Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when a live-action beat becomes the 11-block cinematic prompt — lens, lighting, negatives. Triggers 'cinematic prompt', 'film-grade scene'. Animated → pixar-storyteller; 12-block → scene-expander.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Turn a scene idea into the 11-block cinematic prompt the
hollywood-directorpersona ships. Output is provider-agnostic prose; provider-specific tuning is handed off tomotion-choreographer.
pixar-storyteller.Do NOT use when:
canvas-design.motion-choreographer after this skill has produced the blocks.character-consistency first
to lock identity tokens, then call this skill.character.json exists under agents/reference/ai-video/<project>/characters/,
read the identity tokens — they are reused verbatim.Emit each block on its own labeled line. Blocks are mandatory and in this order:
character.json
when present; otherwise silhouette + wardrobe + signature prop.Any "no" → revise that block before handing off.
scripts/ai-video/lib/parse-blueprint.sh (Phase 3 Step 5).--aspect, no --model). That is
motion-choreographer's job.scenes/<id>/prompt.txt — 11 labeled blocks, one per line,
ready for the blueprint parser.scenes/<id>/review.md — one-paragraph rationale per
non-obvious directorial choice (lens, light angle, camera move).character.json exists, paraphrasing identity tokens breaks
Character Lock — copy them verbatim.motion-choreographer's scope.character.json exists.Paths, enforcement model, and the full set: the media policy preamble.
The 11-block cinematic prompt is live-action shape — real-person and brand-impersonation risks are the highest in the cluster. Before emitting:
likeness — when the prompt names or visually identifies a real person on camera.public-figures — when the subject is a recognised public figure.brand-impersonation — when the prompt copies a journalism / broadcaster / regulated-industry visual identity.style — when LIGHT / LENS choices are anchored to a named living cinematographer's signature.disclosure — every distributed live-action AI clip carries the non-removable AI-generation disclosure.Refuse-and-surface at the directorial layer; live-action realism amplifies every policy gap downstream.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.