Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ce-product-pulse

Gather usage, performance, and error data from configured sources for a chosen time window. Produce a compact, saved product report with followup actions, and show its headlines in chat to support regular reviews of product activity.

OriginalShow the original description

Generate time-windowed product pulse reports from configured signals.

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing product usage and errors over the past 24 hours
  • Checking product activity during a launch window
  • Saving weekly reports to track changes over time
  • Identifying followup actions from analytics and tracing

Files included (7)

  • SKILL.md7.6 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml43 B
  • references/config.md1.8 KB
  • references/interview.md21.2 KB
  • references/report-template.md4.9 KB
  • references/run.md2.8 KB
  • references/setup.md4.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Product Pulse

ce-product-pulse queries the product's data sources for a given time window and produces a compact, single-page report covering usage, performance, errors, and followups. The report is saved to <root>/pulse-reports/ and the key points are shown in chat.

Done: a report of 30-40 lines exists at <root>/pulse-reports/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM.md, its headlines and top followup are in chat, and Phase 3 (Scheduling) has been reached.

Boundaries

  • Read-only, everywhere. The skill does not mutate the product, the database, or any external system. Its only writes are pulse settings appended to .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml (interview and opt-out writes stay on the local override) and the report file. MCP and other data-source tools are invoked read-only; if a tool offers write modes, do not use them. A database source must be a read-only connection — the interview refuses read-write credentials, and DB access is optional, since many products complete the pulse with analytics and tracing alone.
  • No PII in saved reports. No user emails, account IDs, or message content in the file written to disk.
  • Read it like a founder. No hardcoded thresholds, no default "good"/"bad" labels, no alerting: present the numbers and let the reader judge.
  • Single page. Target 30-40 lines. If a section is thin, leave it thin; if the report is getting long, cut.
  • Not a shipping log or a dashboard replacement. Shipped work lives in the issue tracker and commit history. Deep investigation still uses the native tools; this consolidates a single-page read, and every run is saved so past pulses browse as a timeline.

Interaction Method

Default to the host's blocking question tool already in the current tool list (match by capability, not by a host-specific name). Presence in the current tool list is proof the tool exists; never call a user-facing question tool to discover whether it exists. If a matching tool is listed but unloaded, use the host's tool-discovery primitive to load that capability — do not search for another host's tool name. Fall back to numbered options on the host's user-visible chat surface only when no such tool is in the list or a real question call errors. Never silently skip the question.

Ask one question at a time. Reserve multi-select for first-run configuration only.

Lookback Window

The lookback window is the time range this skill was invoked with (e.g. 24h, 7d) — present in the current prompt or conversation, whether the user gave it directly or a calling skill passed it. Common forms are trailing hours (24h, 48h, 72h), trailing days (7d, 30d), and 1h for launches.

If the argument is empty, default to pulse_lookback_default from config (resolved in Phase 0, Route by config state); if that is also unset, fall through to the hard default of 24h. If the argument is unparseable, ask the user to clarify.

Apply a 15-minute trailing buffer to the window's upper bound. Many analytics and tracing tools have ingestion lag; querying right up to now under-reports the most recent events. For a 24h window, query [now - 24h - 15m, now - 15m].

Artifact Root

This skill writes pulse reports under <root>/pulse-reports/. Resolve <root> when you first compose a <root>/ path (per the block below), never before you need it. A write to <root>/... and a read of <root>/solutions/ both count as composing a <root>/ path, so either one triggers resolution; only a run that touches no <root>/ path at all -- a scratch-only or no-repo flow -- skips it.

<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->

Resolve the CE artifact root <root> before composing any artifact path.

  • Read docs_root from <repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yaml only (<repo-root> = git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Do not read it from config.local.yaml. Unset -> <root> is docs, exactly as before.
  • Validate a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under .git/. Otherwise stop with an error naming docs_root and the value -- never fall back to docs.
  • Use <root> as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as <root>/<subdir> with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also read docs.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->

Phase 0: Route by config state

<!-- ce-config-layers:start -->

Resolve ordinary CE yaml keys from the two repo files.

