 Class A — configured convention. The safe, on-thesis half of self-building project context: coding standards are not guessed and not observed, they are derived from the real tooling config. The config is the standard; this skill produces a pointer + digest, never a flattened claim. High-trust, auto-refreshable, drift-proof — because the truth lives in the config file, and the card only points at it plus distils the 3–5 points an agent needs most while writing.
Definitions (Class A/B/C, trust tiers, the v1↔v2 isolation contract) live in
evidence-discipline;
the parent context mechanism is context-document.
Do NOT use for: a standard that has no config backing (that is a guessed
or observed convention — Class B, not A; never invent a Class-A claim); the
concrete shape of code (that is v1 source-discovery, read fresh); a project
with no tooling config at all (record a negative fact: "no enforced standard
found", do not fabricate one).
.editorconfig, CONTRIBUTING.md, commitlint /
.gitmessage, the lint/format steps in the CI workflow.eslint.config.js / .eslintrc*, .prettierrc*, biome.json,
tsconfig.json (strictness).pint.json, .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpcs.xml.pyproject.toml / ruff.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black]),
setup.cfg..rubocop.yml. Go: gofmt/golangci.yml.extends. A fourteen-line linter
config whose only load-bearing line points into a package in the same
workspace is not a project without standards; it is a project whose standards
are one hop away, and "no enforced standard found" there is a false negative
that reads exactly like a true one. extends is specified in TypeScript,
ESLint, Biome and Stylelint; includes plays the same role in PHPStan and
Rector; workspace: is documented in npm, yarn, pnpm and bun.
tsconfig.json, .eslintrc, .env or
deployment manifest is the one that package's build reads; a root file it
does not extend has no effect on it. Reading the root config for an edit
inside a package that carries its own is a wrong answer, not a coarse
one. Report the outranked root candidate too, so the precedence is visible.external and excluded from
the digest. Presenting a third-party preset as the project's own standard
is worse than reporting nothing — the reader cannot tell which rules the
project chose. Report it with its path; do not merge it.ruff.toml → line-length = 88 (scope: src/**/*.py), NOT
"the project uses line length 88". The pointer makes the claim re-checkable
and the next agent can open the config to confirm.config_mtime (or content hash).
The digest is stale when the config file's mtime/hash changes → re-derive. No
human gate is needed (Class A is deterministic) — the digest is regenerated
from the config, never hand-edited.agents/settings/contexts/ (see
Output format). Class A is high-trust because config-derived — it is read
for heuristics only and never bypasses a fresh structural read (the v1↔v2
isolation contract in evidence-discipline).A Class-A standards card MUST contain, in order:
class: A, trust: high (config-derived), and a
sources: list of {path, config_mtime} for every config the digest reads.standard | value | source (file:key) | scope. No standard appears without a source cell pointing at
a real config file.config_mtime changes, and is read for heuristics only (never a structural
bypass).scope-control).evidence-discipline — Class A/B/C, trust tiers, the isolation contract.context-document — the parent context mechanism + storage locations.source-discovery — v1 structural discovery (read fresh; Class A never bypasses it).No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.