  • Read <repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.local.yaml, then config.yaml (<repo-root> = git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Missing files are skipped. Gitignore does not change resolution.
  • Win with the first active (non-commented) value. For scalars, empty is unset; an invalid value continues to the next layer, then the skill default. For lists and maps, a present key — including an empty list or map — replaces the whole key.
  • Do not use this rule for docs_root — that key is config.yaml only.
<!-- ce-config-layers:end -->

Resolve <repo-root> with git rev-parse --show-toplevel, then apply the ordinary-key rule above to the pulse_* keys. Read references/config.md whenever a pulse_* value has to be interpreted — it is the key schema and nothing else: each key, its allowed values, and its default, with an unset or invalid value taking the documented default rather than being guessed.

Routing: every run passes through Phase 2 (Run the pulse) and then Phase 3 (Scheduling). Run Phase 1 (First-run interview) first when pulse_product_name is unset after cascade (the ordinary-key rule above), when the repo root cannot be resolved, or when the argument was setup, reconfigure, or edit config. Otherwise start at Phase 2 (Run the pulse).

Phase 1: First-run interview

Read references/setup.md first; this read is required. It defines the strategy-doc seeding, the interview order and its pushback bar, the read-write database refusal, how the config is written to config.local.yaml without disturbing other keys, and the one-time scheduling offer. The questions themselves come from references/interview.md, which that file names as its own required read.

Phase 2: Run the pulse

If Phase 1 (First-run interview) ran, re-apply the ordinary-key rule (local then tracked) from the repo root using the native file-read tool before any query, to pick up edits accepted during the Phase 1 review step. Otherwise use the pulse_* values already extracted in Phase 0 (Route by config state), applying the defaults in references/config.md for anything unset.

Then read references/run.md before dispatching any query; this read is required. It defines which queries run in parallel and which run serially, the pulse_db_enabled check that decides whether database work runs, the optional quality sampling and its scoring discipline, the four report sections, and where the report is written.

Phase 3: Scheduling

Setup offers a recurring run once (references/setup.md). On later runs, mention it again lightly: if the argument was a schedule keyword (daily, hourly, weekly), say this run is ad-hoc and point at the harness's scheduling primitive; if no schedule is on file and this is the third or later run, mention once that scheduling is available. Do not nag on every run, and never schedule automatically — any handoff to a scheduling primitive requires explicit confirmation.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

ce-babysit-pr

FreeSummary

Monitor an open GitHub pull request over time, respond to review feedback, and address automated check failures. Apply and push fixes, then report whether it appears ready to merge or what still blocks progress.

  • Monitoring a pull request until it appears ready to merge
  • Addressing review feedback as it arrives
  • Handling automated check failures during review
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

ce-bakeoff

FreeSummary

Develop independent solutions to a defined problem, compare them against shared requirements, and combine useful contributions into a coherent recommendation. An independent assessment and evidence checks support the selection, while unresolved tradeoffs and verification needs remain explicit.

  • Comparing concrete solutions to a defined problem
  • Developing rough options before choosing an approach
  • Comparing architectural or product proposals
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

ce-brainstorm

FreeSummary

Turn a vague feature idea into clear requirements through dialogue. Define what to build, its scope, and success criteria, then capture the result in a short chat summary or a requirements document ready for implementation planning.

  • Clarifying a vague feature idea
  • Narrowing the scope of an ambitious improvement
  • Documenting requirements before implementation planning
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

ce-code-review

FreeSummary

Review code changes or a pull request for bugs, effects on existing behavior, test gaps, and project standards. Receive findings supported by the code and a clear account of review coverage, with local fixes available when explicitly requested.

  • Reviewing a pull request before release
  • Checking changes for bugs and test gaps
  • Applying review findings locally
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

ce-commit

FreeSummary

Save working changes as local Git commits with messages that explain the outcome. Follow the project's commit style, select files explicitly, and split clearly separate changes into a few logical commits when appropriate.

  • Saving completed work as a local commit
  • Writing messages that explain the outcome
  • Separating unrelated changes into commits
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Commit and push code changes, then open a pull request with a clear title and description. You can also draft or update PR descriptions and hand published requests to the follow-up monitoring workflow.

  • Committing changes and opening a pull request
  • Drafting only a PR title and description
  • Updating an existing PR description
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin25.6KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by EveryInc

Report a problem with this skill